Pros of subconverter

• More comprehensive conversion capabilities, supporting a wider range of proxy protocols
• Backend-focused, offering greater flexibility for integration into various systems
• Actively maintained with frequent updates and improvements

Cons of subconverter

• Requires more technical knowledge to set up and configure
• Lacks a built-in user interface, making it less accessible for non-technical users
• May require additional resources to run as a backend service

Code Comparison

sub-web (Vue.js frontend):

export default {
  data() {
    return {
      sourceSubUrl: '',
      targetSubUrl: '',
      customBackend: ''
    }
  },
  // ...
}

subconverter (C++ backend):

int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
    init();
    if(argc > 1 && strcmp(argv[1], "-cfw") == 0)
        cfw_child_process();
    else
        start_web_server();
    return 0;
}

sub-web focuses on providing a user-friendly interface for subscription conversion, while subconverter offers a powerful backend engine for handling complex conversion tasks. sub-web is more suitable for end-users who prefer a graphical interface, whereas subconverter is better for developers and advanced users who need more control and integration options.

Pros of ACL4SSR

• More comprehensive rule sets for content filtering and ad blocking
• Regularly updated with community contributions
• Includes pre-configured lists for popular services and regions

Cons of ACL4SSR

• Primarily focused on rule sets, lacking a user-friendly interface
• May require more technical knowledge to implement and customize
• Limited documentation in English

Code Comparison

sub-web:

export function getShortId(id) {
  return id.split('-')[0]
}

ACL4SSR:

[custom]
;不要随意改变关键字，否则会导致出错
;acl4SSR规则

;设置规则标志位
ruleset=🎯 全球直连,rules/ACL4SSR/Clash/LocalAreaNetwork.list

The code snippets highlight the different focus areas of the two projects. sub-web emphasizes frontend functionality, while ACL4SSR concentrates on rule configurations for network filtering.

sub-web provides a more user-friendly interface for subscription management, while ACL4SSR offers extensive rule sets for content filtering and ad blocking. ACL4SSR may require more technical expertise to implement, but it provides more comprehensive and regularly updated rules for various services and regions.

Pros of SS-Rule-Snippet

• Provides a comprehensive set of rules for various proxy tools and platforms
• Regularly updated with new rules and optimizations
• Offers detailed documentation and usage instructions

Cons of SS-Rule-Snippet

• Requires manual configuration and integration with proxy tools
• May have a steeper learning curve for beginners
• Limited customization options without modifying the rule files directly

Code Comparison

SS-Rule-Snippet (Surge configuration example):

[Rule]
DOMAIN-SUFFIX,googleapis.com,Proxy
DOMAIN-SUFFIX,instagram.com,Proxy
DOMAIN-SUFFIX,cdninstagram.com,Proxy
DOMAIN-SUFFIX,fbcdn.net,Proxy
DOMAIN-SUFFIX,facebook.com,Proxy

sub-web (Vue.js component example):

<template>
  <div class="subscription-card">
    <el-card>
      <div slot="header" class="clearfix">
        <span>{{ name }}</span>
      </div>
      <div class="text item">
        {{ url }}
      </div>
    </el-card>
  </div>
</template>

While SS-Rule-Snippet focuses on providing pre-configured rule sets, sub-web offers a web-based interface for managing and converting proxy subscriptions. SS-Rule-Snippet is more suitable for users who prefer direct rule management, while sub-web caters to those who want a user-friendly GUI for subscription handling.

Pros of clash-rules

• Focuses specifically on providing rule sets for Clash, making it more specialized
• Regularly updated with the latest domain lists and IP ranges
• Offers a variety of rule sets for different purposes (e.g., ads, streaming, gaming)

Cons of clash-rules

• Limited to rule sets only, doesn't provide a user interface or subscription conversion
• Requires more technical knowledge to implement and use effectively
• May need additional tools or scripts to integrate with Clash clients

Code comparison

sub-web:

export function getClashType() {
  return localStorage.getItem('clash_type') || 'clash';
}

clash-rules:

payload:
  - DOMAIN-SUFFIX,googleapis.cn
  - DOMAIN-SUFFIX,googleapis.com
  - DOMAIN-SUFFIX,google.cn

Summary

sub-web is a web-based tool for converting and managing proxy subscriptions, offering a user-friendly interface. clash-rules, on the other hand, focuses solely on providing up-to-date rule sets for Clash. While sub-web offers more versatility in subscription management, clash-rules excels in maintaining specific, curated rule sets for various purposes. The choice between the two depends on whether you need a comprehensive subscription management tool or specialized rule sets for Clash.