Pros of CMWTAT_Digital_Edition

• User-friendly graphical interface for easier activation
• Supports digital license activation, which can be more persistent
• Regular updates and active community support

Cons of CMWTAT_Digital_Edition

• Limited to Windows 10 and 11 activation only
• May trigger antivirus software due to its activation method
• Less comprehensive documentation compared to KMS_VL_ALL_AIO

Code Comparison

KMS_VL_ALL_AIO (batch script):

@echo off
set "params=%*"
cd /d "%~dp0" && ( if exist "%temp%\getadmin.vbs" del "%temp%\getadmin.vbs" ) && fsutil dirty query %systemdrive% 1>nul 2>nul || (  echo Set UAC = CreateObject^("Shell.Application"^) : UAC.ShellExecute "cmd.exe", "/k cd ""%~sdp0"" && %~s0 %params%", "", "runas", 1 >> "%temp%\getadmin.vbs" && "%temp%\getadmin.vbs" && exit /B )

CMWTAT_Digital_Edition (C# code):

public static bool InstallProductKey(string key)
{
    var process = new Process();
    process.StartInfo.FileName = "cscript";
    process.StartInfo.Arguments = $"//NoLogo //B \"%windir%\\system32\\slmgr.vbs\" /ipk {key}";
    process.StartInfo.UseShellExecute = false;
    process.StartInfo.CreateNoWindow = true;
    process.Start();
    process.WaitForExit();
    return process.ExitCode == 0;
}

Pros of KMS_VL_ALL

• Simpler and more lightweight implementation
• Focuses specifically on KMS activation for Windows and Office
• May be easier to understand and modify for advanced users

Cons of KMS_VL_ALL

• Less comprehensive feature set compared to KMS_VL_ALL_AIO
• Potentially less user-friendly for novice users
• May require more manual configuration in some cases

Code Comparison

KMS_VL_ALL:

@echo off
set KMS_Emulation=1
set KMS_ActivationInterval=43200
set KMS_RenewalInterval=43200
set KMS_HWID=0x3A1C049600B60076

KMS_VL_ALL_AIO:

@echo off & setlocal EnableExtensions DisableDelayedExpansion
set "_cmdf=%~f0"
if exist "%SystemRoot%\Sysnative\cmd.exe" (
setlocal EnableDelayedExpansion
start %SystemRoot%\Sysnative\cmd.exe /c ""!_cmdf!" %*"
exit /b
)

The code comparison shows that KMS_VL_ALL has a simpler initialization process, while KMS_VL_ALL_AIO includes more advanced features and compatibility checks. KMS_VL_ALL_AIO's code is more complex but offers greater flexibility and functionality.

Both projects aim to provide KMS activation solutions, but KMS_VL_ALL_AIO offers a more comprehensive and user-friendly approach, while KMS_VL_ALL is more focused and potentially easier to customize for advanced users.

Pros of LTSC-Add-MicrosoftStore

• Specifically designed for adding Microsoft Store to LTSC editions of Windows
• Simpler and more focused functionality
• Regularly updated to support the latest LTSC versions

Cons of LTSC-Add-MicrosoftStore

• Limited to Microsoft Store installation, lacks broader activation features
• May require more manual intervention for non-LTSC Windows editions
• Less comprehensive documentation compared to KMS_VL_ALL_AIO

Code Comparison

LTSC-Add-MicrosoftStore:

powershell -command "Add-AppxPackage -Path .\Microsoft.NET.Native.Framework.1.7_1.7.27413.0_x64__8wekyb3d8bbwe.Appx"
powershell -command "Add-AppxPackage -Path .\Microsoft.NET.Native.Runtime.1.7_1.7.25531.0_x64__8wekyb3d8bbwe.Appx"
powershell -command "Add-AppxPackage -Path .\Microsoft.VCLibs.140.00_14.0.27323.0_x64__8wekyb3d8bbwe.Appx"

KMS_VL_ALL_AIO:

:KMS38
if !_verb!==1 (
echo.
echo ============================================================
echo Activating Windows KMS38...
echo ============================================================
)

The code snippets show that LTSC-Add-MicrosoftStore focuses on adding specific packages using PowerShell commands, while KMS_VL_ALL_AIO includes broader activation scripts with more complex logic for different Windows editions and activation methods.