IdentityModel
.NET standard helper library for claims-based identity, OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect.
Top Related Projects
OpenID Connect and OAuth 2.0 Framework for ASP.NET Core
Flexible and versatile OAuth 2.0/OpenID Connect stack for .NET
IdentityModel extensions for .Net
.NET standard helper library for claims-based identity, OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect.
ASP.NET Core is a cross-platform .NET framework for building modern cloud-based web applications on Windows, Mac, or Linux.
ASP.NET Core is a cross-platform .NET framework for building modern cloud-based web applications on Windows, Mac, or Linux.
Quick Overview
IdentityModel is a .NET library that provides a set of helper classes and methods for working with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect protocols. It simplifies the process of implementing authentication and authorization in .NET applications, offering a high-level abstraction for common identity-related tasks.
Pros
- Simplifies OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect implementation
- Provides a consistent API across different .NET platforms
- Regularly updated and maintained by the community
- Extensive documentation and examples available
Cons
- Learning curve for developers new to OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect
- May require additional configuration for complex scenarios
- Dependency on external identity providers
- Limited built-in support for some less common authentication flows
Code Examples
- Requesting an access token using client credentials:
var client = new HttpClient();
var response = await client.RequestClientCredentialsTokenAsync(new ClientCredentialsTokenRequest
{
Address = "https://demo.identityserver.io/connect/token",
ClientId = "client",
ClientSecret = "secret",
Scope = "api1"
});
var token = response.AccessToken;
- Performing token introspection:
var client = new HttpClient();
var response = await client.IntrospectTokenAsync(new TokenIntrospectionRequest
{
Address = "https://demo.identityserver.io/connect/introspect",
ClientId = "resource1",
ClientSecret = "secret",
Token = "access_token_to_introspect"
});
var isActive = response.IsActive;
- Parsing a JWT token:
var handler = new JwtSecurityTokenHandler();
var jsonToken = handler.ReadToken("your_jwt_token_here");
var tokenS = jsonToken as JwtSecurityToken;
var claims = tokenS.Claims;
Getting Started
To get started with IdentityModel, follow these steps:
-
Install the NuGet package:
dotnet add package IdentityModel
-
Import the necessary namespaces in your code:
using IdentityModel.Client; using System.Net.Http;
-
Use the library to perform identity-related tasks, such as requesting tokens or validating claims, as shown in the code examples above.
Competitor Comparisons
OpenID Connect and OAuth 2.0 Framework for ASP.NET Core
Pros of IdentityServer4
- More comprehensive and feature-rich identity and access control solution
- Extensive documentation and community support
- Implements OpenID Connect and OAuth 2.0 protocols
Cons of IdentityServer4
- Steeper learning curve due to its complexity
- Requires more setup and configuration
- Discontinued for new projects (replaced by Duende IdentityServer)
Code Comparison
IdentityServer4:
services.AddIdentityServer()
.AddInMemoryClients(Config.Clients)
.AddInMemoryIdentityResources(Config.IdentityResources)
.AddInMemoryApiResources(Config.ApiResources)
.AddInMemoryApiScopes(Config.ApiScopes)
.AddTestUsers(Config.Users);
IdentityModel:
var client = new HttpClient();
var disco = await client.GetDiscoveryDocumentAsync("https://demo.identityserver.io");
var tokenResponse = await client.RequestClientCredentialsTokenAsync(new ClientCredentialsTokenRequest
{
Address = disco.TokenEndpoint,
ClientId = "client",
ClientSecret = "secret",
Scope = "api1"
});
IdentityServer4 provides a more comprehensive setup for identity and access control, while IdentityModel offers simpler client-side interactions with identity providers. IdentityServer4 is better suited for complex scenarios, whereas IdentityModel is more lightweight and focused on client-side operations.
