newbee-mall

Pros of mall

• More comprehensive and feature-rich e-commerce platform
• Better documentation and extensive wiki for developers
• Larger community and more frequent updates

Cons of mall

• Steeper learning curve due to its complexity
• Potentially overkill for smaller projects or simpler e-commerce needs
• Higher resource requirements for deployment and maintenance

Code Comparison

mall:

@Autowired
private UmsMemberService memberService;

@ApiOperation("获取验证码")
@RequestMapping(value = "/getAuthCode", method = RequestMethod.GET)
@ResponseBody
public CommonResult getAuthCode(@RequestParam String telephone) {
    return memberService.generateAuthCode(telephone);
}

newbee-mall:

@Autowired
private NewBeeMallUserService newBeeMallUserService;

@PostMapping("/login")
@ResponseBody
public Result login(@RequestParam("loginName") String loginName,
                    @RequestParam("verifyCode") String verifyCode,
                    @RequestParam("password") String password,
                    HttpSession httpSession) {
    if (!StringUtils.hasText(verifyCode)) {
        return ResultGenerator.genFailResult(ServiceResultEnum.LOGIN_VERIFY_CODE_NULL.getResult());
    }
    // ... (additional code)
}

The code comparison shows that mall uses a dedicated service for member-related operations, while newbee-mall handles user authentication directly in the controller. mall also utilizes Swagger annotations for API documentation.

Pros of litemall

• More comprehensive tech stack, including Vue and React for frontend
• Better documentation and project structure
• Active community with regular updates and contributions

Cons of litemall

• Steeper learning curve due to more complex architecture
• Potentially overkill for smaller projects
• Requires more resources to run and maintain

Code Comparison

litemall:

@RestController
@RequestMapping("/wx/order")
@Validated
public class WxOrderController {
    @Autowired
    private OrderService orderService;
    // ...
}

newbee-mall:

@Controller
@RequestMapping("/orders")
public class OrderController {
    @Autowired
    private NewBeeMallOrderService newBeeMallOrderService;
    // ...
}

The code snippets show similar controller structures, but litemall uses @RestController and focuses on WeChat-specific endpoints, while newbee-mall uses a more generic approach with @Controller.

litemall offers a more feature-rich and modern e-commerce solution with better documentation and community support. However, it may be more complex to set up and maintain compared to newbee-mall. newbee-mall might be a better choice for simpler projects or those new to e-commerce development, while litemall is suitable for more advanced, scalable applications.

Pros of zheng

• More comprehensive and feature-rich, offering a complete microservices architecture
• Includes a wider range of technologies and frameworks, providing a broader learning experience
• Has a larger community and more stars on GitHub, indicating higher popularity and potential support

Cons of zheng

• More complex and potentially overwhelming for beginners or smaller projects
• Last updated in 2018, which may indicate less active maintenance compared to newbee-mall
• Requires more resources and setup time due to its extensive architecture

Code Comparison

zheng (Java):

@Service
@Transactional
public class UserServiceImpl implements UserService {
    @Autowired
    private UserMapper userMapper;
    
    @Override
    public UserDto getUserById(Long userId) {
        return userMapper.selectByPrimaryKey(userId);
    }
}

newbee-mall (Java):

@Service
public class NewBeeMallUserServiceImpl implements NewBeeMallUserService {
    @Resource
    private MallUserMapper mallUserMapper;

    @Override
    public PageResult getNewBeeMallUsersPage(PageQueryUtil pageUtil) {
        List<MallUser> mallUsers = mallUserMapper.findMallUserList(pageUtil);
        int total = mallUserMapper.getTotalMallUsers(pageUtil);
        PageResult pageResult = new PageResult(mallUsers, total, pageUtil.getLimit(), pageUtil.getPage());
        return pageResult;
    }
}

The code snippets show that both projects use similar Spring annotations and follow typical service layer patterns. However, zheng's code appears more concise, while newbee-mall's code includes more detailed implementation for pagination.

Pros of yudao-cloud

• More comprehensive microservices architecture, suitable for large-scale applications
• Extensive documentation and active community support
• Incorporates advanced features like distributed transactions and service governance

Cons of yudao-cloud

• Higher complexity and steeper learning curve
• Potentially overengineered for smaller projects
• Requires more resources to deploy and maintain

Code Comparison

yudao-cloud:

@EnableFeignClients(basePackages = "cn.iocoder.yudao")
@SpringBootApplication(exclude = {DataSourceAutoConfiguration.class})
public class YudaoSystemServerApplication {
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        SpringApplication.run(YudaoSystemServerApplication.class, args);
    }
}

newbee-mall:

@SpringBootApplication
public class NewBeeMallApplication {
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        SpringApplication.run(NewBeeMallApplication.class, args);
    }
}

The yudao-cloud example shows a more complex configuration with microservices-specific annotations and exclusions, while newbee-mall has a simpler setup typical of monolithic applications.

Pros of paascloud-master

• More comprehensive microservices architecture, suitable for large-scale applications
• Includes advanced features like distributed transactions and service governance
• Offers a complete DevOps pipeline with CI/CD integration

Cons of paascloud-master

• Higher complexity and steeper learning curve
• Requires more resources to deploy and maintain
• May be overkill for smaller projects or startups

Code Comparison

paascloud-master (Spring Cloud):

@SpringBootApplication
@EnableDiscoveryClient
@EnableFeignClients
public class PaasCloudCoreApplication {
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        SpringApplication.run(PaasCloudCoreApplication.class, args);
    }
}

newbee-mall (Spring Boot):

@SpringBootApplication
public class NewbeeMallApplication {
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        SpringApplication.run(NewbeeMallApplication.class, args);
    }
}

The code comparison shows that paascloud-master uses Spring Cloud annotations for microservices, while newbee-mall uses a simpler Spring Boot setup. This reflects the difference in architecture complexity between the two projects.

paascloud-master is better suited for enterprise-level applications with complex microservices requirements, while newbee-mall is more appropriate for smaller e-commerce projects or those looking for a simpler implementation.