Convert Figma logo to code with AI

xojs logoxo

❤️ JavaScript/TypeScript linter (ESLint wrapper) with great defaults

7,774
289
7,774
64

Top Related Projects

29,311

🌟 JavaScript Style Guide, with linter & automatic code fixer

50,335

Prettier is an opinionated code formatter.

25,843

Find and fix problems in your JavaScript code.

5,902

:vertical_traffic_light: An extensible linter for the TypeScript language

9,023

JSHint is a tool that helps to detect errors and potential problems in your JavaScript code

3,640

JSLint, The JavaScript Code Quality and Coverage Tool

Quick Overview

XO is a JavaScript/TypeScript linter with a focus on code quality and style enforcement. It combines ESLint with a curated set of rules to provide an opinionated, zero-configuration linting experience. XO aims to help developers write clean, consistent, and error-free code with minimal setup.

Pros

  • Zero-configuration setup, works out of the box
  • Integrates well with popular editors and CI/CD pipelines
  • Supports both JavaScript and TypeScript
  • Regularly updated with the latest ESLint rules and best practices

Cons

  • Opinionated nature may not suit all coding styles or preferences
  • Limited customization options compared to raw ESLint
  • May require additional setup for complex projects or non-standard configurations

Code Examples

  1. Basic usage in a Node.js script:
// example.js
const x = 'foo'
x = 'bar' // XO will catch this reassignment error
  1. Using XO with React:
// Component.jsx
import React from 'react'

const MyComponent = ({name}) => (
  <div>Hello, {name}!</div>
)

export default MyComponent
  1. TypeScript example:
// greeter.ts
function greet(person: string): string {
  return `Hello, ${person}!`
}

console.log(greet('World'))

Getting Started

  1. Install XO in your project:
npm install --save-dev xo
  1. Add a script to your package.json:
{
  "scripts": {
    "lint": "xo"
  }
}
  1. Run XO:
npm run lint

To automatically fix issues, use:

npm run lint -- --fix

Competitor Comparisons

29,311

🌟 JavaScript Style Guide, with linter & automatic code fixer

Pros of Standard

  • Larger community and wider adoption, leading to better support and resources
  • No configuration required, promoting consistency across projects
  • Automatic formatting on save with many popular editors and IDEs

Cons of Standard

  • Less flexibility in rule customization
  • Stricter rules that may not suit all coding styles or preferences
  • Slower performance compared to XO, especially on larger codebases

Code Comparison

Standard:

function example (x, y) {
  if (x) {
    return y
  }
}

XO:

function example(x, y) {
	if (x) {
		return y;
	}
}

The main differences in this example are:

  • Space after function name in Standard, none in XO
  • No semicolons in Standard, required in XO
  • Tabs for indentation in XO, spaces in Standard

Both Standard and XO are popular JavaScript linters and style checkers. Standard focuses on simplicity and zero-configuration, while XO offers more customization options. The choice between them often depends on project requirements, team preferences, and the desired balance between strictness and flexibility in coding style enforcement.

50,335

Prettier is an opinionated code formatter.

Pros of Prettier

  • Wider language support, including CSS, HTML, and more
  • Opinionated formatting with fewer configuration options, leading to more consistent code across projects
  • Larger community and ecosystem, with integrations for many editors and tools

Cons of Prettier

  • Less flexibility in code style customization
  • May reformat code in ways that some developers find less readable
  • Can be slower on large codebases compared to XO

Code Comparison

XO:

function example (a, b) {
    return a + b;
}

Prettier:

function example(a, b) {
  return a + b;
}

Key Differences

  • XO is primarily a JavaScript/TypeScript linter with formatting capabilities, while Prettier is a dedicated code formatter for multiple languages
  • XO allows more granular control over code style rules, whereas Prettier aims for a more opinionated, consistent style
  • Prettier focuses solely on formatting, while XO includes additional linting rules for code quality and potential errors

Use Cases

  • Choose XO for projects requiring specific JavaScript/TypeScript linting rules and more control over code style
  • Opt for Prettier in multi-language projects or when seeking a low-configuration, opinionated formatter

Both tools have their strengths and can be used together in some workflows, with Prettier handling formatting and XO focusing on linting rules.

