Pros of Xposed

• Established and widely recognized framework with a large user base
• Extensive documentation and community support
• Compatible with a broader range of Android versions

Cons of Xposed

• Requires device rooting, which can void warranties and compromise security
• Less frequent updates and slower development cycle
• May cause system instability on some devices

Code Comparison

Xposed:

public class MyModule implements IXposedHookLoadPackage {
    public void handleLoadPackage(LoadPackageParam lpparam) throws Throwable {
        XposedBridge.log("Loaded app: " + lpparam.packageName);
    }
}

LSPosed:

public class MyModule implements IXposedHookLoadPackage {
    public void handleLoadPackage(XC_LoadPackage.LoadPackageParam lpparam) throws Throwable {
        XposedBridge.log("Loaded app: " + lpparam.packageName);
    }
}

The code structure for both frameworks is similar, with minor differences in import statements and method signatures. LSPosed maintains compatibility with existing Xposed modules, allowing for easy migration between the two frameworks.

LSPosed offers improved performance, enhanced stability, and support for newer Android versions without requiring root access. It also provides more frequent updates and active development compared to Xposed.

Pros of Magisk

• More comprehensive system-level modifications, including root access
• Wider range of customization options and module support
• Actively maintained with frequent updates and strong community support

Cons of Magisk

• Requires unlocked bootloader and may void device warranty
• Higher risk of system instability if not used carefully
• More complex setup process compared to LSPosed

Code Comparison

Magisk (C++):

static int magisk_main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
    if (argc > 1 && strcmp(argv[1], "-c") == 0) {
        printf(MAGISK_VERSION ":MAGISK\n");
        return 0;
    }
    // ...
}

LSPosed (Java):

public class LSPosed {
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        if (args.length > 0 && args[0].equals("--version")) {
            System.out.println(BuildConfig.VERSION_NAME);
            return;
        }
        // ...
    }
}

Both projects handle version information differently, with Magisk using C++ and LSPosed using Java. Magisk's code appears more low-level, reflecting its system-wide approach, while LSPosed's code is higher-level, consistent with its focus on app modification.

Pros of Riru

• More lightweight and focused on providing a framework for modules
• Potentially better performance due to its minimalistic approach
• Wider compatibility with various Android versions and devices

Cons of Riru

• Requires more technical knowledge to implement modules
• Less user-friendly for those seeking ready-to-use modifications
• Smaller community and fewer pre-built modules available

Code Comparison

LSPosed:

public class LSPosed extends XposedHelper {
    @Override
    public void handleLoadPackage(XC_LoadPackage.LoadPackageParam lpparam) throws Throwable {
        // LSPosed-specific implementation
    }
}

Riru:

static void onModuleLoaded() {
    // Riru module initialization
    // More low-level C implementation
}

LSPosed is built on top of the Xposed framework, providing a higher-level Java API for module development. Riru, on the other hand, offers a lower-level C-based approach, allowing for more direct system modifications but requiring more expertise to implement.

Both projects aim to enhance Android functionality, but LSPosed focuses on providing a user-friendly Xposed framework alternative, while Riru serves as a lightweight foundation for various system modifications.

Pros of EdXposed

• Longer history and established user base
• More extensive documentation and community resources
• Supports a wider range of Android versions (including older ones)

Cons of EdXposed

• Less frequent updates and slower development cycle
• Higher resource consumption and potential impact on system performance
• More complex installation process, especially for newer Android versions

Code Comparison

EdXposed:

public class EdXposedBridge {
    public static void hookMethod(Member method, XC_MethodHook callback) {
        if (method == null) {
            throw new IllegalArgumentException("method must not be null");
        }
        // ... (implementation details)
    }
}

LSPosed:

public final class LSPosed {
    public static void hookMethod(@NonNull Member hookMethod, @NonNull XC_MethodHook callback) {
        if (hookMethod == null) throw new IllegalArgumentException("hookMethod cannot be null");
        if (callback == null) throw new IllegalArgumentException("callback cannot be null");
        // ... (implementation details)
    }
}

Both projects aim to provide Xposed framework functionality, but LSPosed is generally considered more modern and efficient. It offers better performance, more frequent updates, and improved compatibility with newer Android versions. However, EdXposed may still be preferred by some users due to its broader device support and established community resources.