Pros of litemall

• More comprehensive e-commerce solution, including both frontend and backend components
• Supports multiple platforms: WeChat Mini Program, Web, and Mobile H5
• Includes admin dashboard for easier management

Cons of litemall

• More complex setup and configuration due to its comprehensive nature
• Potentially steeper learning curve for developers new to the stack
• May include unnecessary features for simpler e-commerce projects

Code Comparison

wechat-app-mall (WeChat Mini Program frontend):

Page({
  data: {
    goodsList: [],
    categories: []
  },
  onLoad: function() {
    this.getCategories();
    this.getGoodsList();
  }
})

litemall (Vue.js frontend):

export default {
  data() {
    return {
      goodsList: [],
      categories: []
    }
  },
  created() {
    this.getCategories();
    this.getGoodsList();
  }
}

Both projects use similar structures for managing product listings and categories. However, litemall uses Vue.js, which offers more flexibility for cross-platform development, while wechat-app-mall is specifically tailored for WeChat Mini Programs.

Pros of nideshop-mini-program

• More comprehensive backend implementation with Node.js and MySQL
• Includes a separate admin panel for managing the e-commerce platform
• Better documentation and setup instructions for developers

Cons of nideshop-mini-program

• Less frequent updates and maintenance compared to wechat-app-mall
• Smaller community and fewer contributors
• May require more setup and configuration due to its more complex architecture

Code Comparison

wechat-app-mall (App.js):

App({
  onLaunch: function () {
    const that = this;
    // 检测新版本
    const updateManager = wx.getUpdateManager();
    updateManager.onUpdateReady(function () {
      wx.showModal({
        title: '更新提示',
        content: '新版本已经准备好，是否重启应用？',
        success: function (res) {
          if (res.confirm) {
            // 新的版本已经下载好，调用 applyUpdate 应用新版本并重启
            updateManager.applyUpdate();
          }
        }
      })
    })
    /**
     * 初次加载判断网络情况
     * 无网络状态下根据实际情况进行调整
     */
    wx.getNetworkType({
      success: function (res) {
        const networkType = res.networkType;
        if (networkType === 'none') {
          that.globalData.isConnected = false;
          wx.showToast({
            title: '当前无网络',
            icon: 'loading',
            duration: 2000
          })
        }
      }
    });
  },
  globalData: {
    isConnected: true
  }
})

nideshop-mini-program (app.js):

App({
  onLaunch: function () {
    //调用API从本地缓存中获取数据
    var logs = wx.getStorageSync('logs') || []
    logs.unshift(Date.now())
    wx.setStorageSync('logs', logs)
  },
  getUserInfo: function (cb) {
    var that = this
    if (this.globalData.userInfo) {
      typeof cb == "function" && cb(this.globalData.userInfo)
    } else {
      //调用登录接口
      wx.login({
        success: function () {
          wx.getUserInfo({
            success: function (res) {
              that.globalData.userInfo = res.userInfo
              typeof cb == "function" && cb(that.globalData.userInfo)
            }
          })
        }
      })
    }
  },
  globalData: {
    userInfo: null
  }
})

Pros of wechat-weapp-mall

• Simpler and more lightweight implementation
• Easier to understand and modify for beginners
• Focuses on core e-commerce functionality without extra features

Cons of wechat-weapp-mall

• Less comprehensive feature set compared to wechat-app-mall
• Fewer active contributors and updates
• Limited documentation and support

Code Comparison

wechat-weapp-mall:

// app.js
App({
  onLaunch: function () {
    // Do something when launch
  },
  globalData: {
    userInfo: null
  }
})

wechat-app-mall:

// app.js
App({
  onLaunch: function () {
    const that = this;
    // 检测新版本
    const updateManager = wx.getUpdateManager()
    updateManager.onUpdateReady(function () {
      wx.showModal({
        title: '更新提示',
        content: '新版本已经准备好，是否重启应用？',
        success(res) {
          if (res.confirm) {
            // 新的版本已经下载好，调用 applyUpdate 应用新版本并重启
            updateManager.applyUpdate()
          }
        }
      })
    })
    // ...
  },
  // ...
})

The code comparison shows that wechat-app-mall includes additional functionality for version updates, while wechat-weapp-mall has a simpler implementation. This reflects the overall difference in complexity and feature set between the two projects.

Pros of m-mall

• More comprehensive UI components and layouts
• Better organized codebase with clearer separation of concerns
• Includes additional features like user authentication and order management

Cons of m-mall

• Less frequently updated compared to wechat-app-mall
• Smaller community and fewer contributors
• May require more setup and configuration due to its complexity

Code Comparison

m-mall (App.js):

App({
  onLaunch() {
    this.getUserInfo()
    this.setSystemInfo()
  },
  getUserInfo() {
    // User authentication logic
  },
  setSystemInfo() {
    // Set system information
  }
})

wechat-app-mall (app.js):

App({
  onLaunch: function() {
    const that = this;
    // 展示本地存储能力
    var logs = wx.getStorageSync('logs') || []
    logs.unshift(Date.now())
    wx.setStorageSync('logs', logs)
    // 登录
    wx.login({
      success: res => {
        // 发送 res.code 到后台换取 openId, sessionKey, unionId
      }
    })
  },
  globalData: {
    userInfo: null
  }
})

The m-mall code shows a more modular approach with separate methods for user info and system info, while wechat-app-mall combines these in the onLaunch function. m-mall's structure may be easier to maintain and extend, but wechat-app-mall's approach is more straightforward for simpler applications.