Pros of iScroll

• Open-source and free to use
• Lightweight and focused on scrolling functionality
• Supports various input methods (mouse, touchpad, keyboard)

Cons of iScroll

• Less actively maintained (last update in 2018)
• Limited features compared to Mobiscroll's comprehensive UI components
• May require more custom development for advanced functionality

Code Comparison

Mobiscroll (initializing a scrollable list):

mobiscroll.scroller('#myElement', {
    theme: 'ios',
    display: 'bottom',
    wheels: [
        [{text: 'Option 1', value: 1}, {text: 'Option 2', value: 2}]
    ]
});

iScroll (initializing a scrollable element):

var myScroll = new IScroll('#wrapper', {
    scrollX: true,
    scrollY: true,
    mouseWheel: true,
    wheelAction: 'zoom'
});

Both libraries aim to enhance scrolling experiences, but Mobiscroll offers a more comprehensive set of UI components and is actively maintained. iScroll focuses primarily on scrolling functionality and is lighter weight. The choice between them depends on project requirements, with Mobiscroll being better suited for complex UI needs and iScroll for simpler scrolling implementations.

Pros of tablesorter

• Free and open-source, allowing for customization and community contributions
• Extensive documentation and examples available
• Lightweight and easy to implement for basic table sorting needs

Cons of tablesorter

• Limited to table sorting functionality, lacking the comprehensive UI components of Mobiscroll
• May require additional plugins or custom code for more advanced features
• Less frequent updates compared to Mobiscroll's active development

Code Comparison

tablesorter:

$("#myTable").tablesorter({
  theme: 'blue',
  widgets: ['zebra', 'filter'],
  sortList: [[0,0], [1,0]]
});

Mobiscroll:

mobiscroll.datepicker('#myDatePicker', {
  theme: 'ios',
  display: 'bubble',
  controls: ['calendar', 'time']
});

While tablesorter focuses on enhancing HTML tables with sorting capabilities, Mobiscroll provides a wider range of UI components, including date pickers, as shown in the code examples. tablesorter is more specialized for table manipulation, whereas Mobiscroll offers a broader set of tools for creating interactive mobile and desktop interfaces.

Pros of bootstrap-datepicker

• Lightweight and simple to use
• Extensive documentation and community support
• Free and open-source

Cons of bootstrap-datepicker

• Limited features compared to Mobiscroll
• Less modern UI and customization options
• Lacks advanced components like timepickers or range selectors

Code Comparison

bootstrap-datepicker:

$('#datepicker').datepicker({
    format: 'mm/dd/yyyy',
    startDate: '-3d'
});

Mobiscroll:

mobiscroll.datepicker('#demo', {
    controls: ['calendar', 'time'],
    display: 'inline',
    touchUi: true
});

Summary

Bootstrap-datepicker is a lightweight, open-source solution that's easy to implement and well-documented. It's suitable for basic date picking needs but lacks advanced features and modern UI elements. Mobiscroll, on the other hand, offers a more comprehensive suite of UI components with advanced functionality and customization options, but it comes at a cost and may be overkill for simple projects.

The code comparison shows that bootstrap-datepicker has a simpler setup, while Mobiscroll offers more built-in controls and display options out of the box. Developers should consider their project requirements, budget, and desired user experience when choosing between these two libraries.

Pros of Daterangepicker

• Lightweight and focused on date range selection
• Open-source and free to use
• Easy integration with Bootstrap and jQuery

Cons of Daterangepicker

• Limited to date and time selection functionality
• Less customizable UI compared to Mobiscroll
• Fewer input types and form controls

Code Comparison

Daterangepicker:

$('input[name="daterange"]').daterangepicker({
    opens: 'left'
}, function(start, end, label) {
    console.log("A new date selection was made: " + start.format('YYYY-MM-DD') + ' to ' + end.format('YYYY-MM-DD'));
});

Mobiscroll:

mobiscroll.datepicker('#demo', {
    controls: ['calendar', 'time'],
    display: 'inline',
    touchUi: true
});

Daterangepicker focuses on date range selection with a simpler API, while Mobiscroll offers a more comprehensive set of UI controls and customization options. Daterangepicker is ideal for projects requiring basic date range functionality, whereas Mobiscroll suits complex UI requirements across various form inputs and controls.

Pros of Datepicker

• Lightweight and simple, with a smaller footprint than Mobiscroll
• Open-source and free to use, without licensing restrictions
• Easy to customize with CSS and minimal JavaScript

Cons of Datepicker

• Limited features compared to Mobiscroll's extensive UI components
• Less cross-platform compatibility, primarily focused on web browsers
• Fewer pre-built themes and styling options

Code Comparison

Datepicker initialization:

$('.datepicker').datepicker({
  format: 'yyyy-mm-dd',
  autoHide: true
});

Mobiscroll initialization:

mobiscroll.datepicker('#demo', {
  controls: ['calendar'],
  display: 'inline'
});

Both libraries offer simple initialization, but Mobiscroll provides more configuration options out of the box. Datepicker focuses on a straightforward date selection interface, while Mobiscroll offers a wider range of UI controls and display options.

Datepicker is ideal for projects requiring a basic date picker with minimal overhead, whereas Mobiscroll is better suited for complex applications needing extensive UI components and cross-platform compatibility. The choice between the two depends on the specific requirements of your project and the level of customization and features needed.

Pros of Pikaday

• Lightweight and dependency-free
• Open-source and free to use
• Easy to customize and extend

Cons of Pikaday

• Limited built-in features compared to Mobiscroll
• Less frequent updates and maintenance
• Fewer pre-built themes and styling options

Code Comparison

Pikaday:

var picker = new Pikaday({
    field: document.getElementById('datepicker'),
    format: 'D MMM YYYY',
    onSelect: function() {
        console.log(this.getMoment().format('Do MMMM YYYY'));
    }
});

Mobiscroll:

mobiscroll.datepicker('#datepicker', {
    controls: ['calendar'],
    display: 'inline',
    onChange: function (event, inst) {
        console.log(inst.getVal());
    }
});

Both libraries offer simple ways to create date pickers, but Mobiscroll provides more built-in options and controls out of the box. Pikaday focuses on a minimalistic approach, while Mobiscroll offers a more feature-rich solution with additional UI components beyond date picking.

Pikaday is ideal for projects requiring a lightweight date picker with basic functionality, while Mobiscroll suits complex applications needing extensive UI components and customization options.