angular-charts

Pros of Chart.js

• More comprehensive and feature-rich charting library
• Actively maintained with frequent updates and a large community
• Supports a wider range of chart types and customization options

Cons of Chart.js

• Steeper learning curve due to its extensive API and options
• Larger file size, which may impact page load times
• Not specifically designed for Angular, requiring additional setup for integration

Code Comparison

angular-charts:

$scope.data = {
  series: ['Sales', 'Income'],
  data: [
    {x: "2014", y: [100, 150]},
    {x: "2015", y: [200, 250]}
  ]
};

Chart.js:

new Chart(ctx, {
  type: 'bar',
  data: {
    labels: ['2014', '2015'],
    datasets: [
      {label: 'Sales', data: [100, 200]},
      {label: 'Income', data: [150, 250]}
    ]
  }
});

Summary

Chart.js offers a more robust and versatile charting solution with broader community support, while angular-charts provides a simpler, Angular-specific implementation. Chart.js may be preferable for complex projects requiring extensive customization, whereas angular-charts could be suitable for quick integration in Angular applications with basic charting needs.

Pros of billboard.js

• More actively maintained with frequent updates and releases
• Supports a wider variety of chart types and customization options
• Better documentation and examples

Cons of billboard.js

• Steeper learning curve due to more complex API
• Larger file size, which may impact page load times

Code Comparison

billboard.js:

var chart = bb.generate({
  bindto: "#chart",
  data: {
    columns: [
      ["data1", 30, 200, 100, 400, 150, 250],
      ["data2", 50, 20, 10, 40, 15, 25]
    ]
  }
});

angular-charts:

$scope.data = {
  series: ['Sales', 'Income'],
  data: [
    {x: "Laptops", y: [100, 500]},
    {x: "Desktops", y: [300, 100]}
  ]
};

Summary

billboard.js offers more features and better maintenance, making it suitable for complex charting needs. However, angular-charts may be easier to integrate for simple Angular projects. The code comparison shows that billboard.js uses a more declarative approach, while angular-charts relies on Angular's data binding.

Pros of d3

• More powerful and flexible, allowing for complex custom visualizations
• Larger community and ecosystem, with extensive documentation and examples
• Can be used with any framework or vanilla JavaScript

Cons of d3

• Steeper learning curve due to its low-level nature
• Requires more code to create basic charts
• Less integration with Angular-specific features

Code Comparison

d3:

const svg = d3.select("body").append("svg")
    .attr("width", 400)
    .attr("height", 300);

svg.selectAll("rect")
    .data(data)
    .enter().append("rect")
    .attr("x", (d, i) => i * 40)
    .attr("y", d => 300 - d * 10)
    .attr("width", 38)
    .attr("height", d => d * 10);

angular-charts:

$scope.data = {
    series: ['Sales', 'Income'],
    data: [
        {x: "2014", y: [100, 150]},
        {x: "2015", y: [120, 180]},
        {x: "2016", y: [140, 200]}
    ]
};
$scope.chartType = 'bar';

Summary

d3 offers more flexibility and power for creating custom visualizations but requires more effort to implement. angular-charts provides a simpler, more Angular-friendly approach for basic charts but with less customization options. The choice between the two depends on the complexity of the visualizations needed and the developer's familiarity with Angular and d3.

Pros of ApexCharts.js

• More comprehensive and feature-rich charting library
• Supports a wider range of chart types and customization options
• Active development with frequent updates and improvements

Cons of ApexCharts.js

• Larger file size and potentially higher performance overhead
• Steeper learning curve due to more complex API and configuration options

Code Comparison

ApexCharts.js:

var options = {
  chart: { type: 'line' },
  series: [{ data: [30, 40, 35, 50, 49, 60, 70] }],
  xaxis: { categories: [1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997] }
};
var chart = new ApexCharts(document.querySelector("#chart"), options);
chart.render();

angular-charts:

$scope.data = {
  series: ['Sales', 'Income'],
  data: [
    {x: "2014", y: [100, 50]},
    {x: "2015", y: [130, 80]}
  ]
};

Summary

ApexCharts.js offers a more comprehensive charting solution with a wider range of features and customization options. It's actively maintained and frequently updated. However, it comes with a larger file size and a steeper learning curve. angular-charts, on the other hand, provides a simpler API and integration specifically for AngularJS applications, but with fewer chart types and customization options. The choice between the two depends on the specific requirements of your project and the level of complexity you're willing to work with.

Pros of nivo

• More comprehensive and feature-rich charting library
• Supports React out of the box, with better integration
• Actively maintained with frequent updates and improvements

Cons of nivo

• Steeper learning curve due to more complex API
• Larger bundle size, which may impact performance for smaller projects
• Requires more setup and configuration compared to simpler libraries

Code Comparison

nivo example:

import { ResponsivePie } from '@nivo/pie'

const MyPieChart = ({ data }) => (
  <ResponsivePie
    data={data}
    margin={{ top: 40, right: 80, bottom: 80, left: 80 }}
    innerRadius={0.5}
    padAngle={0.7}
    cornerRadius={3}
  />
)

angular-charts example:

$scope.pieChart = {
  data: [
    { label: "A", value: 25 },
    { label: "B", value: 75 }
  ],
  options: {
    thickness: 0.2
  }
};

While both libraries provide charting capabilities, nivo offers a more modern and flexible approach with React integration. It provides more customization options but requires more setup. angular-charts is simpler to use but has limited features and is specifically designed for AngularJS applications. The code examples demonstrate the difference in syntax and configuration between the two libraries.

Pros of recharts

• Built with React, offering seamless integration with React applications
• More active development and larger community support
• Extensive documentation and examples

Cons of recharts

• Limited to React applications, not suitable for Angular projects
• Steeper learning curve for developers unfamiliar with React

Code Comparison

recharts:

import { LineChart, Line, XAxis, YAxis, CartesianGrid, Tooltip, Legend } from 'recharts';

const Chart = ({ data }) => (
  <LineChart width={600} height={300} data={data}>
    <Line type="monotone" dataKey="value" stroke="#8884d8" />
    <CartesianGrid stroke="#ccc" />
    <XAxis dataKey="name" />
    <YAxis />
    <Tooltip />
    <Legend />
  </LineChart>
);

angular-charts:

<div ac-chart="chartType" ac-data="data" ac-config="config" id='chart' class='chart'></div>

$scope.data = {
  series: ['Sales', 'Income'],
  data: [
    {x: "Laptops", y: [100, 120]},
    {x: "Desktops", y: [70, 80]}
  ]
};

Summary

recharts is a more modern and actively maintained library specifically designed for React applications, offering extensive features and documentation. However, it's limited to React ecosystems. angular-charts, while older and less actively maintained, provides a simpler integration for Angular projects but with fewer features and customization options.