Pros of laravel-translatable

• Allows for dynamic content translation within database models
• Supports multiple languages for each translatable field
• Provides a flexible and scalable solution for multilingual applications

Cons of laravel-translatable

• Requires additional database setup and model configuration
• May introduce complexity for simple translation needs
• Performance impact due to additional database queries for translations

Code Comparison

laravel-translatable:

use Astrotomic\Translatable\Translatable;

class Product extends Model
{
    use Translatable;

    public $translatedAttributes = ['name', 'description'];
}

lang:

// resources/lang/en/products.php
return [
    'name' => 'Product Name',
    'description' => 'Product Description',
];

Summary

laravel-translatable is ideal for complex, database-driven multilingual applications, offering dynamic content translation within models. However, it requires more setup and may impact performance. lang provides a simpler, file-based approach for static translations, which is easier to implement but less flexible for dynamic content. Choose based on your project's specific needs and complexity.

Pros of laravel-localization

• Provides route localization and URL generation for multi-language applications
• Offers middleware for automatic language detection and switching
• Includes helper functions for language-related operations

Cons of laravel-localization

• Focuses on routing and URL management rather than translation management
• Requires manual creation and management of language files
• May have a steeper learning curve for beginners

Code Comparison

laravel-localization:

Route::group(['prefix' => LaravelLocalization::setLocale()], function() {
    Route::get('/', 'HomeController@index');
});

lang:

// No equivalent routing functionality
// Translation usage:
__('messages.welcome');

Key Differences

lang is primarily a collection of pre-translated language files for Laravel applications, while laravel-localization is a package that provides routing and URL management tools for multi-language applications. lang offers a vast array of ready-to-use translations across numerous languages, making it easier to implement basic localization. On the other hand, laravel-localization gives developers more control over language switching and URL structure in multi-language applications but requires more setup and configuration.

Choose lang if you need quick access to pre-translated strings for multiple languages. Opt for laravel-localization if you require advanced routing and URL management for a multi-language application with custom language switching logic.

Pros of laravel-translation-manager

• Provides a user-friendly interface for managing translations
• Allows real-time editing and importing of language files
• Supports automatic translation using Google Translate API

Cons of laravel-translation-manager

• Requires additional setup and configuration
• May introduce complexity for smaller projects
• Less frequently updated compared to lang

Code Comparison

lang:

return [
    'accepted' => 'The :attribute must be accepted.',
    'active_url' => 'The :attribute is not a valid URL.',
    'after' => 'The :attribute must be a date after :date.',
    // ...
];

laravel-translation-manager:

use Barryvdh\TranslationManager\Manager;

$manager = app(Manager::class);
$manager->importTranslations();
$translations = $manager->getTranslations();

lang focuses on providing pre-translated language files for Laravel applications, while laravel-translation-manager offers a more dynamic approach to managing translations. lang is easier to integrate and use out of the box, especially for projects that don't require frequent translation updates. laravel-translation-manager, on the other hand, provides more flexibility and control over the translation process, making it suitable for projects with complex localization needs or frequent updates to translations.

Pros of lang

• More comprehensive language support with 85+ languages
• Active community contributions and frequent updates
• Includes validation messages and other Laravel-specific translations

Cons of lang

• Larger repository size due to extensive language files
• May include unnecessary languages for some projects
• Potentially slower to load all translations in memory

Code Comparison

lang:

return [
    'accepted' => 'The :attribute must be accepted.',
    'active_url' => 'The :attribute is not a valid URL.',
    'after' => 'The :attribute must be a date after :date.',
    // ... more translations
];

lang:

return [
    'accepted' => 'The :attribute must be accepted.',
    'active_url' => 'The :attribute is not a valid URL.',
    'after' => 'The :attribute must be a date after :date.',
    // ... more translations
];

Summary

Both repositories provide language translations for Laravel applications. lang offers a wider range of languages and more frequent updates, making it suitable for projects requiring extensive language support. However, this comes at the cost of a larger repository size and potentially slower loading times. The code structure is similar in both repositories, with lang potentially offering more comprehensive translations for Laravel-specific features.