Pros of flatpickr

• Lightweight and fast, with a smaller file size
• More extensive browser support, including older versions
• Highly customizable with a wide range of options and plugins

Cons of flatpickr

• Less comprehensive date and time handling compared to Tempus Dominus
• Fewer built-in features for complex date/time scenarios
• Limited support for localization and internationalization out of the box

Code Comparison

flatpickr:

flatpickr("#myDatePicker", {
  enableTime: true,
  dateFormat: "Y-m-d H:i",
});

Tempus Dominus:

new tempusDominus.TempusDominus(document.getElementById('myDatePicker'), {
  display: {
    components: {
      clock: true,
    },
    format: 'yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm'
  }
});

Both libraries offer easy-to-use initialization, but Tempus Dominus provides more granular control over display components. flatpickr's syntax is more concise, while Tempus Dominus offers a more object-oriented approach with nested options.

Pros of daterangepicker

• Lightweight and focused on date range selection
• Easy to integrate with Bootstrap and jQuery
• Extensive documentation and examples

Cons of daterangepicker

• Limited to date and time selection functionality
• Requires jQuery dependency
• Less frequent updates and maintenance

Code Comparison

daterangepicker:

$('input[name="daterange"]').daterangepicker({
    opens: 'left',
    startDate: moment().startOf('hour'),
    endDate: moment().startOf('hour').add(32, 'hour')
});

tempus-dominus:

const picker = new tempusDominus.TempusDominus(document.getElementById('datetimepicker'), {
    display: {
        sideBySide: true,
        components: {
            calendar: true,
            date: true,
            month: true,
            year: true,
            decades: true,
            clock: true,
            hours: true,
            minutes: true,
            seconds: true
        }
    }
});

Summary

daterangepicker is a lightweight solution for date range selection, ideal for projects using Bootstrap and jQuery. It's easy to implement but has limited functionality beyond date ranges. tempus-dominus offers a more comprehensive datetime picker with additional features and customization options, but may be overkill for simple date range selection needs. The choice between the two depends on the specific requirements of your project and the desired level of functionality.

Pros of Pikaday

• Lightweight and minimalistic, with a smaller file size
• No external dependencies, making it easier to integrate
• Simple API and straightforward configuration options

Cons of Pikaday

• Limited feature set compared to Tempus Dominus
• Less customization options for advanced use cases
• Lacks built-in support for time selection and range picking

Code Comparison

Pikaday:

var picker = new Pikaday({
    field: document.getElementById('datepicker'),
    format: 'D MMM YYYY',
    onSelect: function(date) {
        console.log(date);
    }
});

Tempus Dominus:

new tempusDominus.TempusDominus(document.getElementById('datetimepicker'), {
    display: {
        components: {
            clock: true,
            date: true,
            month: true,
            year: true,
        },
        format: 'DD MMM YYYY HH:mm'
    },
    hooks: {
        inputFormat: (context, date) => moment(date).format('DD MMM YYYY HH:mm')
    }
});

Pros of datetimepicker

• Lightweight and simple to use
• Supports a wide range of date and time formats
• Extensive customization options for appearance and behavior

Cons of datetimepicker

• Less active development and maintenance
• Limited modern browser features and accessibility support
• Fewer built-in localization options

Code Comparison

datetimepicker:

$('#datetimepicker').datetimepicker({
  format: 'Y-m-d H:i',
  inline: true,
  lang: 'en'
});

tempus-dominus:

new tempusDominus.TempusDominus(document.getElementById('datetimepicker'), {
  display: {
    inline: true,
    components: {
      date: true,
      month: true,
      year: true,
      clock: true
    }
  },
  localization: {
    format: 'yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm'
  }
});

Both libraries offer datetime picking functionality, but tempus-dominus provides a more modern approach with better TypeScript support, accessibility features, and active development. datetimepicker is simpler to set up and use, making it suitable for smaller projects or those with basic requirements. tempus-dominus offers more robust features and customization options, making it a better choice for larger, more complex applications that require advanced functionality and ongoing support.

Pros of Datepicker

• Lightweight and simple, with a smaller file size
• Easy to use and integrate, with minimal setup required
• Supports a wide range of browsers, including older versions

Cons of Datepicker

• Limited features compared to Tempus Dominus
• Lacks advanced time selection options
• No built-in localization support

Code Comparison

Datepicker initialization:

$('.datepicker').datepicker({
  format: 'yyyy-mm-dd',
  autoclose: true
});

Tempus Dominus initialization:

new tempusDominus.TempusDominus(document.getElementById('datetimepicker'), {
  display: {
    components: {
      clock: false
    }
  }
});

Both libraries offer straightforward initialization, but Tempus Dominus provides more configuration options out of the box. Datepicker focuses on simplicity, while Tempus Dominus offers greater flexibility and features.

Datepicker is ideal for projects requiring basic date selection functionality with minimal overhead. Tempus Dominus is better suited for applications needing advanced date and time picking capabilities, localization support, and extensive customization options.