Pros of Microsoft-Activation-Scripts

• More comprehensive activation options, including Office products
• Regularly updated with new activation methods
• Supports both GUI and command-line interfaces

Cons of Microsoft-Activation-Scripts

• More complex to use, especially for novice users
• Requires running PowerShell scripts, which may be blocked by some security settings
• Larger file size due to multiple activation methods

Code Comparison

CMWTAT_Digital_Edition (C#):

public static bool ActivateWindows()
{
    string productKey = GetWindowsKey();
    return InstallProductKey(productKey);
}

Microsoft-Activation-Scripts (PowerShell):

function Activate-Windows {
    $productKey = Get-WindowsKey
    $result = Install-ProductKey -Key $productKey
    return $result
}

Both projects aim to activate Windows, but Microsoft-Activation-Scripts offers more flexibility and options. CMWTAT_Digital_Edition is simpler and more user-friendly, while Microsoft-Activation-Scripts provides advanced features for power users. The code snippets show similar approaches, with Microsoft-Activation-Scripts using PowerShell for broader system access.

Pros of KMS_VL_ALL_AIO

• Supports a wider range of Microsoft products, including Office and Windows Server
• Offers more activation methods, including KMS38 and Online KMS
• Provides detailed logging and troubleshooting options

Cons of KMS_VL_ALL_AIO

• More complex user interface, potentially less user-friendly for beginners
• Requires more manual configuration for specific activation scenarios
• Larger file size due to comprehensive feature set

Code Comparison

CMWTAT_Digital_Edition (C#):

public static bool ActivateWindows()
{
    Process p = new Process();
    p.StartInfo.FileName = "cmd.exe";
    p.StartInfo.UseShellExecute = false;
    p.StartInfo.RedirectStandardInput = true;
    p.StartInfo.RedirectStandardOutput = true;
    p.StartInfo.CreateNoWindow = true;
    p.Start();
    p.StandardInput.WriteLine("slmgr /skms kms.digiboy.ir");
    p.StandardInput.WriteLine("slmgr /ato");
    p.StandardInput.WriteLine("exit");
    string output = p.StandardOutput.ReadToEnd();
    p.WaitForExit();
    return output.Contains("successfully") || output.Contains("成功");
}

KMS_VL_ALL_AIO (Batch):

:KMS38
set "KMS38=1"
set "KMS38Life=1"
set "_oA=0"
set "_oApp=0"
set "_oV=11"
set "verb=0"
set "WinDivert="
set "DLL="
set "_cExit=0"

Pros of vlmcsd

• Lightweight and efficient KMS emulator
• Cross-platform support (Windows, Linux, macOS)
• Command-line interface for advanced users

Cons of vlmcsd

• Requires more technical knowledge to set up and use
• Limited user interface, may be intimidating for beginners
• Lacks built-in activation tools for Windows

Code Comparison

CMWTAT_Digital_Edition (C#):

public static bool ActivateWindows()
{
    string productKey = GetWindowsKey();
    return InstallProductKey(productKey) && ActivateInstalledKey();
}

vlmcsd (C):

int main(int argc, CARGV argv)
{
    parseCommandLine(argc, argv);
    runServer();
    return 0;
}

CMWTAT_Digital_Edition focuses on Windows activation with a user-friendly interface, while vlmcsd is a more versatile KMS emulator that requires manual configuration. CMWTAT_Digital_Edition provides a streamlined activation process, whereas vlmcsd offers greater flexibility and cross-platform support for advanced users.

Pros of KMS_VL_ALL

• Supports a wider range of Microsoft products, including Office and Windows Server
• Offers more activation methods, including KMS38 and Online KMS
• Provides detailed documentation and usage instructions

Cons of KMS_VL_ALL

• More complex setup and usage compared to CMWTAT_Digital_Edition
• Requires manual script execution and potentially more user intervention
• May trigger antivirus software due to its nature as a KMS emulator

Code Comparison

CMWTAT_Digital_Edition (C#):

public static bool ActivateWindows()
{
    string productKey = GetWindowsKey();
    return InstallProductKey(productKey);
}

KMS_VL_ALL (Batch):

:KMS38
if "%_verb%" EQU "1" (
echo.
echo %line%
echo Running KMS38 activation for Windows...
echo %line%
echo.)

The CMWTAT_Digital_Edition uses a C# method to activate Windows, while KMS_VL_ALL employs batch scripting for various activation methods, including KMS38. CMWTAT_Digital_Edition focuses on a simpler, more straightforward approach, while KMS_VL_ALL offers more flexibility and options for activation.