flatpickr

Pros of Pikaday

• Lightweight and minimalistic, with a smaller file size
• No dependencies, making it easier to integrate into projects
• Simple API and straightforward configuration options

Cons of Pikaday

• Less feature-rich compared to Flatpickr
• Limited built-in themes and styling options
• Less frequent updates and maintenance

Code Comparison

Pikaday:

var picker = new Pikaday({
    field: document.getElementById('datepicker'),
    format: 'D MMM YYYY',
    onSelect: function(date) {
        console.log(date);
    }
});

Flatpickr:

flatpickr("#datepicker", {
    dateFormat: "d M Y",
    onChange: function(selectedDates, dateStr, instance) {
        console.log(selectedDates[0]);
    }
});

Both libraries offer similar basic functionality for date picking, but Flatpickr provides more advanced features and customization options out of the box. Pikaday's simplicity may be preferred for projects requiring a lightweight solution, while Flatpickr's extensive feature set and active development make it suitable for more complex applications.

Pros of Tempus Dominus

• More comprehensive date and time selection options, including seconds and milliseconds
• Better support for localization and internationalization
• Extensive event system for custom behaviors and integrations

Cons of Tempus Dominus

• Larger file size and potentially heavier performance impact
• Steeper learning curve due to more complex API and configuration options
• Less frequent updates and maintenance compared to Flatpickr

Code Comparison

Flatpickr initialization:

flatpickr("#myDatePicker", {
  enableTime: true,
  dateFormat: "Y-m-d H:i",
});

Tempus Dominus initialization:

new tempusDominus.TempusDominus(document.getElementById('myDatePicker'), {
  display: {
    components: {
      seconds: true,
      useTwentyfourHour: true
    },
    format: 'yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss'
  }
});

Both libraries offer powerful date and time picking functionality, but Tempus Dominus provides more advanced features at the cost of complexity. Flatpickr is lighter and easier to use, making it suitable for simpler use cases, while Tempus Dominus excels in scenarios requiring more detailed control and customization.

Pros of Daterangepicker

• Built-in support for selecting date ranges, which is its primary focus
• Offers pre-defined date ranges (e.g., "Last 7 Days", "This Month")
• Integrates well with Bootstrap for consistent styling

Cons of Daterangepicker

• Larger file size and more dependencies (jQuery and Moment.js required)
• Less customizable in terms of appearance and functionality
• Not as actively maintained as Flatpickr

Code Comparison

Daterangepicker:

$('input[name="daterange"]').daterangepicker({
    startDate: moment().subtract(7, 'days'),
    endDate: moment(),
    locale: {
        format: 'YYYY-MM-DD'
    }
});

Flatpickr:

flatpickr("#date-range", {
    mode: "range",
    dateFormat: "Y-m-d",
    defaultDate: [new Date().fp_incr(-7), new Date()]
});

Both libraries offer date range selection, but Flatpickr provides a more lightweight and flexible solution. Daterangepicker excels in pre-defined ranges and Bootstrap integration, while Flatpickr offers broader browser support and more customization options. The choice between them depends on specific project requirements and preferences.

Pros of datetimepicker

• More extensive customization options for appearance and behavior
• Supports a wider range of date and time formats
• Includes additional features like inline mode and custom cell rendering

Cons of datetimepicker

• Larger file size and potentially heavier performance impact
• Less frequent updates and maintenance compared to flatpickr
• More complex configuration and setup process

Code Comparison

datetimepicker:

$('#datetimepicker').datetimepicker({
  format: 'Y-m-d H:i',
  inline: true,
  lang: 'en'
});

flatpickr:

flatpickr("#flatpickr", {
  enableTime: true,
  dateFormat: "Y-m-d H:i",
  inline: true
});

Summary

datetimepicker offers more extensive customization and features, making it suitable for complex date and time selection requirements. However, it comes at the cost of a larger file size and potentially more complex setup. flatpickr, on the other hand, provides a lighter-weight solution with a simpler API, making it easier to implement for basic date and time picking needs. The choice between the two depends on the specific requirements of your project, balancing between feature richness and simplicity.

Pros of date-picker

• Built with web components, offering better encapsulation and reusability
• Designed with accessibility in mind, following WCAG 2.1 guidelines
• Lightweight and framework-agnostic, easily integrable into various projects

Cons of date-picker

• Less customizable compared to flatpickr's extensive options
• Smaller community and fewer third-party extensions
• Limited to date picking functionality, while flatpickr offers more features

Code Comparison

date-picker:

<duet-date-picker identifier="date" name="date"></duet-date-picker>

flatpickr:

<input type="text" class="flatpickr" data-date-format="Y-m-d" />
<script>
  flatpickr(".flatpickr", {});
</script>

Summary

date-picker focuses on simplicity, accessibility, and framework independence using web components. It's ideal for projects prioritizing these aspects. flatpickr offers more customization options and features, making it suitable for complex date-time picking requirements. The choice between them depends on specific project needs and preferences.