Pros of googler

• More focused on Google search functionality, providing advanced options specific to Google
• Supports Google News, Google Site Search, and Google Scholar
• Offers colorized output for better readability in the terminal

Cons of googler

• Limited to Google search only, while s supports multiple search engines
• Requires Python installation, whereas s is a standalone binary
• Less frequently updated compared to s

Code comparison

googler:

def fetch_results(url):
    response = urlopen(url)
    return response.read().decode('utf-8')

s:

func (e *Engine) Search(ctx context.Context, query string) (*SearchResponse, error) {
    url := e.BuildURL(query)
    return e.FetchResults(ctx, url)
}

The code snippets show basic result fetching functions. googler uses Python's urlopen, while s employs a more structured approach with Go's context and custom types.

Both projects aim to provide command-line search capabilities, but s offers a broader range of search engines and a simpler installation process. googler, on the other hand, provides more Google-specific features and a colorized output. The choice between them depends on whether you need multi-engine support or prefer Google-focused functionality.

Pros of searx

• Self-hosted and privacy-focused metasearch engine
• Highly customizable with many configuration options
• Supports a wide range of search engines and services

Cons of searx

• More complex setup and maintenance
• Requires server infrastructure to host
• May have slower response times due to aggregating multiple sources

Code comparison

searx (Python):

results = []
for engine in engines:
    engine_results = engine.search(query)
    results.extend(engine_results)

s (Go):

func Search(query string, provider string) {
    url := fmt.Sprintf(providers[provider], url.QueryEscape(query))
    open.Run(url)
}

searx is a more comprehensive metasearch engine that aggregates results from multiple sources, while s is a simpler command-line tool for quickly opening web searches in a browser. searx offers more privacy and customization but requires more setup, whereas s is easier to use but less feature-rich.

searx is better suited for users who prioritize privacy and want a self-hosted solution with extensive customization options. s is ideal for users who want a quick and easy way to perform web searches from the command line without additional infrastructure.

Pros of awesome-cli-apps

• Comprehensive collection of CLI apps across various categories
• Community-driven with regular updates and contributions
• Serves as a valuable resource for discovering new CLI tools

Cons of awesome-cli-apps

• Not a standalone application, just a curated list
• Requires manual installation of individual apps
• May include outdated or deprecated tools

Code comparison

s:

func main() {
    flags := parseFlags()
    query := strings.Join(flag.Args(), " ")
    provider := s.NewProvider(flags)
    url := provider.BuildURI(query)
    s.DisplayURL(url)
    s.OpenURI(url)
}

awesome-cli-apps:

## Entertainment

- [football-cli](https://github.com/ManrajGrover/football-cli) - Get live scores, fixtures, standings of almost every football competition/league.
- [pockyt](https://github.com/achembarpu/pockyt) - Read, manage, and automate your [Pocket](https://getpocket.com) collection.
- [newsboat](https://github.com/newsboat/newsboat) - An RSS/Atom feed reader for the text console.

Summary

s is a command-line tool for quick web searches, while awesome-cli-apps is a curated list of CLI applications. s provides a specific functionality, whereas awesome-cli-apps offers a wide range of tools for various purposes. s is more focused and requires less setup, while awesome-cli-apps provides a broader selection but requires individual app installations.

Pros of cheat.sh

• Provides a vast collection of cheat sheets and code snippets for various programming languages and tools
• Offers a command-line interface and a web-based interface for easy access
• Supports multiple output formats, including plain text, colorized output, and syntax highlighting

Cons of cheat.sh

• Limited to providing pre-defined cheat sheets and snippets
• May not always have the most up-to-date information for rapidly evolving technologies

Code comparison

cheat.sh:

curl cheat.sh/python/list

s:

s python list

Key differences

• cheat.sh focuses on providing quick access to cheat sheets and code snippets
• s is a command-line search utility that queries various search engines and websites
• cheat.sh is more specialized for programming-related queries, while s offers broader search capabilities
• s allows users to customize search providers and open results in a web browser
• cheat.sh provides more detailed and curated information for specific programming topics

Both tools serve different purposes: cheat.sh is ideal for quick programming reference, while s is better suited for general web searches from the command line.