Pros of Context-Menu.Android

• Simpler implementation for basic circular context menus
• Smoother animations and transitions
• Easier to customize menu item appearance

Cons of Context-Menu.Android

• Limited menu item options compared to BoomMenu
• Less flexible in terms of menu layout and positioning
• Fewer animation styles and effects available

Code Comparison

Context-Menu.Android:

MenuAdapter<String> menuAdapter = new MenuAdapter<>(this, actionsText);
MenuParams menuParams = new MenuParams();
menuParams.setActionBarSize((int) getResources().getDimension(R.dimen.tool_bar_height));
menuParams.setMenuObjects(getMenuObjects());
menuParams.setClosableOutside(false);
mMenuDialogFragment = ContextMenuDialogFragment.newInstance(menuParams);

BoomMenu:

BoomMenuButton bmb = (BoomMenuButton) findViewById(R.id.bmb);
bmb.addBuilder(new HamButton.Builder()
        .normalImageRes(R.drawable.icon)
        .normalText("Text")
        .listener(new OnBMClickListener() {
            @Override
            public void onBoomButtonClick(int index) {
                // Handle click
            }
        }));

Both libraries offer circular menu implementations for Android, but BoomMenu provides more extensive customization options and menu styles. Context-Menu.Android focuses on simplicity and smooth animations, making it easier to implement basic circular menus. BoomMenu offers greater flexibility in menu layout, positioning, and animation effects, but may require more complex setup. Choose based on your specific requirements and desired level of customization.

Pros of FloatingActionButton

• Simpler implementation for basic floating action button functionality
• Lightweight and focused on core FAB features
• Easier to integrate into existing projects with minimal customization

Cons of FloatingActionButton

• Limited animation options compared to BoomMenu's extensive animations
• Fewer customization options for button appearance and behavior
• Lacks the ability to create complex menu structures with multiple buttons

Code Comparison

BoomMenu:

BoomMenuButton bmb = (BoomMenuButton) findViewById(R.id.bmb);
bmb.addBuilder(new HamButton.Builder()
    .normalImageRes(R.drawable.icon)
    .normalText("Text")
    .listener(new OnBMClickListener() {
        @Override
        public void onBoomButtonClick(int index) {
            // Handle click
        }
    }));

FloatingActionButton:

FloatingActionButton fab = (FloatingActionButton) findViewById(R.id.fab);
fab.setOnClickListener(new View.OnClickListener() {
    @Override
    public void onClick(View view) {
        // Handle click
    }
});

The code comparison shows that BoomMenu requires more setup for creating complex menu structures, while FloatingActionButton offers a simpler implementation for basic FAB functionality. BoomMenu provides more customization options and animation capabilities, whereas FloatingActionButton focuses on core FAB features with less complexity.

Pros of TapBarMenu

• Simpler and more lightweight implementation
• Easier to customize and integrate into existing projects
• Smoother animations and transitions

Cons of TapBarMenu

• Limited menu item options compared to BoomMenu
• Less flexibility in terms of button layouts and designs
• Fewer customization options for individual menu items

Code Comparison

TapBarMenu:

tapBarMenu.setOnClickListener {
    tapBarMenu.toggle()
}

BoomMenu:

BoomMenuButton bmb = findViewById(R.id.bmb);
bmb.addBuilder(new HamButton.Builder()
    .normalImageRes(R.drawable.icon)
    .normalText("Text"));

Summary

TapBarMenu offers a simpler, more lightweight solution for creating animated menu buttons in Android applications. It provides smooth animations and is easier to integrate into existing projects. However, it lacks the extensive customization options and flexibility offered by BoomMenu.

BoomMenu, on the other hand, provides a wide range of button types, layouts, and customization options. It allows for more complex menu designs but may require more setup and configuration.

The choice between the two libraries depends on the specific requirements of your project. If you need a simple, animated menu button with basic functionality, TapBarMenu might be the better choice. For more complex menu designs with multiple button types and extensive customization, BoomMenu would be more suitable.

Pros of AndroidResideMenu

• Simpler implementation for a slide-out menu
• Lightweight and focused on a single menu style
• Easier to customize for basic slide-out menu needs

Cons of AndroidResideMenu

• Limited animation options compared to BoomMenu
• Less flexibility in menu item layout and design
• Fewer customization options for advanced use cases

Code Comparison

AndroidResideMenu:

ResideMenu resideMenu = new ResideMenu(this);
resideMenu.setBackground(R.drawable.menu_background);
resideMenu.attachToActivity(this);
resideMenu.addMenuItem(menuItem, ResideMenu.DIRECTION_LEFT);

BoomMenu:

BoomMenuButton bmb = (BoomMenuButton) findViewById(R.id.bmb);
bmb.addBuilder(new HamButton.Builder()
        .normalImageRes(R.drawable.icon)
        .normalText("Text")
        .listener(new OnBMClickListener() {
            @Override
            public void onBoomButtonClick(int index) {
                // Handle click
            }
        }));

AndroidResideMenu offers a straightforward approach for implementing a slide-out menu, making it easier to set up for basic use cases. However, BoomMenu provides more advanced animation options and greater flexibility in menu item design. BoomMenu's code is more verbose but allows for more detailed customization of individual menu items, including their appearance and behavior.