Pros of React

• Larger ecosystem and community support
• More mature and battle-tested in production environments
• Extensive documentation and learning resources

Cons of React

• Larger bundle size and potential performance overhead
• Steeper learning curve for beginners
• Requires additional tools for state management in complex applications

Code Comparison

React:

function Welcome(props) {
  return <h1>Hello, {props.name}</h1>;
}

const element = <Welcome name="Sara" />;

Yew:

use yew::prelude::*;

#[function_component(Welcome)]
fn welcome(props: &Props) -> Html {
    html! { <h1>{ format!("Hello, {}", props.name) }</h1> }
}

html! { <Welcome name="Sara" /> }

Both frameworks use a component-based architecture and support JSX-like syntax. React uses JavaScript, while Yew leverages Rust's strong typing and performance benefits. Yew's syntax is more verbose due to Rust's stricter type system, but it offers better performance and smaller bundle sizes. React's ecosystem is more extensive, making it easier to find solutions and third-party libraries. Yew, being newer and Rust-based, has a smaller community but is growing rapidly, especially for WebAssembly applications.

Pros of Vue

• Larger ecosystem and community support
• More mature and battle-tested in production environments
• Extensive documentation and learning resources

Cons of Vue

• Larger bundle size compared to Yew
• Potentially slower performance due to JavaScript runtime
• Less type safety compared to Rust-based Yew

Code Comparison

Vue component:

<template>
  <div>{{ message }}</div>
</template>

<script>
export default {
  data() {
    return {
      message: 'Hello, Vue!'
    }
  }
}
</script>

Yew component:

use yew::prelude::*;

#[function_component]
fn App() -> Html {
    let message = "Hello, Yew!";
    html! { <div>{ message }</div> }
}

Vue uses a template-based approach with separate script and template sections, while Yew leverages Rust's type system and macros for a more concise and type-safe component definition. Vue's syntax may be more familiar to web developers, but Yew offers stronger compile-time guarantees and potentially better performance due to its Rust foundation.

Pros of Svelte

• Smaller bundle sizes due to compile-time optimization
• Simpler syntax with less boilerplate code
• Faster runtime performance, especially for complex UIs

Cons of Svelte

• Smaller ecosystem and community compared to Yew
• Limited support for server-side rendering
• Steeper learning curve for developers familiar with traditional frameworks

Code Comparison

Svelte component:

<script>
  let count = 0;
  const increment = () => count += 1;
</script>

<button on:click={increment}>
  Clicks: {count}
</button>

Yew component:

use yew::prelude::*;

pub struct Counter {
    count: i32,
}

impl Component for Counter {
    type Message = ();
    type Properties = ();

    fn create(_ctx: &Context<Self>) -> Self {
        Self { count: 0 }
    }

    fn update(&mut self, _ctx: &Context<Self>, _msg: Self::Message) -> bool {
        self.count += 1;
        true
    }

    fn view(&self, ctx: &Context<Self>) -> Html {
        html! {
            <button onclick={ctx.link().callback(|_| ())}>
                { format!("Clicks: {}", self.count) }
            </button>
        }
    }
}

Pros of Angular

• Mature ecosystem with extensive documentation and community support
• Comprehensive framework with built-in features like routing and dependency injection
• Powerful CLI for scaffolding and development tasks

Cons of Angular

• Steeper learning curve due to its complexity and TypeScript requirement
• Larger bundle size, potentially impacting initial load times
• More opinionated structure, which may limit flexibility in some cases

Code Comparison

Angular component:

@Component({
  selector: 'app-hello',
  template: '<h1>Hello, {{name}}!</h1>'
})
export class HelloComponent {
  name: string = 'World';
}

Yew component:

use yew::prelude::*;

#[function_component(Hello)]
pub fn hello() -> Html {
    let name = "World";
    html! { <h1>{ format!("Hello, {}!", name) }</h1> }
}

Summary

Angular is a mature, feature-rich framework with strong tooling support, ideal for large-scale applications. Yew, being newer and Rust-based, offers a lighter-weight alternative with potential performance benefits. Angular's TypeScript foundation provides robust type checking, while Yew leverages Rust's safety features. The choice between them depends on project requirements, team expertise, and performance considerations.

Pros of Solid

• Smaller bundle size and faster runtime performance
• Fine-grained reactivity without a virtual DOM
• Simpler mental model with fewer abstractions

Cons of Solid

• Smaller ecosystem and community compared to Yew
• Less mature, with potential for more frequent breaking changes
• Limited native mobile support

Code Comparison

Yew:

use yew::prelude::*;

#[function_component(App)]
fn app() -> Html {
    let counter = use_state(|| 0);
    let onclick = {
        let counter = counter.clone();
        Callback::from(move |_| counter.set(*counter + 1))
    };

    html! {
        <div>
            <button {onclick}>{ "+1" }</button>
            <p>{ *counter }</p>
        </div>
    }
}

Solid:

import { createSignal } from "solid-js";

function App() {
  const [count, setCount] = createSignal(0);
  return (
    <div>
      <button onClick={() => setCount(count() + 1)}>+1</button>
      <p>{count()}</p>
    </div>
  );
}

Pros of Preact

• Smaller bundle size and faster performance
• Easier learning curve for developers familiar with React
• Extensive ecosystem and community support

Cons of Preact

• Less type safety compared to Yew's Rust-based approach
• Limited built-in state management solutions
• Potentially more challenging for developers without JavaScript experience

Code Comparison

Preact:

import { h, render } from 'preact';

const App = () => <h1>Hello, World!</h1>;

render(<App />, document.body);

Yew:

use yew::prelude::*;

#[function_component(App)]
fn app() -> Html {
    html! { <h1>{"Hello, World!"}</h1> }
}

fn main() {
    yew::start_app::<App>();
}

Both Yew and Preact are popular choices for building web applications, but they cater to different developer preferences and project requirements. Preact offers a lightweight alternative to React with familiar syntax, while Yew leverages Rust's strong typing and performance benefits. The choice between them often depends on factors such as team expertise, project scale, and specific performance needs.