Pros of wechat-app-mall

• More active development with frequent updates and contributions
• Comprehensive documentation and setup instructions
• Wider range of features including user management and order processing

Cons of wechat-app-mall

• More complex codebase, potentially harder to customize
• Heavier reliance on external services and APIs

Code Comparison

m-mall:

Page({
  data: {
    items: [],
    hidden: !0,
    hasMore: !0,
    page: 1,
    limit: 10,
  },
  onLoad() {
    this.getList()
  },
})

wechat-app-mall:

Page({
  data: {
    goodsDetail: {},
    selectSizePrice: 0,
    selectSizeOPrice: 0,
    totalScoreToPay: 0,
    shopNum: 0,
    hideShopPopup: true,
    buyNumber: 0,
    buyNumMin: 1,
    buyNumMax: 0,
  },
  onLoad(e) {
    this.data.goodsId = e.id
    this.data.kjJoinUid = e.kjJoinUid
    this.getGoodsDetail(this.data.goodsId)
  },
})

The wechat-app-mall code snippet shows a more detailed and feature-rich implementation, with additional properties and methods for handling product details, pricing, and shopping cart functionality. In contrast, the m-mall code is simpler and focuses on basic list loading functionality.

Pros of litemall

• More comprehensive e-commerce solution with admin, API, and Vue storefront
• Better documentation and setup instructions
• More active development and larger community (3.5k+ stars vs 1.5k+)

Cons of litemall

• More complex architecture, potentially harder to customize
• Heavier resource requirements due to its full-stack nature
• Steeper learning curve for developers new to the tech stack

Code Comparison

m-mall (WeChat Mini Program):

Page({
  data: {
    goods: {},
    total: 0,
    prompt: {
      hidden: !0,
    },
  },
  onLoad() {
    this.getGoods()
  },
})

litemall (Vue.js):

export default {
  data() {
    return {
      goods: {},
      total: 0,
      loading: false
    }
  },
  created() {
    this.getGoods()
  },
}

Both projects use similar data structures and lifecycle methods, but litemall uses Vue.js conventions while m-mall follows WeChat Mini Program patterns. litemall's code is more modular and easier to maintain in larger applications.

litemall offers a more complete e-commerce solution with better documentation and community support. However, it may be overkill for simpler projects where m-mall's lightweight approach could be more suitable. The choice between them depends on project requirements and developer expertise.

Pros of newbee-mall

• More comprehensive e-commerce features, including order management and payment integration
• Better documentation and setup instructions for easier deployment
• Active development with frequent updates and bug fixes

Cons of newbee-mall

• Larger codebase, potentially more complex to understand and maintain
• Requires more server resources due to its full-stack nature
• Less focus on mobile-specific optimizations compared to m-mall

Code Comparison

m-mall (WeChat Mini Program):

Page({
  data: {
    goods: [],
    prompt: {
      hidden: !0,
      icon: '../../../assets/images/iconfont-empty.png',
    },
  },
  onLoad() {
    this.getList()
  },
})

newbee-mall (Spring Boot):

@RestController
@Api(value = "v1", tags = "商品分类页面接口")
@RequestMapping("/api/v1")
public class NewBeeMallGoodsCategoryAPI {
    @Resource
    private NewBeeMallCategoryService newBeeMallCategoryService;

    @GetMapping("/categories")
    @ApiOperation(value = "获取分类数据", notes = "分类页面使用")
    public Result<List<NewBeeMallIndexCategoryVO>> getCategories() {
        List<NewBeeMallIndexCategoryVO> categories = newBeeMallCategoryService.getCategoriesForIndex();
        return ResultGenerator.genSuccessResult(categories);
    }
}

Pros of mall

• More comprehensive e-commerce solution with backend and frontend components
• Actively maintained with frequent updates and a larger community
• Extensive documentation and deployment guides

Cons of mall

• More complex architecture, potentially steeper learning curve
• Heavier resource requirements due to its full-stack nature

Code Comparison

mall (Java):

@ApiOperation("Add product to cart")
@RequestMapping(value = "/add", method = RequestMethod.POST)
@ResponseBody
public CommonResult add(@RequestBody OmsCartItem cartItem) {
    int count = cartItemService.add(cartItem);
    if (count > 0) {
        return CommonResult.success(count);
    }
    return CommonResult.failed();
}

m-mall (JavaScript):

addCart(params) {
    return this.post('/cart/add', params)
}

delCart(id) {
    return this.delete('/cart/delete', {
        id: id
    })
}

Key Differences

• mall is a full-stack Java-based e-commerce platform, while m-mall focuses on the frontend using WeChat Mini Program
• mall offers more features and scalability for larger projects
• m-mall is simpler and easier to get started with for small-scale applications
• mall has a more active community and regular updates
• m-mall's codebase is more concise and focused on frontend interactions

Pros of yudao-cloud

• More comprehensive and feature-rich enterprise-level application
• Actively maintained with frequent updates and contributions
• Extensive documentation and community support

Cons of yudao-cloud

• Higher complexity and steeper learning curve
• Requires more resources to run and deploy

Code Comparison

m-mall (JavaScript):

Page({
  data: {
    items: [],
    hasMore: !1,
    showLoading: !1,
    start: 0,
    limit: 10,
  },
  onLoad() {
    this.getItems()
  },
})

yudao-cloud (Java):

@RestController
@RequestMapping("/system/tenant")
@Validated
@Tag(name = "管理后台 - 租户")
public class TenantController {

    @PostMapping("/create")
    @Operation(summary = "创建租户")
    @PreAuthorize("@ss.hasPermission('system:tenant:create')")
    public CommonResult<Long> createTenant(@Valid @RequestBody TenantCreateReqVO createReqVO) {
        return success(tenantService.createTenant(createReqVO));
    }
}

The code comparison shows that m-mall is a simpler, frontend-focused project using JavaScript, while yudao-cloud is a more complex, backend-oriented Java application with advanced features like tenant management and role-based access control.