Pros of litemall

• Simpler architecture, making it easier to understand and maintain
• Includes a Vue-based admin dashboard out of the box
• Focuses on small to medium-sized e-commerce applications

Cons of litemall

• Less comprehensive feature set compared to mall
• Smaller community and fewer contributions
• Limited scalability for large-scale e-commerce platforms

Code Comparison

mall:

@Autowired
private UmsMemberService memberService;

@ApiOperation("获取验证码")
@GetMapping("/getAuthCode")
public CommonResult getAuthCode(@RequestParam String telephone) {
    return memberService.generateAuthCode(telephone);
}

litemall:

@Autowired
private LitemallUserService userService;

@PostMapping("register")
public Object register(@RequestBody String body) {
    String username = JacksonUtil.parseString(body, "username");
    String password = JacksonUtil.parseString(body, "password");
    String mobile = JacksonUtil.parseString(body, "mobile");
    String code = JacksonUtil.parseString(body, "code");
    
    if (StringUtils.isEmpty(username) || StringUtils.isEmpty(password) || StringUtils.isEmpty(mobile) || StringUtils.isEmpty(code)) {
        return ResponseUtil.badArgument();
    }
    
    return userService.register(username, password, mobile, code);
}

The code snippets show different approaches to user registration and authentication. mall uses a dedicated service for generating authentication codes, while litemall combines user registration with code verification in a single method.

Pros of zheng

• More comprehensive microservices architecture with a wider range of modules
• Includes additional features like SSO and API gateway
• Provides a more detailed project structure for large-scale applications

Cons of zheng

• Less active development and maintenance compared to mall
• Documentation is not as extensive or up-to-date
• May have a steeper learning curve due to its complexity

Code Comparison

zheng:

@Service
@Transactional
public class UserServiceImpl implements UserService {
    @Autowired
    private UserMapper userMapper;
    
    public UserVO getUserById(int userId) {
        return userMapper.selectByPrimaryKey(userId);
    }
}

mall:

@Service
public class UmsAdminServiceImpl implements UmsAdminService {
    @Autowired
    private UmsAdminMapper adminMapper;
    
    @Override
    public UmsAdmin getAdminByUsername(String username) {
        return adminMapper.selectByUsername(username);
    }
}

Both projects use similar service implementation patterns, but mall tends to have more focused and specific service methods, while zheng's services often cover broader functionality.

Pros of newbee-mall

• Simpler architecture, making it easier for beginners to understand and learn
• More focused on core e-commerce functionalities
• Includes a separate admin panel for managing the store

Cons of newbee-mall

• Less comprehensive feature set compared to mall
• Smaller community and fewer contributors
• Limited documentation and learning resources

Code Comparison

mall:

@Autowired
private UmsMemberService memberService;

@ApiOperation("获取验证码")
@GetMapping("/getAuthCode")
public CommonResult getAuthCode(@RequestParam String telephone) {
    return memberService.generateAuthCode(telephone);
}

newbee-mall:

@Autowired
private NewBeeMallUserService newBeeMallUserService;

@PostMapping("/login")
@ApiOperation(value = "登录接口", notes = "返回token")
public Result<String> login(@RequestBody @Valid LoginUserParam loginUserParam) {
    String loginResult = newBeeMallUserService.login(loginUserParam.getLoginName(), loginUserParam.getPasswordMd5());
    return ResultGenerator.genSuccessResult(loginResult);
}

Both projects use Spring Boot and follow similar coding patterns. However, mall tends to have more complex implementations with additional features, while newbee-mall focuses on simplicity and core functionalities.

Pros of paascloud-master

• More comprehensive microservices architecture, including service discovery and configuration management
• Includes a front-end component with Vue.js, offering a full-stack solution
• Provides detailed documentation and deployment guides for various cloud platforms

Cons of paascloud-master

• Less active development and community engagement compared to mall
• More complex setup and configuration, which may be challenging for beginners
• Fewer integrated e-commerce specific features out of the box

Code Comparison

paascloud-master (Spring Cloud Config):

@EnableConfigServer
@SpringBootApplication
public class PaasCloudConfigApplication {
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        SpringApplication.run(PaasCloudConfigApplication.class, args);
    }
}

mall (Spring Boot Configuration):

@Configuration
@EnableSwagger2
public class Swagger2Config {
    @Bean
    public Docket createRestApi() {
        return new Docket(DocumentationType.SWAGGER_2)
                .apiInfo(apiInfo())
                .select()
                .apis(RequestHandlerSelectors.basePackage("com.macro.mall.controller"))
                .paths(PathSelectors.any())
                .build();
    }
}

The code comparison shows that paascloud-master focuses on distributed configuration management, while mall emphasizes API documentation and testing with Swagger. This reflects the different architectural approaches of the two projects, with paascloud-master being more oriented towards microservices and mall towards a monolithic e-commerce platform.

Pros of supertest

• Focused on API testing, making it ideal for backend developers
• Lightweight and easy to integrate into existing Node.js projects
• Supports both callback and promise-based testing styles

Cons of supertest

• Limited to HTTP testing, unlike mall's comprehensive e-commerce functionality
• Requires additional libraries for more complex testing scenarios
• Less active community and fewer contributors compared to mall

Code Comparison

supertest:

const request = require('supertest');
const express = require('express');
const app = express();

request(app)
  .get('/user')
  .expect('Content-Type', /json/)
  .expect(200, done);

mall:

@Autowired
private PmsBrandService brandService;

@ApiOperation("获取所有品牌列表")
@RequestMapping(value = "listAll", method = RequestMethod.GET)
@ResponseBody
public CommonResult<List<PmsBrand>> getBrandList() {
    return CommonResult.success(brandService.listAllBrand());
}

Key Differences

• supertest is a testing library, while mall is a full e-commerce platform
• supertest is JavaScript-based, mall is Java-based
• mall offers a complete application structure, while supertest is a tool to be integrated into existing projects
• supertest focuses on HTTP assertions, while mall provides a wide range of e-commerce features

Pros of xxl-job

• Focused on distributed task scheduling, making it more specialized and potentially more efficient for this specific use case
• Lighter weight and easier to integrate into existing projects
• Provides a web-based management interface for job monitoring and configuration

Cons of xxl-job

• Limited to task scheduling functionality, whereas mall is a more comprehensive e-commerce solution
• Less active community and fewer contributors compared to mall
• Fewer integrations with other technologies and frameworks

Code Comparison

xxl-job:

XxlJobSpringExecutor xxlJobExecutor = new XxlJobSpringExecutor();
xxlJobExecutor.setAdminAddresses(adminAddresses);
xxlJobExecutor.setAppname(appname);
xxlJobExecutor.setIp(ip);
xxlJobExecutor.setPort(port);

mall:

@Configuration
@EnableSwagger2
public class Swagger2Config extends BaseSwaggerConfig {
    @Override
    public SwaggerProperties swaggerProperties() {
        return SwaggerProperties.builder()
                .apiBasePackage("com.macro.mall.controller")
                .title("mall后台系统")
                .description("mall后台相关接口文档")
                .contactName("macro")
                .version("1.0")
                .enableSecurity(true)
                .build();
    }
}