Pros of react-use

• Larger collection of hooks (100+) covering a wide range of use cases
• More frequent updates and active maintenance
• Includes TypeScript definitions out of the box

Cons of react-use

• Larger bundle size due to the extensive collection of hooks
• Some hooks may be overly specific or complex for simple use cases
• Steeper learning curve due to the vast number of available hooks

Code Comparison

react-use:

import { useToggle, useList } from 'react-use';

const [isOn, toggleOn] = useToggle(false);
const [list, { push, filter }] = useList([1, 2, 3]);

usehooks:

import { useToggle, useArray } from 'usehooks';

const [isOn, setIsOn] = useToggle(false);
const { array, set, push, remove, filter } = useArray([1, 2, 3]);

Both libraries offer similar functionality, but react-use tends to provide more specialized hooks, while usehooks focuses on simpler, more general-purpose hooks. The code structure and naming conventions are slightly different, but the overall usage is comparable. react-use's extensive collection may be beneficial for complex projects, while usehooks might be more suitable for smaller applications or developers who prefer a more curated set of hooks.

Pros of awesome-react-hooks

• Extensive collection of React hooks from various sources
• Community-driven with contributions from multiple developers
• Categorized list for easy navigation and discovery

Cons of awesome-react-hooks

• Less curated, may include outdated or lower-quality hooks
• No standardized documentation or usage examples
• Requires more effort to evaluate and integrate hooks

Code Comparison

awesome-react-hooks (example from a linked repository):

const useWindowSize = () => {
  const [size, setSize] = useState([window.innerWidth, window.innerHeight]);
  useEffect(() => {
    const handleResize = () => setSize([window.innerWidth, window.innerHeight]);
    window.addEventListener('resize', handleResize);
    return () => window.removeEventListener('resize', handleResize);
  }, []);
  return size;
};

usehooks (example from the repository):

export function useWindowSize() {
  const [size, setSize] = useState({
    width: window.innerWidth,
    height: window.innerHeight,
  });
  useEffect(() => {
    const handler = () => setSize({
      width: window.innerWidth,
      height: window.innerHeight,
    });
    window.addEventListener('resize', handler);
    return () => window.removeEventListener('resize', handler);
  }, []);
  return size;
}

Both repositories offer valuable resources for React developers. awesome-react-hooks provides a comprehensive list of hooks from various sources, while usehooks offers a more curated selection with consistent documentation and examples. The choice between them depends on whether you prefer a wide variety of options or a more streamlined, quality-focused collection.

Pros of hooks

• More comprehensive collection of hooks (50+)
• Better documentation with live demos and API references
• Supports TypeScript out of the box

Cons of hooks

• Larger bundle size due to more hooks
• Steeper learning curve with more complex hooks
• Less focused on simplicity compared to usehooks

Code Comparison

usehooks example (useLocalStorage):

const [value, setValue] = useLocalStorage("key", "initial");

hooks example (useLocalStorageState):

const [message, setMessage] = useLocalStorageState(
  'use-local-storage-state-demo1',
  {
    defaultValue: 'Hello~',
  }
);

Both repositories provide custom React hooks, but hooks offers a more extensive collection with better documentation. usehooks focuses on simplicity and ease of use, while hooks provides more advanced functionality at the cost of increased complexity.

usehooks is ideal for developers looking for quick, simple solutions, while hooks is better suited for larger projects requiring more diverse and powerful hooks. The choice between the two depends on the specific needs of your project and your familiarity with React hooks.

Pros of react-hookz/web

• Larger collection of hooks (50+) compared to usehooks (10+)
• More frequent updates and active maintenance
• Comprehensive documentation with examples and TypeScript support

Cons of react-hookz/web

• Steeper learning curve due to the larger number of hooks
• Less focus on simplicity and ease of use for beginners
• May include hooks that are not commonly used in everyday development

Code Comparison

usehooks:

import { useLocalStorage } from 'usehooks'

const [name, setName] = useLocalStorage('name', 'Bob')

react-hookz/web:

import { useLocalStorageValue } from '@react-hookz/web'

const [name, setName] = useLocalStorageValue('name', {
  defaultValue: 'Bob'
})

Both libraries provide similar functionality for local storage hooks, but react-hookz/web offers more configuration options and a slightly different API structure.

Overall, usehooks is more suitable for beginners and simple projects, while react-hookz/web offers a wider range of hooks and more advanced features for complex applications. The choice between the two depends on the project requirements and the developer's experience level with React hooks.

Pros of beautiful-react-hooks

• More extensive collection of hooks (30+) compared to usehooks
• Includes TypeScript definitions out of the box
• Provides a playground for testing hooks directly in the browser

Cons of beautiful-react-hooks

• Less frequently updated than usehooks
• Documentation is not as detailed or well-organized
• Some hooks may be overly specific or less commonly used

Code Comparison

beautiful-react-hooks:

import { useWindowResize } from 'beautiful-react-hooks';

const MyComponent = () => {
  const { width, height } = useWindowResize();
  return <div>Window size: {width}x{height}</div>;
};

usehooks:

import { useWindowSize } from 'usehooks';

const MyComponent = () => {
  const { width, height } = useWindowSize();
  return <div>Window size: {width}x{height}</div>;
};

Both libraries offer similar functionality for common hooks, but beautiful-react-hooks tends to provide more specialized hooks for specific use cases. usehooks focuses on a smaller set of widely-used hooks with clear, concise implementations. The choice between the two may depend on the specific needs of your project and your preference for a more comprehensive library versus a more focused one.

Pros of react-hanger

• More comprehensive set of hooks, including array and object manipulation
• Actively maintained with recent updates
• Includes TypeScript support out of the box

Cons of react-hanger

• Larger bundle size due to more hooks and features
• Steeper learning curve for developers new to custom hooks
• Less focus on simplicity and ease of use

Code Comparison

react-hanger:

import { useInput, useBoolean, useNumber } from 'react-hanger';

const MyComponent = () => {
  const name = useInput('');
  const isVisible = useBoolean(false);
  const count = useNumber(0);
};

usehooks:

import { useInput, useToggle, useCounter } from 'usehooks';

const MyComponent = () => {
  const [name, setName] = useInput('');
  const [isVisible, toggleVisible] = useToggle(false);
  const [count, { increment, decrement }] = useCounter(0);
};

Both libraries provide similar functionality, but react-hanger offers a more object-oriented approach with methods attached to the returned values. usehooks, on the other hand, follows a more traditional React hooks pattern with separate state and updater functions.

react-hanger is better suited for complex applications requiring a wide range of custom hooks, while usehooks is ideal for simpler projects prioritizing ease of use and a smaller bundle size.