25,843

Find and fix problems in your JavaScript code.

Pros of ESLint

  • Highly configurable with extensive rule sets and plugins
  • Large community support and ecosystem
  • Supports custom parsers for non-standard JavaScript syntax

Cons of ESLint

  • More complex setup and configuration process
  • Steeper learning curve for beginners
  • Potentially slower performance due to its extensive feature set

Code Comparison

ESLint configuration example:

{
  "extends": "eslint:recommended",
  "rules": {
    "indent": ["error", 2],
    "quotes": ["error", "single"],
    "semi": ["error", "always"]
  }
}

XO configuration example:

{
  "extends": "xo",
  "space": true,
  "semicolon": false
}

ESLint offers more granular control over individual rules, while XO provides a simpler, opinionated configuration. ESLint's flexibility allows for fine-tuning of rules, but XO's approach reduces setup complexity.

Both tools aim to improve code quality and consistency, but they cater to different user preferences. ESLint is ideal for projects requiring extensive customization, while XO is better suited for those seeking a quick, opinionated setup with minimal configuration.

5,902

:vertical_traffic_light: An extensible linter for the TypeScript language

Pros of TSLint

  • More extensive rule set, offering greater customization for TypeScript projects
  • Better integration with TypeScript compiler, providing more accurate linting
  • Supports custom rules and plugins for project-specific needs

Cons of TSLint

  • Slower performance, especially on larger projects
  • Steeper learning curve due to more complex configuration options
  • Discontinued project, with official recommendation to migrate to ESLint

Code Comparison

TSLint configuration:

{
  "rules": {
    "no-unused-variable": true,
    "semicolon": [true, "always"],
    "quotemark": [true, "single"]
  }
}

XO configuration:

{
  "extends": "xo",
  "rules": {
    "semicolon": ["error", "always"],
    "quotes": ["error", "single"]
  }
}

TSLint offers more TypeScript-specific rules, while XO provides a simpler configuration with sensible defaults. XO is more lightweight and faster, making it suitable for smaller projects or those prioritizing speed. TSLint's extensive rule set and TypeScript integration make it better for large-scale TypeScript projects, despite its discontinued status. XO's simplicity and active maintenance make it a more future-proof choice for general JavaScript and TypeScript linting needs.

9,023

JSHint is a tool that helps to detect errors and potential problems in your JavaScript code

Pros of JSHint

  • Longer history and established reputation in the JavaScript community
  • More configurable with a wide range of options
  • Supports older JavaScript versions and legacy codebases

Cons of JSHint

  • Less frequent updates and slower adoption of new ECMAScript features
  • More complex configuration process
  • Lacks some modern linting features and code style enforcement capabilities

Code Comparison

JSHint configuration example:

{
  "esversion": 6,
  "node": true,
  "curly": true,
  "eqeqeq": true
}

XO configuration example:

{
  "extends": "xo",
  "space": true,
  "semicolon": false
}

XO offers a more opinionated and streamlined approach to linting, with fewer configuration options but sensible defaults. It focuses on modern JavaScript practices and enforces a consistent code style out of the box. JSHint, on the other hand, provides more granular control over linting rules but requires more setup and maintenance.

While JSHint is still widely used, especially in older projects, XO has gained popularity for its simplicity and modern approach to JavaScript linting. XO also integrates well with other tools in the JavaScript ecosystem, making it a popular choice for new projects and developers looking for a more opinionated linting solution.

3,640

JSLint, The JavaScript Code Quality and Coverage Tool

Pros of JSLint

  • Longer history and established reputation in the JavaScript community
  • Stricter coding standards, which can lead to more consistent and error-free code
  • Simpler configuration with fewer options, making it easier for beginners to use

Cons of JSLint

  • Less flexible and customizable compared to XO
  • Slower adoption of new JavaScript features and syntax
  • Smaller ecosystem and fewer integrations with modern development tools

Code Comparison

JSLint:

/*jslint browser */
function example(x) {
    "use strict";
    return x + 1;
}

XO:

function example(x) {
	return x + 1;
}

JSLint requires explicit strict mode and encourages JSLint-specific comments, while XO focuses on modern JavaScript practices and doesn't require additional syntax. XO's default configuration is more lenient, allowing for a smoother integration into existing projects.

