Pros of create-react-app

• Official React toolchain with extensive community support and regular updates
• Simplified setup process with zero configuration required
• Integrated development server with hot reloading and error reporting

Cons of create-react-app

• Less flexibility in configuration options without ejecting
• Larger bundle size due to inclusion of unnecessary dependencies
• Limited customization of build process without advanced knowledge

Code Comparison

react-starter-kit:

import React from 'react';
import { render } from 'react-dom';
import { Router, browserHistory } from 'react-router';
import routes from './routes';

render(
  <Router history={browserHistory} routes={routes} />,
  document.getElementById('root')
);

create-react-app:

import React from 'react';
import ReactDOM from 'react-dom';
import './index.css';
import App from './App';
import reportWebVitals from './reportWebVitals';

ReactDOM.render(
  <React.StrictMode>
    <App />
  </React.StrictMode>,
  document.getElementById('root')
);

The main difference in the code examples is that react-starter-kit uses React Router for routing, while create-react-app provides a simpler setup with just the main App component. create-react-app also includes additional features like web vitals reporting and strict mode by default.

Pros of React Starter Kit

• More comprehensive and feature-rich, offering a full-stack solution
• Better documentation and community support
• Regular updates and maintenance

Cons of React Starter Kit

• Steeper learning curve due to its complexity
• May include unnecessary features for smaller projects
• Requires more setup and configuration

Code Comparison

React Starter Kit:

import React from 'react';
import { graphql } from 'react-relay';
import Layout from '../../components/Layout';
import Page from '../../components/Page';

export default function Home({ data }) {
  return (
    <Layout>
      <Page {...data.page} />
    </Layout>
  );
}

React Starter Kit (bodyno):

import React from 'react'
import { Link } from 'react-router'
import { Counter } from 'components/Counter'
import classes from './HomeView.scss'

export const HomeView = () => (
  <div>
    <h4>Welcome!</h4>
    <Counter />
    <Link to='/counter'>Go to Counter</Link>
  </div>
)

The code comparison shows that React Starter Kit uses GraphQL and has a more structured approach, while the bodyno version uses a simpler component structure. React Starter Kit's code suggests a more scalable and feature-rich setup, whereas the bodyno version appears more straightforward and easier to grasp for beginners.

Pros of react-boilerplate

• More comprehensive and feature-rich, offering a wider range of tools and configurations
• Better documentation and community support, with regular updates and maintenance
• Includes advanced features like code splitting and offline-first functionality

Cons of react-boilerplate

• Steeper learning curve due to its complexity and extensive feature set
• May be overkill for smaller projects or beginners learning React
• Requires more setup and configuration time before starting development

Code Comparison

react-boilerplate:

import { createSelector } from 'reselect';
import { initialState } from './reducer';

const selectHome = state => state.home || initialState;

const makeSelectUsername = () =>
  createSelector(
    selectHome,
    homeState => homeState.username
  );

react-starter-kit:

import React from 'react';
import { connect } from 'react-redux';

const mapStateToProps = state => ({
  user: state.user
});

export default connect(mapStateToProps)(YourComponent);

The code comparison shows that react-boilerplate uses more advanced state management techniques with reselect, while react-starter-kit uses a simpler Redux connection approach.

Pros of React Slingshot

• More comprehensive documentation and setup instructions
• Includes additional features like error tracking and offline support
• Regularly maintained with frequent updates

Cons of React Slingshot

• Potentially overwhelming for beginners due to its extensive feature set
• Slightly larger initial bundle size due to additional dependencies

Code Comparison

React Slingshot:

import React from 'react';
import { render } from 'react-dom';
import { Provider } from 'react-redux';
import { Router, browserHistory } from 'react-router';
import routes from './routes';

React Starter Kit:

import React from 'react';
import ReactDOM from 'react-dom';
import { Provider } from 'react-redux';
import { Router, browserHistory } from 'react-router';
import routes from './routes';

Summary

Both React Slingshot and React Starter Kit provide solid foundations for React projects. React Slingshot offers a more feature-rich environment with comprehensive documentation, making it suitable for developers who want a robust starting point. However, this comes at the cost of a slightly steeper learning curve and larger initial bundle size.

React Starter Kit, on the other hand, provides a more minimalistic approach, which may be preferable for developers who want more control over their project structure and dependencies.

The code comparison shows that both projects use similar core dependencies and setup, with minor differences in import statements and overall structure.

Pros of react-redux-starter-kit

• Includes Redux integration out of the box, simplifying state management
• More comprehensive testing setup with Karma, Mocha, and Chai
• Better organized project structure with separate directories for routes, layouts, and components

Cons of react-redux-starter-kit

• More complex setup may be overwhelming for beginners
• Less frequently updated compared to react-starter-kit
• Heavier initial bundle size due to additional dependencies

Code Comparison

react-starter-kit:

import React from 'react'
import ReactDOM from 'react-dom'
import App from './components/App'

ReactDOM.render(<App />, document.getElementById('root'))

react-redux-starter-kit:

import React from 'react'
import ReactDOM from 'react-dom'
import createStore from './store/createStore'
import App from './components/App'

const store = createStore(window.__INITIAL_STATE__)

ReactDOM.render(
  <Provider store={store}>
    <App />
  </Provider>,
  document.getElementById('root')
)

The react-redux-starter-kit example shows the integration of Redux with the store creation and Provider wrapper, while the react-starter-kit example is simpler but lacks built-in state management.

Pros of react-redux-universal-hot-example

• More comprehensive and feature-rich, including server-side rendering and Redux integration
• Includes a wider range of technologies and tools, such as Express, Socket.io, and Helmet
• Better documentation and more detailed explanations in the README

Cons of react-redux-universal-hot-example

• More complex and potentially overwhelming for beginners
• Larger codebase with more dependencies, which may lead to longer build times
• Less frequently updated compared to react-starter-kit

Code Comparison

react-redux-universal-hot-example:

import React from 'react';
import { renderToString } from 'react-dom/server';
import { match, RouterContext } from 'react-router';
import { Provider } from 'react-redux';
import createStore from './redux/create';

react-starter-kit:

import React from 'react';
import ReactDOM from 'react-dom';
import { BrowserRouter } from 'react-router-dom';
import App from './components/App';
import './index.css';

The code comparison shows that react-redux-universal-hot-example includes more advanced features like server-side rendering and Redux integration, while react-starter-kit focuses on a simpler client-side setup.