Pros of awesome-shell

• Broader scope, covering various shells and command-line tools
• More comprehensive, with a larger number of curated resources
• Includes sections on shell scripting frameworks and guidelines

Cons of awesome-shell

• Less focused on Bash-specific resources
• May be overwhelming for beginners due to its extensive list
• Updates less frequently than awesome-bash

Code comparison

While both repositories primarily consist of curated lists rather than code, here's a comparison of their README structures:

awesome-shell:

# Awesome Shell

- [Shells](#shells)
- [Command-Line Productivity](#command-line-productivity)
- [Customization](#customization)
- [For Developers](#for-developers)

awesome-bash:

# Awesome Bash

A curated list of delightful Bash scripts and resources.

- [Bash](#bash)
  - [Learning Resources](#learning-resources)
  - [Command-Line Productivity](#command-line-productivity)

Both repositories use similar Markdown structures, but awesome-bash focuses specifically on Bash-related content, while awesome-shell covers a broader range of shell-related topics.

Pros of awesome-zsh-plugins

• Focuses specifically on Zsh plugins, providing a more curated and specialized list
• Includes a wider variety of Zsh-specific tools and frameworks
• Regularly updated with new plugins and contributions

Cons of awesome-zsh-plugins

• Limited to Zsh, not as versatile for users of other shells
• May include some plugins that are less stable or well-maintained
• Can be overwhelming for beginners due to the large number of options

Code Comparison

awesome-bash example:

#!/bin/bash
echo "Hello, World!"

awesome-zsh-plugins example:

#!/usr/bin/env zsh
echo "Hello, World!"

The code examples are similar, with the main difference being the shebang line. Zsh offers additional features and syntax improvements over Bash, which are not apparent in this simple example but become more evident in complex scripts.

awesome-bash provides a comprehensive list of Bash resources, including tutorials, style guides, and command-line tools. It's an excellent starting point for Bash users and those looking to improve their shell scripting skills across different Unix-like systems.

awesome-zsh-plugins, on the other hand, is tailored specifically for Zsh users. It offers a vast collection of plugins that enhance the Zsh experience, including themes, completions, and productivity tools. This repository is ideal for users who have already chosen Zsh as their preferred shell and want to customize and optimize their environment.

Pros of awesome-cli-apps

• Broader scope, covering CLI apps in various programming languages
• More extensive list with a wider range of applications and tools
• Better organization with clear categories and subcategories

Cons of awesome-cli-apps

• Less focused on Bash-specific tools and resources
• May include some outdated or less maintained projects due to its broader scope
• Lacks in-depth information on Bash scripting techniques and best practices

Code comparison

While both repositories primarily consist of curated lists rather than code, here's a comparison of their README structures:

awesome-cli-apps:

# Awesome CLI Apps

- [Entertainment](#entertainment)
  - [Music](#music)
  - [Social Media](#social-media)
- [Development](#development)
  - [Version Control](#version-control)
  - [Databases](#databases)

awesome-bash:

# Awesome Bash

A curated list of delightful Bash scripts and resources.

- [Shells](#shells)
- [Command-Line Productivity](#command-line-productivity)
- [Customization](#customization)

Both repositories use similar Markdown structures for their READMEs, but awesome-cli-apps has a more detailed categorization system, while awesome-bash focuses specifically on Bash-related content.

Pros of awesome-macos-command-line

• Focused specifically on macOS command-line tools and tricks
• Includes system-specific commands and utilities not found in general Bash resources
• Organized into clear categories for easy navigation

Cons of awesome-macos-command-line

• Limited to macOS, not applicable for other Unix-like systems
• May become outdated as macOS evolves, requiring frequent updates
• Less comprehensive for general Bash scripting techniques

Code Comparison

awesome-macos-command-line example:

# Enable HiDPI display modes
sudo defaults write /Library/Preferences/com.apple.windowserver DisplayResolutionEnabled -bool true

awesome-bash example:

# Function to extract various archive formats
extract() {
    if [ -f $1 ] ; then
        case $1 in
            *.tar.bz2)   tar xjf $1     ;;
            *.tar.gz)    tar xzf $1     ;;
            *.bz2)       bunzip2 $1     ;;
            *.rar)       unrar e $1     ;;
            *.gz)        gunzip $1      ;;
            *.tar)       tar xf $1      ;;
            *.tbz2)      tar xjf $1     ;;
            *.tgz)       tar xzf $1     ;;
            *.zip)       unzip $1       ;;
            *.Z)         uncompress $1  ;;
            *.7z)        7z x $1        ;;
            *)     echo "'$1' cannot be extracted via extract()" ;;
        esac
    else
        echo "'$1' is not a valid file"
    fi
}

Pros of the-art-of-command-line

• Provides a comprehensive guide for both beginners and experienced users
• Offers practical tips and real-world examples
• Covers a wide range of command-line topics beyond just Bash

Cons of the-art-of-command-line

• Less structured organization compared to awesome-bash
• May be overwhelming for absolute beginners
• Lacks categorization of resources and tools

Code Comparison

the-art-of-command-line:

# Find files with string 'foo' and print the line number
grep -R --line-number 'foo' .

# Quickly create a directory hierarchy
mkdir -p a/long/directory/path

awesome-bash:

# Print the last 10 lines of a file
tail -n 10 file.txt

# Find the largest files in a directory
du -sh * | sort -rh | head -n 5

Both repositories offer valuable command-line resources, but they serve different purposes. the-art-of-command-line provides a more narrative-driven approach with practical tips and examples, making it suitable for users looking to improve their command-line skills. awesome-bash, on the other hand, offers a curated list of Bash-specific resources, tools, and scripts, making it ideal for those seeking a structured collection of Bash-related content.

Pros of terminals-are-sexy

• Broader scope, covering various terminal-related topics beyond just Bash
• Includes sections on terminal emulators, shells, and terminal utilities
• More visually appealing with emojis and better organization

Cons of terminals-are-sexy

• Less focused on Bash-specific resources
• May be overwhelming for beginners due to the wide range of topics covered
• Updates less frequently compared to awesome-bash

Code comparison

terminals-are-sexy:

## 🔧 Tools

- [bat](https://github.com/sharkdp/bat) - A cat(1) clone with wings.
- [exa](https://the.exa.website/) - A modern replacement for ls.
- [lsd](https://github.com/Peltoche/lsd) - The next gen ls command.

awesome-bash:

## Command-Line Productivity

- [aliases](https://github.com/sebglazebrook/aliases) - Contextual, dynamic, organized aliases for the bash shell
- [bashhub](https://github.com/rcaloras/bashhub-client) - :cloud: Bash history in the cloud. Indexed and searchable.
- [bashmarks](https://github.com/huyng/bashmarks) - Directory bookmarks for the shell

Both repositories provide curated lists of terminal-related resources, but terminals-are-sexy offers a broader scope covering various aspects of terminal usage. awesome-bash focuses specifically on Bash-related tools and resources, making it more targeted for Bash users. The code comparison shows that terminals-are-sexy includes more modern command-line tools, while awesome-bash emphasizes productivity-enhancing Bash utilities.