Flexible and versatile OAuth 2.0/OpenID Connect stack for .NET
Pros of OpenIddict
- More comprehensive OpenID Connect and OAuth 2.0 server implementation
- Supports additional features like token introspection and revocation
- Actively maintained with regular updates and community support
Cons of OpenIddict
- Steeper learning curve due to its extensive feature set
- May be overkill for simpler authentication scenarios
- Requires more configuration and setup compared to IdentityModel
Code Comparison
IdentityModel (Client-side token request):
var client = new HttpClient();
var response = await client.RequestClientCredentialsTokenAsync(new ClientCredentialsTokenRequest
{
Address = "https://demo.identityserver.io/connect/token",
ClientId = "client",
ClientSecret = "secret",
Scope = "api1"
});
OpenIddict (Server-side token generation):
var descriptor = new AuthorizationDescriptor
{
Client = await _applicationManager.FindByClientIdAsync("client_id"),
Principal = principal,
Scopes = { "api1" }
};
var authorization = await _authorizationManager.CreateAsync(descriptor);
var token = await _tokenManager.CreateAccessTokenAsync(authorization);
Both libraries provide functionality for handling OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect protocols, but OpenIddict offers a more complete server-side implementation while IdentityModel focuses on client-side operations and helpers for working with tokens and protocols.
IdentityModel extensions for .Net
Pros of azure-activedirectory-identitymodel-extensions-for-dotnet
- Extensive support for Azure AD and Microsoft identity platform
- Comprehensive documentation and samples for Microsoft-specific scenarios
- Regular updates and maintenance by Microsoft
Cons of azure-activedirectory-identitymodel-extensions-for-dotnet
- More complex and heavyweight compared to IdentityModel
- Primarily focused on Microsoft technologies, less flexible for other identity providers
- Steeper learning curve for developers not familiar with Azure AD
Code Comparison
IdentityModel:
var client = new HttpClient();
var response = await client.RequestClientCredentialsTokenAsync(new ClientCredentialsTokenRequest
{
Address = "https://demo.identityserver.io/connect/token",
ClientId = "client",
ClientSecret = "secret",
Scope = "api1"
});
azure-activedirectory-identitymodel-extensions-for-dotnet:
var config = new ConfigurationBuilder().AddJsonFile("appsettings.json").Build();
var options = new ConfidentialClientApplicationOptions();
config.Bind("AzureAd", options);
var app = ConfidentialClientApplicationBuilder.CreateWithApplicationOptions(options).Build();
var result = await app.AcquireTokenForClient(new[] { "https://graph.microsoft.com/.default" }).ExecuteAsync();
The code comparison shows that IdentityModel offers a more straightforward approach for general OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect scenarios, while azure-activedirectory-identitymodel-extensions-for-dotnet provides a more Azure AD-specific implementation with additional configuration options.
.NET standard helper library for claims-based identity, OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect.
Pros of IdentityModel
- More comprehensive documentation and examples
- Wider range of supported authentication protocols
- Active community support and regular updates
Cons of IdentityModel
- Slightly more complex setup process
- Higher learning curve for beginners
- Larger codebase, which may impact performance in some scenarios
Code Comparison
IdentityModel:
var client = new HttpClient();
var disco = await client.GetDiscoveryDocumentAsync("https://demo.identityserver.io");
var tokenResponse = await client.RequestClientCredentialsTokenAsync(new ClientCredentialsTokenRequest
{
Address = disco.TokenEndpoint,
ClientId = "client",
ClientSecret = "secret",
Scope = "api1"
});
IdentityModel>:
var client = new HttpClient();
var response = await client.RequestTokenAsync(new TokenRequest
{
Address = "https://demo.identityserver.io/connect/token",
GrantType = "client_credentials",
ClientId = "client",
ClientSecret = "secret"
});
The code comparison shows that IdentityModel> has a more streamlined approach to token requests, while IdentityModel offers more granular control over the process. IdentityModel requires an additional step to retrieve the discovery document, which can be beneficial for more complex scenarios but may be unnecessary for simpler use cases.
ASP.NET Core is a cross-platform .NET framework for building modern cloud-based web applications on Windows, Mac, or Linux.
Pros of aspnetcore
- Comprehensive framework for building web applications and services
- Extensive documentation and community support
- Regular updates and maintenance by Microsoft
Cons of aspnetcore
- Larger codebase, potentially more complex for simple projects
- May include unnecessary components for specific use cases
Code Comparison
IdentityModel (OpenID Connect client):
var client = new HttpClient();
var disco = await client.GetDiscoveryDocumentAsync("https://demo.identityserver.io");
var tokenResponse = await client.RequestClientCredentialsTokenAsync(new ClientCredentialsTokenRequest
{
Address = disco.TokenEndpoint,
ClientId = "client",
ClientSecret = "secret",
Scope = "api1"
});
aspnetcore (OpenID Connect middleware):
services.AddAuthentication(options =>
{
options.DefaultScheme = "Cookies";
options.DefaultChallengeScheme = "oidc";
})
.AddCookie("Cookies")
.AddOpenIdConnect("oidc", options =>
{
options.Authority = "https://demo.identityserver.io";
options.ClientId = "interactive.public";
options.ClientSecret = "secret";
options.ResponseType = "code";
options.SaveTokens = true;
});
IdentityModel focuses on OpenID Connect and OAuth 2.0 client libraries, while aspnetcore provides a full-stack web development framework. IdentityModel offers more flexibility for custom implementations, whereas aspnetcore provides integrated authentication middleware for easier setup in ASP.NET Core applications.
