Pros of fullcalendar

• More comprehensive and feature-rich calendar solution
• Regular updates and active maintenance
• Extensive documentation and community support

Cons of fullcalendar

• Steeper learning curve due to more complex API
• Requires additional setup for Angular integration

Code Comparison

ui-calendar:

<div ui-calendar="calendarOptions" ng-model="eventSources"></div>

fullcalendar:

<full-calendar [options]="calendarOptions"></full-calendar>

Key Differences

• ui-calendar is specifically designed for AngularJS, while fullcalendar is framework-agnostic but can be integrated with Angular
• fullcalendar offers more customization options and plugins
• ui-calendar has a simpler API, making it easier to get started for basic use cases

Performance

• fullcalendar generally offers better performance, especially for large datasets
• ui-calendar may have performance issues with complex configurations or large numbers of events

Community and Support

• fullcalendar has a larger and more active community
• More third-party resources and tutorials available for fullcalendar

Integration

• ui-calendar integrates seamlessly with AngularJS projects
• fullcalendar requires additional wrapper components for Angular integration but offers more flexibility for use with other frameworks

Pros of ui-grid

• More comprehensive data grid solution with advanced features like sorting, filtering, and pagination
• Better performance for handling large datasets
• More active development and community support

Cons of ui-grid

• Steeper learning curve due to its complexity
• Heavier and may impact page load times
• Less flexibility for customization compared to simpler calendar components

Code Comparison

ui-grid:

<div ui-grid="gridOptions" class="myGrid"></div>

$scope.gridOptions = {
  enableSorting: true,
  columnDefs: [
    { field: 'name' },
    { field: 'age', type: 'number' }
  ],
  data: [/* ... */]
};

ui-calendar:

<div ui-calendar="calendarOptions" ng-model="eventSources"></div>

$scope.calendarOptions = {
  editable: true,
  header: {
    left: 'month basicWeek basicDay agendaWeek agendaDay',
    center: 'title',
    right: 'today prev,next'
  }
};

Summary

ui-grid is a more powerful and feature-rich solution for displaying tabular data, while ui-calendar focuses specifically on calendar functionality. ui-grid offers better performance for large datasets but comes with increased complexity. ui-calendar provides a simpler implementation for calendar-specific use cases but may lack advanced data handling capabilities. The choice between the two depends on the specific requirements of your project and the type of data you need to display.

Pros of Material

• Comprehensive UI component library with a wide range of pre-built elements
• Follows Material Design principles, ensuring a modern and consistent look
• Actively maintained by the Angular team with frequent updates

Cons of Material

• Larger bundle size due to the extensive component library
• Steeper learning curve for developers new to Material Design concepts
• May require additional customization to fit specific design requirements

Code Comparison

ui-calendar:

<ui-calendar ng-model="eventSources" calendar="myCalendar"></ui-calendar>

Material:

<mat-calendar [selected]="selectedDate" (selectedChange)="onDateSelected($event)">
</mat-calendar>

Key Differences

• ui-calendar focuses specifically on calendar functionality, while Material provides a broader set of UI components
• Material offers a more modern and visually appealing design out of the box
• ui-calendar may be easier to integrate for simple calendar needs, while Material requires more setup but provides greater flexibility

Use Cases

• Choose ui-calendar for projects that primarily need a calendar component with minimal additional UI requirements
• Opt for Material when building a comprehensive Angular application that benefits from a consistent design system and a wide range of UI components

Pros of angular-cli

• Comprehensive tooling for Angular development, including project scaffolding, build optimization, and testing
• Active development and maintenance by the Angular team
• Extensive documentation and community support

Cons of angular-cli

• Steeper learning curve for beginners
• More complex setup compared to simpler UI components
• Larger project footprint and potential overhead for small applications

Code Comparison

ui-calendar:

angular.module('myApp', ['ui.calendar'])
  .controller('CalendarCtrl', function($scope) {
    $scope.eventSources = [];
  });

angular-cli:

import { Component } from '@angular/core';

@Component({
  selector: 'app-root',
  templateUrl: './app.component.html',
  styleUrls: ['./app.component.css']
})
export class AppComponent { }

Summary

ui-calendar is a specific UI component for calendars in AngularJS, while angular-cli is a comprehensive command-line interface for developing Angular applications. angular-cli offers more extensive features for full-scale Angular development but may be overkill for simple UI components. ui-calendar is more focused and easier to integrate for calendar functionality but lacks the broader development tools provided by angular-cli.

Pros of components

• More comprehensive set of UI components beyond just calendars
• Actively maintained with frequent updates and bug fixes
• Better integration with modern Angular versions

Cons of components

• Steeper learning curve due to more complex architecture
• Potentially heavier bundle size if using multiple components

Code Comparison

ui-calendar:

<div ui-calendar="calendarOptions" ng-model="eventSources"></div>

components:

<mat-calendar [selected]="selectedDate" (selectedChange)="onSelect($event)">
</mat-calendar>

Summary

components offers a more extensive set of UI components and is actively maintained, making it a better choice for modern Angular applications. However, it may have a steeper learning curve and potentially larger bundle size compared to ui-calendar.

ui-calendar is simpler to implement for basic calendar functionality but lacks the breadth of features and ongoing support that components provides.

The code comparison shows that ui-calendar uses a directive approach with options passed as attributes, while components uses a more declarative component-based syntax with Angular's property and event binding.

Pros of ng-bootstrap

• Native Angular implementation, providing better integration and performance
• Regularly updated with new features and bug fixes
• Comprehensive documentation and examples

Cons of ng-bootstrap

• Limited to Bootstrap components, less flexibility for custom designs
• Steeper learning curve for developers unfamiliar with Bootstrap

Code Comparison

ui-calendar:

<ui-calendar ng-model="eventSources" calendar="myCalendar"></ui-calendar>

ng-bootstrap:

<ngb-datepicker [(ngModel)]="model" (navigate)="date = $event.next"></ngb-datepicker>

Key Differences

• ui-calendar focuses specifically on calendar functionality, while ng-bootstrap provides a wide range of UI components
• ng-bootstrap is built natively for Angular, whereas ui-calendar is an AngularJS plugin
• ui-calendar requires additional dependencies like jQuery and FullCalendar, while ng-bootstrap is self-contained

Use Cases

• Choose ui-calendar for projects requiring advanced calendar features
• Opt for ng-bootstrap when building a comprehensive Angular application with Bootstrap-style components

Community and Support

• ng-bootstrap has a larger community and more frequent updates
• ui-calendar has a smaller, more specialized user base

Integration

• ng-bootstrap seamlessly integrates with Angular projects
• ui-calendar may require additional configuration for modern Angular applications