Both tools aim to improve code quality, but XO offers more flexibility and better support for modern JavaScript development workflows. JSLint, on the other hand, provides a more opinionated approach to writing JavaScript, which can be beneficial for teams looking for strict adherence to specific coding standards.

Convert Figma logo designs to code with AI

Visual Copilot

Introducing Visual Copilot: A new AI model to turn Figma designs to high quality code using your components.

Try Visual Copilot

README


XO


JavaScript/TypeScript linter (ESLint wrapper) with great defaults

Coverage Status XO code style

Opinionated but configurable ESLint wrapper with lots of goodies included. Enforces strict and readable code. Never discuss code style on a pull request again! No decision-making. No eslint.config.js to manage. It just works!

It uses ESLint underneath, so issues regarding built-in rules should be opened over there.

XO requires your project to be ESM.

Highlights

  • Beautiful output.
  • Zero-config, but configurable when needed.
  • Enforces readable code, because you read more code than you write.
  • No need to specify file paths to lint as it lints all JS/TS files except for commonly ignored paths.
  • Flat config customization.
  • TypeScript supported by default.
  • Includes many useful ESLint plugins, like unicorn, import, ava, n and more.
  • Caches results between runs for much better performance.
  • Super simple to add XO to a project with $ npm init xo.
  • Fix many issues automagically with $ xo --fix.
  • Open all files with errors at the correct line in your editor with $ xo --open.
  • Specify indent and semicolon preferences easily without messing with the rule config.
  • Optionally use the Prettier code style or turn off all Prettier rules with the compat option.
  • Optionally use eslint-config-xo-react for easy jsx and react linting with zero config.
  • Optionally use with ESLint directly
  • Great editor plugins.

Install

npm install xo --save-dev

You must install XO locally. You can run it directly with $ npx xo.

You'll need eslint-config-xo-vue for specific linting in a Vue app.

Usage

$ xo --help

	Usage
		$ xo [<file|glob> ...]

	Options
		--fix             Automagically fix issues
		--reporter        Reporter to use
		--space           Use space indent instead of tabs [Default: 2]
		--config          Path to a XO configuration file
		--semicolon       Use semicolons [Default: true]
		--react           Include React specific parsing and xo-react linting rules [Default: false]
		--prettier        Format with prettier or turn off prettier conflicted rules when set to 'compat' [Default: false]
		--print-config    Print the effective ESLint config for the given file
		--version         Print XO version
		--open            Open files with issues in your editor
		--quiet           Show only errors and no warnings
		--stdin           Validate/fix code from stdin
		--stdin-filename  Specify a filename for the --stdin option
		--ignore          Ignore pattern globs, can be set multiple times
		--cwd=<dir>       Working directory for files [Default: process.cwd()]

	Examples
		$ xo
		$ xo index.js
		$ xo *.js !foo.js
		$ xo --space
		$ xo --print-config=index.js
		$ echo 'const x=true' | xo --stdin --fix

	Tips
		- Add XO to your project with `npm init xo`.
		- Put options in xo.config.js instead of using flags so other tools can read it.

Default code style

Any of these can be overridden if necessary.

  • Tab indentation (or space)
  • Semicolons (or not)
  • Single-quotes
  • Trailing comma for multiline statements
  • No unused variables
  • Space after keyword if (condition) {}
  • Always === instead of ==

Check out an example and the ESLint rules.

Workflow

The recommended workflow is to add XO locally to your project and run it with the tests.

Simply run $ npm init xo (with any options) to add XO to create an xo.config.js.

Config

You can configure XO options by creating an xo.config.js or an xo.config.ts file in the root directory of your project. XO supports all js/ts file extensions (js,cjs,mjs,ts,cts,mts) automatically. A XO config is an extension of ESLint's Flat Config. Like ESLint, an XO config exports an array of XO config objects. XO config objects extend ESLint Configuration Objects. This means all the available configuration params for ESLint also work for XO. However, XO enhances and adds extra params to the configuration objects to make them easier to work with.

