chrome-tabs

Pros of webextensions-examples

• Comprehensive collection of browser extension examples
• Covers a wide range of WebExtension APIs and functionalities
• Maintained by Mozilla Developer Network (MDN), ensuring high-quality and up-to-date examples

Cons of webextensions-examples

• Not focused on a specific feature or functionality
• May require more time to find relevant examples for specific use cases
• Less suitable for direct integration into projects

Code Comparison

webextensions-examples (from borderify example):

document.body.style.border = "5px solid red";

chrome-tabs:

const tabEl = ChromeTabs.createNewTabEl()
chromeTabs.addTab({
  title: 'New Tab',
  favicon: false
})

Summary

webextensions-examples is a comprehensive resource for learning about browser extensions, offering a wide range of examples covering various APIs and functionalities. It's maintained by MDN, ensuring high-quality content. However, it's not focused on a specific feature and may require more time to find relevant examples.

chrome-tabs, on the other hand, is a specialized library for creating Chrome-like tabs in web applications. It offers a more focused solution for developers looking to implement tab functionality in their projects.

The code comparison shows the difference in focus: webextensions-examples demonstrates basic extension functionality, while chrome-tabs provides methods for creating and managing tabs in a web application.

Pros of chrome-extensions-samples

• Comprehensive collection of sample extensions covering various APIs and use cases
• Official Google repository, ensuring up-to-date and best practice examples
• Includes documentation and explanations for each sample

Cons of chrome-extensions-samples

• Focuses on extension development, not specifically on tab management
• May be overwhelming for developers looking for a simple tab-like interface
• Requires more setup and understanding of Chrome extension architecture

Code Comparison

chrome-extensions-samples (from tabs API sample):

chrome.tabs.query({active: true, currentWindow: true}, function(tabs) {
  var tab = tabs[0];
  var url = tab.url;
  document.getElementById('currentLink').innerHTML = url;
});

chrome-tabs:

const tabEl = ChromeTabs.createNewTabEl()
chromeTabs.addTab({
  title: 'New Tab',
  favicon: false
})

Summary

chrome-extensions-samples provides a wide range of examples for Chrome extension development, including tab management. It's ideal for developers looking to create full-fledged extensions. chrome-tabs, on the other hand, focuses specifically on creating a Chrome-like tab interface for web applications, offering a simpler solution for developers who don't need full extension functionality.

Pros of webextension-polyfill

• Provides a standardized API for cross-browser extension development
• Simplifies the process of creating extensions compatible with multiple browsers
• Actively maintained by Mozilla, ensuring regular updates and support

Cons of webextension-polyfill

• Limited to browser extension development, not applicable for general web development
• May introduce a slight performance overhead due to the abstraction layer
• Requires additional setup and integration into extension projects

Code Comparison

webextension-polyfill:

browser.tabs.query({active: true, currentWindow: true}).then(tabs => {
  browser.tabs.sendMessage(tabs[0].id, {greeting: "Hello"});
});

chrome-tabs:

const tab = new ChromeTab({
  title: 'New Tab',
  favicon: 'icon.png'
});
tabBar.addTab(tab);

Summary

While webextension-polyfill focuses on providing a unified API for cross-browser extension development, chrome-tabs is a UI component library for creating Chrome-like tabs in web applications. The projects serve different purposes and are not directly comparable in terms of functionality. webextension-polyfill is more suitable for browser extension developers seeking cross-browser compatibility, while chrome-tabs is ideal for web developers looking to implement a tab-based interface in their applications.