Pros of FloatingActionButton

• Simpler implementation for basic floating action button functionality
• More customization options for button appearance (shadow, colors, etc.)
• Better support for older Android versions

Cons of FloatingActionButton

• Limited to a single button, lacks the circular menu functionality
• Less visually appealing animations compared to circle-menu-android

Code Comparison

circle-menu-android:

val circleMenu = CircleMenuView(this)
circleMenu.setEventListener(object : CircleMenuView.EventListener() {
    override fun onMenuOpenAnimationStart(view: CircleMenuView) {
        Log.d("CircleMenuView", "onMenuOpenAnimationStart")
    }
})

FloatingActionButton:

FloatingActionButton fab = new FloatingActionButton(this);
fab.setOnClickListener(new View.OnClickListener() {
    @Override
    public void onClick(View view) {
        // Handle click event
    }
});

The code comparison shows that circle-menu-android requires more setup for its advanced functionality, while FloatingActionButton offers a simpler implementation for basic button functionality. circle-menu-android provides more complex animations and menu options, whereas FloatingActionButton focuses on a single, customizable button with straightforward click handling.

Pros of android-floating-action-button

• Simpler implementation focused on a single floating action button
• Easier to integrate into existing projects due to its lightweight nature
• More customization options for the button appearance and behavior

Cons of android-floating-action-button

• Limited to a single button, lacking the circular menu functionality
• Less visually appealing compared to the animated circle menu
• Fewer built-in animation options for button interactions

Code Comparison

circle-menu-android:

val circleMenu = CircleMenuView(this)
circleMenu.setEventListener(object : CircleMenuView.EventListener() {
    override fun onMenuOpenAnimationStart(view: CircleMenuView) {
        // Handle menu open animation start
    }
})

android-floating-action-button:

FloatingActionButton fab = new FloatingActionButton(this);
fab.setIcon(R.drawable.ic_action_add);
fab.setOnClickListener(new View.OnClickListener() {
    @Override
    public void onClick(View v) {
        // Handle button click
    }
});

The code comparison shows that circle-menu-android offers more complex functionality with its circular menu and animation events, while android-floating-action-button provides a simpler implementation focused on a single button with basic click handling.

Pros of CircularFloatingActionMenu

• More customizable with options for button size, colors, and animations
• Supports both image and text for menu items
• Allows for dynamic addition/removal of menu items

Cons of CircularFloatingActionMenu

• Less modern design compared to circle-menu-android
• Not actively maintained (last update was several years ago)
• Limited documentation and examples

Code Comparison

CircularFloatingActionMenu:

SubActionButton.Builder itemBuilder = new SubActionButton.Builder(this);
ImageView itemIcon = new ImageView(this);
itemIcon.setImageDrawable(getResources().getDrawable(R.drawable.ic_action_chat));
SubActionButton button1 = itemBuilder.setContentView(itemIcon).build();

FloatingActionMenu actionMenu = new FloatingActionMenu.Builder(this)
    .addSubActionView(button1)
    .attachTo(actionButton)
    .build();

circle-menu-android:

CircleMenuView circleMenuView = findViewById(R.id.circle_menu);
circleMenuView.setEventListener(new CircleMenuView.EventListener() {
    @Override
    public void onMenuOpenAnimationStart(@NonNull CircleMenuView view) {
        Log.d("D", "onMenuOpenAnimationStart");
    }
});

Both libraries offer easy-to-use APIs for creating circular menus, but CircularFloatingActionMenu provides more granular control over individual menu items, while circle-menu-android focuses on a more streamlined, modern approach with built-in animations and event listeners.

Pros of FloatingActionButtonSpeedDial

• More customizable with options for label positioning, orientation, and animation styles
• Better integration with Material Design guidelines and components
• Supports both vector drawables and icon fonts for menu items

Cons of FloatingActionButtonSpeedDial

• Less visually striking compared to the circular layout of circle-menu-android
• May require more setup code to achieve complex layouts
• Limited to a semi-circular or linear layout, unlike the full circular menu of circle-menu-android

Code Comparison

FloatingActionButtonSpeedDial:

<com.leinardi.android.speeddial.SpeedDialView
    android:id="@+id/speedDial"
    android:layout_width="wrap_content"
    android:layout_height="wrap_content"
    app:sdMainFabClosedSrc="@drawable/ic_add" />

circle-menu-android:

<com.ramotion.circlemenu.CircleMenuView
    android:id="@+id/circle_menu"
    android:layout_width="wrap_content"
    android:layout_height="wrap_content"
    app:button_colors="@array/colors"
    app:button_icons="@array/icons" />

Both libraries offer easy-to-use XML implementations, but FloatingActionButtonSpeedDial provides more flexibility in terms of customization through XML attributes. circle-menu-android focuses on a simpler, more visually appealing circular layout with predefined colors and icons.

FloatingActionButtonSpeedDial is better suited for applications requiring a traditional speed dial menu with Material Design integration, while circle-menu-android excels in creating visually striking circular menus with a unique animation style.

Pros of faboptions

• Simpler implementation with a more straightforward API
• Easier to integrate into existing layouts
• Supports both text and icon options

Cons of faboptions

• Less visually striking compared to the circular animation of circle-menu-android
• Limited customization options for appearance and animations
• Fewer stars and less active development

Code Comparison

faboptions:

<com.joaquimley.faboptions.FabOptions
    android:id="@+id/fab_options"
    android:layout_width="wrap_content"
    android:layout_height="wrap_content"
    app:button_menu="@menu/menu_fab_options" />

circle-menu-android:

<com.ramotion.circlemenu.CircleMenuView
    android:id="@+id/circle_menu"
    android:layout_width="wrap_content"
    android:layout_height="wrap_content"
    app:button_colors="@array/colors"
    app:button_icons="@array/icons" />

Both libraries offer easy-to-use XML implementations, but circle-menu-android requires separate arrays for colors and icons, while faboptions uses a standard menu resource.