beautiful-react-hooks

Pros of react-use

• Larger collection of hooks (100+) covering a wide range of use cases
• More frequent updates and active maintenance
• Extensive documentation with examples for each hook

Cons of react-use

• Larger bundle size due to the extensive collection of hooks
• Some hooks may have a steeper learning curve for beginners
• Potential performance impact when importing the entire library

Code Comparison

react-use:

import { useToggle, useList } from 'react-use';

const [isOn, toggleOn] = useToggle(false);
const [list, { push, filter }] = useList([1, 2, 3]);

beautiful-react-hooks:

import { useToggle, useArrayState } from 'beautiful-react-hooks';

const [isOn, toggleOn] = useToggle(false);
const [list, { add, filter }] = useArrayState([1, 2, 3]);

Both libraries offer similar functionality, but react-use provides a more extensive set of hooks with slightly different naming conventions. The code structure and usage are comparable, making it easy for developers to switch between the two libraries if needed.

Pros of awesome-react-hooks

• Extensive collection of hooks from various sources
• Community-driven with contributions from multiple developers
• Categorized list for easy navigation and discovery

Cons of awesome-react-hooks

• Not a standalone library, just a curated list of hooks
• Requires additional effort to integrate hooks from different sources
• May include outdated or unmaintained hooks

Code Comparison

beautiful-react-hooks:

import { useWindowResize } from 'beautiful-react-hooks';

const MyComponent = () => {
  const { width, height } = useWindowResize();
  return <div>Window size: {width}x{height}</div>;
};

awesome-react-hooks (example from a linked hook):

import { useWindowSize } from '@react-hook/window-size';

const MyComponent = () => {
  const [width, height] = useWindowSize();
  return <div>Window size: {width}x{height}</div>;
};

Summary

beautiful-react-hooks is a standalone library offering a collection of custom hooks, while awesome-react-hooks is a curated list of hooks from various sources. beautiful-react-hooks provides a consistent API and documentation, whereas awesome-react-hooks offers a wider variety of hooks but requires more effort to integrate. The choice between them depends on whether you prefer a single, cohesive library or a diverse collection of hooks from different sources.

Pros of usehooks

• More extensive collection of hooks (30+ vs. 20+)
• Includes TypeScript definitions for better type safety
• Regular updates and active maintenance

Cons of usehooks

• Less detailed documentation for each hook
• Fewer examples and use cases provided
• No internationalization support

Code Comparison

beautiful-react-hooks:

import { useWindowResize } from 'beautiful-react-hooks';

const MyComponent = () => {
  const { width, height } = useWindowResize();
  return <div>Window size: {width}x{height}</div>;
};

usehooks:

import { useWindowSize } from 'usehooks';

const MyComponent = () => {
  const { width, height } = useWindowSize();
  return <div>Window size: {width}x{height}</div>;
};

Both libraries offer similar functionality for common hooks, but usehooks provides a broader range of hooks and better TypeScript support. beautiful-react-hooks, on the other hand, offers more comprehensive documentation and examples for each hook. The code comparison shows that both libraries have similar syntax and usage patterns, making it easy for developers to switch between them if needed.

Pros of react-hanger

• More comprehensive set of hooks, including array and object manipulation
• Better TypeScript support with stricter typing
• More active development and frequent updates

Cons of react-hanger

• Larger bundle size due to more hooks and features
• Steeper learning curve for developers new to custom hooks
• Less focus on UI-specific hooks compared to beautiful-react-hooks

Code Comparison

react-hanger:

const [value, setValue, resetValue] = useInput('initial value');
const [count, { increment, decrement }] = useCounter(0);
const [array, { push, pop, shift, unshift }] = useArray([1, 2, 3]);

beautiful-react-hooks:

const [value, setValue] = useInputValue('initial value');
const [count, increment, decrement] = useCounter(0);
const isOnline = useOnlineState();

Both libraries provide similar functionality for basic hooks like useInput and useCounter. However, react-hanger offers more advanced hooks for array manipulation, while beautiful-react-hooks focuses on simpler, UI-oriented hooks like useOnlineState.

react-hanger is better suited for complex state management scenarios, while beautiful-react-hooks excels in providing a set of easy-to-use hooks for common UI patterns. Developers should choose based on their project requirements and familiarity with custom hooks.

Pros of react-hookz/web

• More extensive collection of hooks (60+ vs 30+)
• Better TypeScript support with stricter types
• More frequent updates and active maintenance

Cons of react-hookz/web

• Steeper learning curve due to larger API surface
• Less focus on simplicity and ease of use
• Potentially higher bundle size due to more hooks

Code Comparison

beautiful-react-hooks:

import { useWindowResize } from 'beautiful-react-hooks';

const MyComponent = () => {
  const { width, height } = useWindowResize();
  return <div>Window size: {width}x{height}</div>;
};

react-hookz/web:

import { useWindowSize } from '@react-hookz/web';

const MyComponent = () => {
  const [width, height] = useWindowSize();
  return <div>Window size: {width}x{height}</div>;
};

Both libraries offer similar functionality for common use cases, but react-hookz/web provides a more comprehensive set of hooks with stronger typing. beautiful-react-hooks focuses on simplicity and ease of use, making it potentially more suitable for smaller projects or developers new to React hooks. react-hookz/web, on the other hand, offers a wider range of hooks and more advanced features, making it a better choice for larger, more complex applications or developers who need more fine-grained control over their hooks.

Pros of hooks

• More comprehensive collection of hooks (50+)
• Better documentation with live demos and API references
• Actively maintained by Alibaba, with frequent updates

Cons of hooks

• Larger package size due to more hooks
• Steeper learning curve with more complex hooks
• Some hooks may be too specific for general use cases

Code Comparison

beautiful-react-hooks:

import { useWindowResize } from 'beautiful-react-hooks';

const MyComponent = () => {
  const { width, height } = useWindowResize();
  return <div>Window size: {width}x{height}</div>;
};

hooks:

import { useSize } from 'ahooks';

const MyComponent = () => {
  const size = useSize(document.body);
  return <div>Window size: {size.width}x{size.height}</div>;
};

Summary

Both beautiful-react-hooks and hooks provide useful React hooks for common tasks. beautiful-react-hooks offers a simpler, more focused set of hooks, while hooks provides a more extensive collection with better documentation and support. The choice between them depends on project requirements and developer preferences. beautiful-react-hooks may be more suitable for smaller projects or those new to custom hooks, while hooks offers more advanced functionality for larger applications.