Pros of ACL4SSR

• More comprehensive rule set with a wider range of categories
• Regularly updated with frequent commits
• Includes additional tools and scripts for rule management

Cons of ACL4SSR

• Larger file size due to extensive rule set
• May require more configuration for specific use cases
• Potentially overwhelming for beginners due to its complexity

Code Comparison

Rules:

# GeQ1an/Rules
DOMAIN-SUFFIX,example.com,DIRECT
DOMAIN-KEYWORD,google,Proxy
IP-CIDR,192.168.0.0/16,DIRECT

ACL4SSR:

# ACL4SSR
DOMAIN-SUFFIX,example.com,DIRECT
DOMAIN-KEYWORD,google,Proxy
IP-CIDR,192.168.0.0/16,DIRECT
GEOIP,CN,DIRECT
URL-REGEX,^https?://example\.com/resource/,Proxy

The code comparison shows that ACL4SSR includes additional rule types like GEOIP and URL-REGEX, offering more granular control over network traffic. However, the basic structure and syntax of both rule sets are similar, making it easier for users to transition between the two if needed.

Pros of ios_rule_script

• More comprehensive rule sets covering a wider range of applications and services
• Frequent updates and active maintenance
• Includes additional scripts and tools for iOS automation

Cons of ios_rule_script

• Larger repository size, potentially leading to longer download times
• More complex structure, which may be overwhelming for beginners
• Some rules may be overly specific or redundant for casual users

Code Comparison

ios_rule_script:

# Netflix
USER-AGENT,Argo*
DOMAIN-SUFFIX,netflix.com
DOMAIN-SUFFIX,netflix.net
DOMAIN-SUFFIX,nflxext.com
DOMAIN-SUFFIX,nflximg.com

Rules:

# Netflix
USER-AGENT,Argo*
DOMAIN-SUFFIX,netflix.com
DOMAIN-SUFFIX,netflix.net
DOMAIN-SUFFIX,nflxso.net
DOMAIN-SUFFIX,nflxvideo.net

Both repositories provide rule sets for popular streaming services like Netflix. The code snippets show similar structure and content, with minor differences in the specific domains included. ios_rule_script tends to have more extensive lists for each service, while Rules focuses on core domains.

Overall, ios_rule_script offers a more comprehensive and actively maintained collection of rules and scripts, but may be overkill for users seeking a simpler setup. Rules provides a more streamlined approach, which could be preferable for those who want a basic configuration without extra complexity.

Pros of clash-rules

• More comprehensive rule sets, including categories like "private", "applications", and "custom"
• Regular updates and active maintenance, with frequent commits
• Extensive documentation and usage instructions in multiple languages

Cons of clash-rules

• Larger file sizes due to more extensive rule sets
• May require more configuration and customization for specific use cases
• Potentially higher resource usage when implemented in Clash

Code Comparison

clash-rules:

payload:
  - DOMAIN-SUFFIX,google.com
  - DOMAIN-SUFFIX,googlevideo.com
  - DOMAIN-SUFFIX,youtube.com
  - DOMAIN-SUFFIX,ytimg.com
  - DOMAIN-KEYWORD,gmail

Rules:

DOMAIN-SUFFIX,google.com
DOMAIN-SUFFIX,googlevideo.com
DOMAIN-SUFFIX,youtube.com
DOMAIN-SUFFIX,ytimg.com
DOMAIN-KEYWORD,gmail

The main difference in code structure is that clash-rules uses a YAML format with a "payload" key, while Rules uses a simpler list format. Both repositories provide similar rule content, but clash-rules offers a more structured approach that may be easier to integrate with certain tools or configurations.

Pros of SS-Rule-Snippet

• More frequent updates and active maintenance
• Broader range of supported platforms and applications
• More detailed documentation and usage instructions

Cons of SS-Rule-Snippet

• Larger file size and potentially more complex rule structure
• May include unnecessary rules for some users' specific needs
• Slightly steeper learning curve for beginners

Code Comparison

SS-Rule-Snippet:

# Apple
DOMAIN-SUFFIX,aaplimg.com,Apple
DOMAIN-SUFFIX,apple.co,Apple
DOMAIN-SUFFIX,apple.com,Apple
DOMAIN-SUFFIX,apple-cloudkit.com,Apple
DOMAIN-SUFFIX,appstore.com,Apple

Rules:

# Apple
DOMAIN-SUFFIX,apple.com,Apple
DOMAIN-SUFFIX,icloud.com,Apple
DOMAIN-SUFFIX,itunes.com,Apple
DOMAIN-SUFFIX,me.com,Apple
DOMAIN-SUFFIX,mzstatic.com,Apple

Both repositories provide rule sets for network traffic management, but SS-Rule-Snippet offers more comprehensive coverage and frequent updates. Rules, on the other hand, may be more straightforward for users with simpler needs. The code comparison shows that both repositories use similar syntax for defining rules, but SS-Rule-Snippet tends to include more specific domains and subdomains in its ruleset.