Top Related Projects
Microsoft REST API Guidelines
A model set of guidelines for RESTful APIs and Events, created by Zalando
The OpenAPI Specification Repository
Style guides for Google-originated open-source projects
Quick Overview
The WhiteHouse/api-standards repository contains a set of guidelines and best practices for designing and implementing APIs within the U.S. government. These standards aim to promote consistency, interoperability, and ease of use across various government agencies' APIs, ensuring a better experience for developers and end-users.
Pros
- Promotes consistency and standardization across government APIs
- Improves developer experience and reduces learning curve for working with different agency APIs
- Encourages best practices in API design, security, and documentation
- Facilitates interoperability between different government systems and services
Cons
- May not be suitable for all types of APIs or specific agency requirements
- Could potentially limit innovation if applied too rigidly
- Requires ongoing maintenance and updates to keep up with evolving API technologies and practices
- May face challenges in widespread adoption across all government agencies
Getting Started
To get started with the WhiteHouse API standards:
- Visit the repository at https://github.com/WhiteHouse/api-standards
- Read through the README.md file for an overview of the standards
- Explore the individual markdown files in the repository for detailed guidelines on specific topics
- Consider implementing these standards in your own API development projects within government agencies
- Contribute to the project by submitting issues or pull requests for improvements or updates to the standards
Competitor Comparisons
Microsoft REST API Guidelines
Pros of api-guidelines
- More comprehensive and detailed, covering a wider range of API design topics
- Regularly updated with contributions from the community
- Includes practical examples and code snippets for better understanding
Cons of api-guidelines
- May be overwhelming for beginners due to its extensive content
- Primarily focused on Microsoft's REST API design principles, which may not be universally applicable
- Requires more time to read and implement due to its length and complexity
Code Comparison
api-standards:
GET /articles?page=2&per_page=10
api-guidelines:
GET /articles?$skip=10&$top=10
GET /articles?$filter=publishedDate ge 2021-01-01
The api-guidelines example demonstrates more advanced querying capabilities, including filtering and pagination using OData-style parameters.
Summary
While api-standards provides a concise set of guidelines for government APIs, api-guidelines offers a more comprehensive and detailed approach to API design. The Microsoft repository is better suited for complex enterprise applications, whereas the WhiteHouse repository focuses on simplicity and consistency for government services. Both repositories have their merits, and the choice between them depends on the specific needs and complexity of the API project.
A model set of guidelines for RESTful APIs and Events, created by Zalando
Pros of restful-api-guidelines
- More comprehensive and detailed guidelines, covering a wider range of API design aspects
- Regularly updated and maintained by a large community of contributors
- Includes practical examples and code snippets for better understanding
Cons of restful-api-guidelines
- More complex and potentially overwhelming for beginners or smaller projects
- Some guidelines may be specific to Zalando's ecosystem and not universally applicable
- Requires more time and effort to fully implement and adhere to all guidelines
Code comparison
restful-api-guidelines:
paths:
/articles:
get:
summary: List articles
responses:
200:
description: Successful response
content:
application/json:
schema:
$ref: '#/components/schemas/ArticleList'
api-standards:
{
"pagination": {
"count": 100,
"page": 4,
"per_page": 25,
"pages": 4,
"next": "/articles?page=5&per_page=25",
"prev": "/articles?page=3&per_page=25"
},
"data": [
{
"id": "1234",
"title": "Sample Article"
}
]
}
The code comparison shows that restful-api-guidelines uses OpenAPI specification for defining API endpoints, while api-standards focuses on response structure and pagination.
The OpenAPI Specification Repository
Pros of OpenAPI-Specification
- More comprehensive and detailed specification for describing RESTful APIs
- Widely adopted industry standard with extensive tooling support
- Machine-readable format enables automatic code generation and documentation
Cons of OpenAPI-Specification
- More complex and potentially overwhelming for simple API designs
- Requires more effort to create and maintain compared to simpler guidelines
- May not cover all aspects of API design and governance
Code Comparison
api-standards:
No specific code examples provided in the repository
OpenAPI-Specification:
openapi: 3.0.0
info:
title: Sample API
version: 1.0.0
paths:
/users:
get:
summary: Returns a list of users
Summary
The api-standards repository provides high-level guidelines for API design and best practices, focusing on general principles and recommendations. It's more suitable for organizations looking to establish basic API standards.
OpenAPI-Specification, on the other hand, offers a detailed, structured approach to describing RESTful APIs. It provides a machine-readable format that enables automatic code generation, documentation, and testing. While more complex, it offers greater flexibility and tooling support for API development and management.
The choice between the two depends on the organization's needs, existing infrastructure, and desired level of API standardization and automation.