Config types

XO exports the types FlatXoConfig, XoConfigItem, and other types for you to get TypeScript validation on your config files.

examples: xo.config.js

/** @type {import('xo').FlatXoConfig} */
const xoConfig = [...]

xo.config.ts

import {type FlatXoConfig} from 'xo';

const xoConfig: FlatXoConfig = [...]

files

Type: string | string[] | undefined
Default: **/*.{js,cjs,mjs,jsx,ts,cts,mts,tsx}

A glob or array of glob strings which the config object will apply. By default XO will apply the configuration to all files.

ignores

Type: string[]

Some paths are ignored by default, including paths in .gitignore. Additional ignores can be added here. For global ignores, keep ignores as the only key in the config item.

space

Type: boolean | number
Default: false (tab indentation)

Set it to true to get 2-space indentation or specify the number of spaces.

This option exists for pragmatic reasons, but I would strongly recommend you read “Why tabs are superior”.

semicolon

Type: boolean
Default: true (Semicolons required)

Set it to false to enforce no-semicolon style.

prettier

Type: boolean | 'compat'
Default: false

Format code with Prettier.

Prettier options will be based on your Prettier config. XO will then merge your options with its own defaults:

To stick with Prettier's defaults, add this to your Prettier config:

export default {
	singleQuote: false,
	bracketSpacing: true,
};

If contradicting options are set for both Prettier and XO, an error will be thrown.

Compat

If the Prettier option is set to compat, instead of formatting your code automatically, XO will turn off all rules that conflict with Prettier code style and allow you to pass your formatting to the Prettier tool directly.

react

Type: boolean
Default: false

Adds eslint-plugin-react, eslint-plugin-react-hooks, and eslint-config-xo-react to get all the React best practices applied automatically.

TypeScript

XO will automatically lint TypeScript files (.ts, .mts, .cts, and .tsx) with the rules defined in eslint-config-xo-typescript#use-with-xo.

XO will handle the @typescript-eslint/parser project option automatically even if you don't have a tsconfig.json in your project.

Usage as an ESLint Configuration

With the introduction of the ESLint flat config, many of the original goals of xo were brought into the ESLint core, and shareable configs with plugins became possible. Although we highly recommend the use of the xo cli, we understand that some teams need to rely on ESLint directly.

For these purposes, you can still get most of the features of xo by using our ESLint configuration helpers.

xoToEslintConfig

The xoToEslintConfig function is designed for use in an eslint.config.js file. It is NOT for use in an xo.config.js file. This function takes a FlatXoConfig and outputs an ESLint config object. This function will neither be able to automatically handle TS integration for you nor automatic Prettier integration. You are responsible for configuring your other tools appropriately. The xo cli, will however, handle all of these details for you.

eslint.config.js

import xo from 'xo';

export default xo.xoToEslintConfig([{space: true, prettier: 'compat'}]);

Tips

Monorepo

Put a xo.config.js with your config at the root and do not add a config to any of your bundled packages.

Including files ignored by default

To include files that XO ignores by default, add them as negative globs in the ignores option:

const xoConfig = [{ignores: ['!vendor/**']}];

export default xoConfig;

FAQ

What does XO mean?

It means hugs and kisses.

Why not Standard?

The Standard style is a really cool idea. I too wish we could have one style to rule them all! But the reality is that the JS community is just too diverse and opinionated to create one code style. They also made the mistake of pushing their own style instead of the most popular one. In contrast, XO is more pragmatic and has no aspiration of being the style. My goal with XO is to make it simple to enforce consistent code style with close to no config. XO comes with my code style preference by default, as I mainly made it for myself, but everything is configurable.

Why not ESLint?

XO is based on ESLint. This project started out as just a shareable ESLint config, but it quickly grew out of that. I wanted something even simpler. Just typing xo and be done. No decision-making. No config. I also have some exciting future plans for it. However, you can still get most of the XO benefits while using ESLint directly with the ESLint shareable config.

Editor plugins

Build-system plugins

Configs

Support

Related

Badge

Show the world you're using XO → XO code style

[![XO code style](https://shields.io/badge/code_style-5ed9c7?logo=xo&labelColor=gray&logoSize=auto)](https://github.com/xojs/xo)

Or customize the badge.

You can also find some nice dynamic XO badges on badgen.net.

Team

Former

NPM DownloadsLast 30 Days