Pros of Magisk

• Provides root access and system modification without altering the system partition
• Offers a more comprehensive set of features, including modules and MagiskHide
• Generally more stable and widely supported across different devices

Cons of Magisk

• Requires unlocking the bootloader, which may void warranty on some devices
• Can be more complex to set up for users new to Android customization

Code Comparison

EdXposed:

public class XposedBridge {
    private static final String TAG = "EdXposed";
    // ...
}

Magisk:

object MagiskBoot {
    private const val CHROMEOS_MAGIC = "CHROMEOS"
    // ...
}

Key Differences

• EdXposed focuses on modifying app behavior through Xposed framework, while Magisk provides broader system-level modifications
• Magisk has a more active development cycle and larger community support
• EdXposed requires Magisk or similar root solution to function, whereas Magisk can operate independently

Use Cases

• EdXposed: Ideal for users who primarily want to modify app behavior without extensive system changes
• Magisk: Better suited for users seeking comprehensive root access, system modifications, and module support

Pros of Riru

• Lighter weight and more efficient than EdXposed
• Broader compatibility with various Android versions and devices
• More frequent updates and active development

Cons of Riru

• Less comprehensive module support compared to EdXposed
• Requires more technical knowledge for installation and usage
• May have limited functionality for certain advanced Xposed modules

Code Comparison

EdXposed:

public class EdXposedBridge {
    public static void hookMethod(Member method, XC_MethodHook callback) {
        // Implementation
    }
}

Riru:

static int riru_api_version = 0;
static RiruApiV9 *riru_api = NULL;

static void init(void *handle, int api_version, const RiruApiV9 *api) {
    riru_api_version = api_version;
    riru_api = api;
}

The code snippets show that EdXposed uses Java for its core functionality, while Riru utilizes C, indicating a lower-level approach. EdXposed focuses on method hooking, whereas Riru provides a more general-purpose API for system modifications.

Pros of LSPosed

• More active development and frequent updates
• Better compatibility with newer Android versions
• Improved stability and performance

Cons of LSPosed

• May have a steeper learning curve for new users
• Potentially less compatible with older Android versions

Code Comparison

LSPosed:

@Override
public void handleLoadPackage(XC_LoadPackage.LoadPackageParam lpparam) throws Throwable {
    if (lpparam.packageName.equals("com.example.app")) {
        XposedHelpers.findAndHookMethod("com.example.app.MainActivity", lpparam.classLoader,
                "onCreate", Bundle.class, new XC_MethodHook() {
            @Override
            protected void beforeHookedMethod(MethodHookParam param) throws Throwable {
                XposedBridge.log("App started!");
            }
        });
    }
}

EdXposed:

@Override
public void handleLoadPackage(XC_LoadPackage.LoadPackageParam lpparam) throws Throwable {
    if (lpparam.packageName.equals("com.example.app")) {
        XposedHelpers.findAndHookMethod("com.example.app.MainActivity", lpparam.classLoader,
                "onCreate", Bundle.class, new XC_MethodHook() {
            @Override
            protected void afterHookedMethod(MethodHookParam param) throws Throwable {
                XposedBridge.log("App started!");
            }
        });
    }
}

Both LSPosed and EdXposed use similar hooking mechanisms, but LSPosed often provides more advanced features and optimizations in its implementation.

Pros of XposedBridge

• More established and widely recognized in the Android modding community
• Extensive documentation and community support
• Broader compatibility with older Android versions

Cons of XposedBridge

• Development has slowed down in recent years
• May not fully support newer Android versions (10+)
• Requires custom recovery for installation

Code Comparison

XposedBridge:

public class XposedBridge {
    private static final String TAG = "XposedBridge";
    private static final Object[] EMPTY_ARRAY = new Object[0];
    private static final XposedBridge sInstance = new XposedBridge();
    // ...
}

EdXposed:

public class EdXposedBridge {
    public static final String TAG = "EdXposedBridge";
    private static final Object[] EMPTY_ARRAY = new Object[0];
    private static final EdXposedBridge sInstance = new EdXposedBridge();
    // ...
}

The code structure is similar, with EdXposed being based on XposedBridge. The main differences lie in the implementation details and how they interact with the Android system.

EdXposed aims to provide a more modern approach to the Xposed framework, focusing on newer Android versions and utilizing different hooking mechanisms. It offers improved compatibility with Android 10+ and doesn't require custom recovery for installation. However, it may have less extensive documentation and community support compared to the original XposedBridge.

Pros of XposedInstaller

• More established and widely recognized in the Android modding community
• Extensive documentation and user guides available
• Larger user base, potentially leading to more community support and modules

Cons of XposedInstaller

• No longer actively maintained, with the last update in 2017
• Limited compatibility with newer Android versions (Android 8.0 and above)
• Requires custom recovery and system modification, which may void device warranty

Code Comparison

XposedInstaller:

public class XposedApp extends Application {
    public static final String TAG = "XposedInstaller";
    private static XposedApp mInstance = null;
    private static Thread mUiThread;
    private static Handler mMainHandler;
}

EdXposed:

public class EdXposedApp extends Application {
    public static final String TAG = "EdXposedManager";
    private static EdXposedApp instance = null;
    private static SharedPreferences pref;
    private static ClassLoader classLoader;
}

Both projects use similar application class structures, but EdXposed includes additional features like SharedPreferences and ClassLoader management, reflecting its more recent development and focus on newer Android versions.