Style guides for Google-originated open-source projects
Pros of styleguide
- Covers a wider range of programming languages and style guidelines
- More comprehensive and detailed, addressing various aspects of coding practices
- Regularly updated and maintained by Google's engineering team
Cons of styleguide
- May be overly complex for smaller projects or teams
- Some guidelines might be specific to Google's internal practices and not universally applicable
- Lacks focus on API-specific standards and best practices
Code Comparison
styleguide (Python):
def SampleFunction(a, b):
"""A brief description of the function.
Args:
a: First argument description.
b: Second argument description.
Returns:
Description of the return value.
"""
return a + b
api-standards (JSON):
{
"id": 1234,
"name": "Example Resource",
"created_at": "2023-05-15T14:30:00Z",
"updated_at": "2023-05-15T14:30:00Z"
}
Summary
styleguide offers a broader scope of coding standards across multiple languages, while api-standards focuses specifically on RESTful API design and implementation. styleguide provides more detailed guidelines but may be overwhelming for smaller teams, whereas api-standards offers a concise set of best practices for API development. The choice between the two depends on the project's needs and scope.
Convert designs to code with AI
Introducing Visual Copilot: A new AI model to turn Figma designs to high quality code using your components.
Try Visual CopilotREADME
White House Web API Standards
- Guidelines
- Pragmatic REST
- RESTful URLs
- HTTP Verbs
- Responses
- Error handling
- Versions
- Record limits
- Request & Response Examples
- Mock Responses
- JSONP
Guidelines
This document provides guidelines and examples for White House Web APIs, encouraging consistency, maintainability, and best practices across applications. White House APIs aim to balance a truly RESTful API interface with a positive developer experience (DX).
This document borrows heavily from:
- Designing HTTP Interfaces and RESTful Web Services
- API Facade Pattern, by Brian Mulloy, Apigee
- Web API Design, by Brian Mulloy, Apigee
- Fielding's Dissertation on REST
Pragmatic REST
These guidelines aim to support a truly RESTful API. Here are a few exceptions:
- Put the version number of the API in the URL (see examples below). Donât accept any requests that do not specify a version number.
- Allow users to request formats like JSON or XML like this:
RESTful URLs
General guidelines for RESTful URLs
- A URL identifies a resource.
- URLs should include nouns, not verbs.
- Use plural nouns only for consistency (no singular nouns).
- Use HTTP verbs (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE) to operate on the collections and elements.
- You shouldnât need to go deeper than resource/identifier/resource.
- Put the version number at the base of your URL, for example http://example.com/v1/path/to/resource.
- URL v. header:
- If it changes the logic you write to handle the response, put it in the URL.
- If it doesnât change the logic for each response, like OAuth info, put it in the header.
- Specify optional fields in a comma separated list.
- Formats should be in the form of api/v2/resource/{id}.json
Good URL examples
- List of magazines:
- Filtering is a query:
- A single magazine in JSON format:
- All articles in (or belonging to) this magazine:
- All articles in this magazine in XML format:
- Specify optional fields in a comma separated list:
- Add a new article to a particular magazine:
Bad URL examples
- Non-plural noun:
- Verb in URL:
- Filter outside of query string
HTTP Verbs
HTTP verbs, or methods, should be used in compliance with their definitions under the HTTP/1.1 standard. The action taken on the representation will be contextual to the media type being worked on and its current state. Here's an example of how HTTP verbs map to create, read, update, delete operations in a particular context:
HTTP METHOD | POST | GET | PUT | DELETE |
---|---|---|---|---|
CRUD OP | CREATE | READ | UPDATE | DELETE |
/dogs | Create new dogs | List dogs | Bulk update | Delete all dogs |
/dogs/1234 | Error | Show Bo | If exists, update Bo; If not, error | Delete Bo |
(Example from Web API Design, by Brian Mulloy, Apigee.)
Responses
- No values in keys
- No internal-specific names (e.g. "node" and "taxonomy term")
- Metadata should only contain direct properties of the response set, not properties of the members of the response set
Good examples
No values in keys:
"tags": [
{"id": "125", "name": "Environment"},
{"id": "834", "name": "Water Quality"}
],
Bad examples
Values in keys:
"tags": [
{"125": "Environment"},
{"834": "Water Quality"}
],
Error handling
Error responses should include a common HTTP status code, message for the developer, message for the end-user (when appropriate), internal error code (corresponding to some specific internally determined ID), links where developers can find more info. For example:
{
"status" : 400,
"developerMessage" : "Verbose, plain language description of the problem. Provide developers
suggestions about how to solve their problems here",
"userMessage" : "This is a message that can be passed along to end-users, if needed.",
"errorCode" : "444444",
"moreInfo" : "http://www.example.gov/developer/path/to/help/for/444444,
http://drupal.org/node/444444",
}
Use three simple, common response codes indicating (1) success, (2) failure due to client-side problem, (3) failure due to server-side problem:
- 200 - OK
- 400 - Bad Request
- 500 - Internal Server Error
Versions
- Never release an API without a version number.