ASP.NET Core is a cross-platform .NET framework for building modern cloud-based web applications on Windows, Mac, or Linux.
Pros of aspnetcore
- Comprehensive framework for building web applications and services
- Extensive documentation and community support
- Regular updates and maintenance by Microsoft
Cons of aspnetcore
- Larger codebase, potentially more complex for simple projects
- May include unnecessary components for specific use cases
Code Comparison
IdentityModel (OpenID Connect client):
var client = new HttpClient();
var disco = await client.GetDiscoveryDocumentAsync("https://demo.identityserver.io");
var tokenResponse = await client.RequestClientCredentialsTokenAsync(new ClientCredentialsTokenRequest
{
Address = disco.TokenEndpoint,
ClientId = "client",
ClientSecret = "secret",
Scope = "api1"
});
aspnetcore (OpenID Connect middleware):
services.AddAuthentication(options =>
{
options.DefaultScheme = "Cookies";
options.DefaultChallengeScheme = "oidc";
})
.AddCookie("Cookies")
.AddOpenIdConnect("oidc", options =>
{
options.Authority = "https://demo.identityserver.io";
options.ClientId = "interactive.public";
options.ClientSecret = "secret";
options.ResponseType = "code";
options.SaveTokens = true;
});
IdentityModel focuses on OpenID Connect and OAuth 2.0 client libraries, while aspnetcore provides a full-stack web development framework. IdentityModel offers more flexibility for custom implementations, whereas aspnetcore provides integrated authentication middleware for easier setup in ASP.NET Core applications.
Convert
designs to code with AI
Introducing Visual Copilot: A new AI model to turn Figma designs to high quality code using your components.
Try Visual CopilotREADME
About IdentityModel
IdentityModel is a .NET library for claims-based identity, OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect.
[!IMPORTANT]
IdentityModel
is being rebranded toDuende.IdentityModel
and henceforth will be managed in our FOSS repository under the same Apache2 licence.
- Please update your nuget package references to the new package.
- Outstanding pull requests and issues will be ported or closed.
It provides an object model to interact with the endpoints defined in the various OAuth and OpenId Connect specifications in the form of:
- types to represent the requests and responses
- extension methods to invoke requests
- constants defined in the specifications, such as standard scope, claim, and parameter names
- other convenience methods for performing common identity related operations
IdentityModel targets .NET Standard 2.0, making it suitable for .NET and .NET Framework.
For more documentation, please visit readthedocs.
Related Packages
- Certified OIDC client library for native apps: IdentityModel.OidcClient
- Id token validator for IdentityModel.OidcClient based on the Microsoft JWT handler: IdentityModel.OidcClient.IdentityTokenValidator
- DPoP extensions for IdentityModel.OidcClient: IdentityModel.OidcClient.DPoP
- Authentication handler for introspection tokens: IdentityModel.AspNetCore.OAuth2Introspection
Feedback
IdentityModel is released as open source under the Apache 2.0 license. Bug reports and contributions are welcome at the GitHub repository.
Top Related Projects
OpenID Connect and OAuth 2.0 Framework for ASP.NET Core
Flexible and versatile OAuth 2.0/OpenID Connect stack for .NET
IdentityModel extensions for .Net
.NET standard helper library for claims-based identity, OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect.
ASP.NET Core is a cross-platform .NET framework for building modern cloud-based web applications on Windows, Mac, or Linux.
ASP.NET Core is a cross-platform .NET framework for building modern cloud-based web applications on Windows, Mac, or Linux.
Convert
designs to code with AI
Introducing Visual Copilot: A new AI model to turn Figma designs to high quality code using your components.
Try Visual Copilot