electron-vue

Pros of Electron Forge

• More actively maintained with frequent updates
• Broader ecosystem support and integration with other tools
• Extensive documentation and community resources

Cons of Electron Forge

• Steeper learning curve for beginners
• Less opinionated structure, requiring more setup decisions

Code Comparison

electron-vue:

import Vue from 'vue'
import App from './App'

new Vue({
  components: { App },
  template: '<App/>'
}).$mount('#app')

Electron Forge:

import React from 'react';
import ReactDOM from 'react-dom';
import App from './App';

ReactDOM.render(<App />, document.getElementById('root'));

Key Differences

• electron-vue is specifically tailored for Vue.js, while Electron Forge is framework-agnostic
• Electron Forge offers more flexibility in project structure and build configurations
• electron-vue provides a more opinionated setup, which can be beneficial for quick starts

Use Cases

• Choose electron-vue for rapid Vue.js-based Electron app development
• Opt for Electron Forge when you need more control over the build process or want to use other frameworks

Community and Support

• Electron Forge has a larger community and more third-party resources
• electron-vue has a dedicated but smaller user base focused on Vue.js integration

Pros of electron-react-boilerplate

• More active development and frequent updates
• Extensive documentation and well-maintained wiki
• Larger community and more contributors

Cons of electron-react-boilerplate

• Steeper learning curve for beginners
• More complex project structure
• Heavier initial setup with more dependencies

Code Comparison

electron-react-boilerplate:

import { MemoryRouter as Router, Routes, Route } from 'react-router-dom';
import './App.css';

export default function App() {
  return (
    <Router>
      <Routes>
        <Route path="/" element={<Hello />} />
      </Routes>
    </Router>
  );
}

electron-vue:

<template>
  <div id="app">
    <router-view></router-view>
  </div>
</template>

<script>
export default {
  name: 'app'
}
</script>

The code comparison shows that electron-react-boilerplate uses React Router for navigation, while electron-vue uses Vue Router. The React version has a more explicit routing setup, while the Vue version is more concise.

electron-react-boilerplate offers a more robust and actively maintained solution with better documentation and community support. However, it may be more complex for beginners and requires a deeper understanding of React ecosystem. electron-vue provides a simpler structure and may be easier for Vue developers to adopt, but it has less frequent updates and a smaller community.

Pros of vue-cli-plugin-electron-builder

• Seamless integration with Vue CLI, allowing easy setup and configuration
• Regular updates and active maintenance, ensuring compatibility with latest Vue and Electron versions
• Built-in TypeScript support and modern JavaScript features

Cons of vue-cli-plugin-electron-builder

• Less opinionated structure compared to electron-vue's boilerplate
• May require more initial setup for complex Electron features
• Steeper learning curve for developers new to Vue CLI ecosystem

Code Comparison

electron-vue:

import Vue from 'vue'
import App from './App'

new Vue({
  components: { App },
  render: h => h(App)
}).$mount('#app')

vue-cli-plugin-electron-builder:

import Vue from 'vue'
import App from './App.vue'

Vue.config.productionTip = false

new Vue({
  render: h => h(App),
}).$mount('#app')

The code structures are similar, with vue-cli-plugin-electron-builder using a more modern Vue setup. Both approaches allow for easy integration of Electron features, but vue-cli-plugin-electron-builder benefits from Vue CLI's ecosystem and tooling.

Overall, vue-cli-plugin-electron-builder offers a more flexible and up-to-date solution for building Electron apps with Vue, while electron-vue provides a more structured boilerplate that may be easier for beginners to get started with.

Pros of electron-quick-start

• Simpler setup, ideal for beginners or small projects
• Minimal boilerplate code, allowing for quick prototyping
• Official Electron project, ensuring compatibility and up-to-date practices

Cons of electron-quick-start

• Lacks built-in Vue.js integration, requiring manual setup for Vue projects
• No pre-configured build system or development tools
• Limited project structure, potentially challenging for larger applications

Code Comparison

electron-quick-start:

const { app, BrowserWindow } = require('electron')

function createWindow () {
  const win = new BrowserWindow({ width: 800, height: 600 })
  win.loadFile('index.html')
}

app.whenReady().then(createWindow)

electron-vue:

import Vue from 'vue'
import App from './App'

new Vue({
  components: { App },
  template: '<App/>'
}).$mount('#app')

// In main process
import { app, BrowserWindow } from 'electron'

Summary

electron-quick-start provides a minimal Electron setup, suitable for simple projects or learning purposes. It offers flexibility but requires more manual configuration for complex applications.

electron-vue integrates Vue.js with Electron, providing a more structured approach for building larger applications. It includes additional development tools and a pre-configured build system, making it more suitable for Vue.js developers working on substantial Electron projects.

Pros of electron-vite-vue

• Uses Vite, offering faster build times and improved development experience
• More recent and actively maintained, with better support for modern Vue 3 features
• Includes TypeScript support out of the box

Cons of electron-vite-vue

• Less mature ecosystem compared to electron-vue
• May require more manual configuration for complex projects
• Smaller community and fewer resources available online

Code Comparison

electron-vue (webpack-based):

import Vue from 'vue'
import App from './App'

new Vue({
  components: { App },
  render: h => h(App)
}).$mount('#app')

electron-vite-vue:

import { createApp } from 'vue'
import App from './App.vue'

createApp(App).mount('#app')

The code comparison shows the difference in initializing a Vue application. electron-vite-vue uses the more modern Vue 3 composition API, while electron-vue uses the older Vue 2 options API.

Both projects aim to simplify Electron and Vue integration, but electron-vite-vue leverages newer technologies and practices. The choice between them depends on project requirements, familiarity with tools, and desired features.

Pros of vite-electron-builder

• Uses Vite for faster build times and improved development experience
• More recent and actively maintained project
• Includes TypeScript support out of the box

Cons of vite-electron-builder

• Less mature and potentially less stable than electron-vue
• Smaller community and fewer resources available
• May require more configuration for complex projects

Code Comparison

electron-vue:

import Vue from 'vue'
import Router from 'vue-router'

Vue.use(Router)

export default new Router({
  routes: [
    // ...
  ]
})

vite-electron-builder:

import { createRouter, createWebHashHistory } from 'vue-router'

export default createRouter({
  history: createWebHashHistory(),
  routes: [
    // ...
  ]
})

The code comparison shows the difference in router setup between the two projects. vite-electron-builder uses the newer Vue Router 4 syntax with TypeScript, while electron-vue uses the older Vue Router 3 syntax with JavaScript.

vite-electron-builder leverages modern tooling and practices, offering potentially faster development and build times. However, electron-vue has a larger community and more established ecosystem, which may be beneficial for some projects. The choice between the two depends on specific project requirements and developer preferences.