- Versions should be integers, not decimal numbers, prefixed with âvâ. For example:
- Good: v1, v2, v3
- Bad: v-1.1, v1.2, 1.3
- Maintain APIs at least one version back.
Record limits
- If no limit is specified, return results with a default limit.
- To get records 51 through 75 do this:
- http://example.gov/magazines?limit=25&offset=50
- offset=50 means, âskip the first 50 recordsâ
- limit=25 means, âreturn a maximum of 25 recordsâ
Information about record limits and total available count should also be included in the response. Example:
{
"metadata": {
"resultset": {
"count": 227,
"offset": 25,
"limit": 25
}
},
"results": []
}
Request & Response Examples
API Resources
GET /magazines
Example: http://example.gov/api/v1/magazines.json
Response body:
{
"metadata": {
"resultset": {
"count": 123,
"offset": 0,
"limit": 10
}
},
"results": [
{
"id": "1234",
"type": "magazine",
"title": "Public Water Systems",
"tags": [
{"id": "125", "name": "Environment"},
{"id": "834", "name": "Water Quality"}
],
"created": "1231621302"
},
{
"id": 2351,
"type": "magazine",
"title": "Public Schools",
"tags": [
{"id": "125", "name": "Elementary"},
{"id": "834", "name": "Charter Schools"}
],
"created": "126251302"
}
{
"id": 2351,
"type": "magazine",
"title": "Public Schools",
"tags": [
{"id": "125", "name": "Pre-school"},
],
"created": "126251302"
}
]
}
GET /magazines/[id]
Example: http://example.gov/api/v1/magazines/[id].json
Response body:
{
"id": "1234",
"type": "magazine",
"title": "Public Water Systems",
"tags": [
{"id": "125", "name": "Environment"},
{"id": "834", "name": "Water Quality"}
],
"created": "1231621302"
}
POST /magazines/[id]/articles
Example: Create â POST http://example.gov/api/v1/magazines/[id]/articles
Request body:
[
{
"title": "Raising Revenue",
"author_first_name": "Jane",
"author_last_name": "Smith",
"author_email": "jane.smith@example.gov",
"year": "2012",
"month": "August",
"day": "18",
"text": "Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Etiam eget ante ut augue scelerisque ornare. Aliquam tempus rhoncus quam vel luctus. Sed scelerisque fermentum fringilla. Suspendisse tincidunt nisl a metus feugiat vitae vestibulum enim vulputate. Quisque vehicula dictum elit, vitae cursus libero auctor sed. Vestibulum fermentum elementum nunc. Proin aliquam erat in turpis vehicula sit amet tristique lorem blandit. Nam augue est, bibendum et ultrices non, interdum in est. Quisque gravida orci lobortis... "
}
]
Mock Responses
It is suggested that each resource accept a 'mock' parameter on the testing server. Passing this parameter should return a mock data response (bypassing the backend).
Implementing this feature early in development ensures that the API will exhibit consistent behavior, supporting a test driven development methodology.
Note: If the mock parameter is included in a request to the production environment, an error should be raised.
JSONP
JSONP is easiest explained with an example. Here's one from StackOverflow:
Say you're on domain abc.com, and you want to make a request to domain xyz.com. To do so, you need to cross domain boundaries, a no-no in most of browserland.
The one item that bypasses this limitation is
<script>
tags. When you use a script tag, the domain limitation is ignored, but under normal circumstances, you can't really DO anything with the results, the script just gets evaluated.
Enter JSONP. When you make your request to a server that is JSONP enabled, you pass a special parameter that tells the server a little bit about your page. That way, the server is able to nicely wrap up its response in a way that your page can handle.
For example, say the server expects a parameter called "callback" to enable its JSONP capabilities. Then your request would look like:
http://www.xyz.com/sample.aspx?callback=mycallback
Without JSONP, this might return some basic javascript object, like so:
{ foo: 'bar' }
However, with JSONP, when the server receives the "callback" parameter, it wraps up the result a little differently, returning something like this:
mycallback({ foo: 'bar' });
As you can see, it will now invoke the method you specified. So, in your page, you define the callback function:
mycallback = function(data){ alert(data.foo); };
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2067472/what-is-jsonp-all-about?answertab=votes#tab-top
Top Related Projects
Microsoft REST API Guidelines
A model set of guidelines for RESTful APIs and Events, created by Zalando
The OpenAPI Specification Repository
Style guides for Google-originated open-source projects
Convert designs to code with AI
Introducing Visual Copilot: A new AI model to turn Figma designs to high quality code using your components.
Try Visual Copilot