Pros of angular-cli

• Official Angular tool, ensuring better long-term support and compatibility
• Provides a complete development environment with built-in testing and deployment tools
• Offers a more standardized project structure and best practices for Angular applications

Cons of angular-cli

• Less flexible than generator-gulp-angular for customizing build processes
• Steeper learning curve for developers new to Angular ecosystem
• May include unnecessary dependencies for simpler projects

Code Comparison

generator-gulp-angular:

gulp.task('build', ['html', 'fonts', 'other']);

angular-cli:

"scripts": {
  "build": "ng build",
  "test": "ng test",
  "lint": "ng lint"
}

Key Differences

• generator-gulp-angular uses Gulp for task automation, while angular-cli uses its own CLI commands
• angular-cli provides a more opinionated project structure and development workflow
• generator-gulp-angular offers more flexibility in configuring build processes, but requires more manual setup

Conclusion

angular-cli is better suited for developers who want a standardized, officially supported Angular development environment. generator-gulp-angular may be preferred by those who need more control over their build process and are comfortable with Gulp-based workflows.

Pros of generator-angular

• More established and widely used in the Angular community
• Offers a broader range of sub-generators for various Angular components
• Better documentation and community support

Cons of generator-angular

• Less focus on modern front-end development workflows
• Slower to adopt newer Angular versions and features
• Limited built-in optimization and build process options

Code Comparison

generator-angular:

angular.module('myApp', [])
  .controller('MainCtrl', function($scope) {
    $scope.awesomeThings = [
      'HTML5 Boilerplate',
      'AngularJS',
      'Karma'
    ];
  });

generator-gulp-angular:

export class MainController {
  constructor () {
    'ngInject';
    this.awesomeThings = [
      'HTML5 Boilerplate',
      'AngularJS',
      'Karma'
    ];
  }
}

Key Differences

• generator-gulp-angular focuses on modern JavaScript syntax and Gulp-based workflows
• generator-angular uses traditional AngularJS patterns and Grunt for build processes
• generator-gulp-angular provides more out-of-the-box optimizations and build configurations
• generator-angular offers more flexibility in terms of project structure and customization

Both generators aim to scaffold Angular applications, but generator-gulp-angular is more suited for developers looking for a modern, opinionated setup, while generator-angular provides a more traditional and flexible approach.

Pros of generator-angular-fullstack

• Full-stack solution with both front-end and back-end scaffolding
• Includes authentication and user management out of the box
• Offers more comprehensive project structure and features

Cons of generator-angular-fullstack

• Potentially more complex and opinionated setup
• May include unnecessary features for smaller projects
• Steeper learning curve for beginners

Code Comparison

generator-gulp-angular:

gulp.task('serve', ['watch'], function () {
  browserSync.init({
    server: {
      baseDir: '.tmp/serve',
      routes: {
        '/bower_components': 'bower_components'
      }
    }
  });
});

generator-angular-fullstack:

gulp.task('serve', cb => {
  runSequence(
    [
      'clean:tmp',
      'lint:scripts',
      'inject',
      'copy:fonts:dev',
      'env:all'
    ],
    ['start:server', 'start:client'],
    'watch',
    cb
  );
});

The code comparison shows that generator-angular-fullstack has a more complex serve task with additional steps, reflecting its full-stack nature. generator-gulp-angular focuses primarily on front-end tasks, resulting in a simpler configuration.

Both generators use Gulp for task automation, but generator-angular-fullstack provides a more comprehensive development environment suitable for larger, full-stack applications. generator-gulp-angular is more focused on front-end development and may be better suited for smaller, client-side projects or for developers who prefer more control over their back-end setup.