cool-admin-midway

Pros of Midway

• More comprehensive and mature framework with broader ecosystem support
• Better documentation and community resources
• Stronger TypeScript integration and decorators support

Cons of Midway

• Steeper learning curve for beginners
• Less opinionated, requiring more configuration for complex setups
• May be overkill for smaller projects or simple APIs

Code Comparison

Midway:

import { Provide, Inject, Controller, Get } from '@midwayjs/decorator';

@Provide()
@Controller('/api')
export class APIController {
  @Inject()
  ctx: Context;

  @Get('/data')
  async getData() {
    return { success: true, data: 'Hello from Midway' };
  }
}

Cool Admin Midway:

import { Provide, Controller, Get } from '@cool-midway/core';

@Provide()
@Controller('/api')
export class APIController {
  @Get('/data')
  async getData() {
    return this.ok('Hello from Cool Admin Midway');
  }
}

The code comparison shows that while both frameworks use similar decorators, Cool Admin Midway provides a more streamlined approach with built-in response helpers like this.ok(). Midway offers more flexibility but requires more boilerplate code for context handling and response formatting.

Pros of Nest

• More mature and widely adopted framework with a larger community
• Extensive documentation and ecosystem of plugins/modules
• Built-in support for TypeScript and decorators

Cons of Nest

• Steeper learning curve for developers new to TypeScript or decorators
• Can be overkill for smaller projects or microservices
• Opinionated architecture may not suit all project structures

Code Comparison

Nest:

@Controller('cats')
export class CatsController {
  @Get()
  findAll(): string {
    return 'This action returns all cats';
  }
}

Cool Admin Midway:

@Provide()
@Controller('/api/admin/sys/user')
export class SysUserController {
  @Inject()
  sysUserService: SysUserService;

  @Get('/page')
  async page(@Query(ALL) query) {
    return this.sysUserService.page(query);
  }
}

Key Differences

• Nest uses a more Angular-like approach with decorators
• Cool Admin Midway is built on top of Midway.js, which is based on Egg.js
• Nest has a more modular structure, while Cool Admin Midway focuses on admin panel functionality
• Cool Admin Midway provides more out-of-the-box features for admin systems

Conclusion

Nest is a versatile framework suitable for various applications, while Cool Admin Midway is more specialized for admin panel development. Choose based on your project requirements and team expertise.

Pros of egg

• More mature and established framework with a larger community
• Extensive plugin ecosystem for easy extensibility
• Built-in security features and best practices

Cons of egg

• Steeper learning curve for beginners
• Less opinionated, requiring more configuration
• May be overkill for smaller projects

Code Comparison

egg:

// app/controller/home.js
const Controller = require('egg').Controller;

class HomeController extends Controller {
  async index() {
    this.ctx.body = 'Hello World';
  }
}

cool-admin-midway:

// src/controller/home.ts
import { Provide, Controller, Get } from '@midwayjs/decorator';

@Provide()
@Controller('/')
export class HomeController {
  @Get('/')
  async home() {
    return 'Hello World';
  }
}

Both frameworks use a similar controller-based structure, but cool-admin-midway leverages TypeScript and decorators for a more modern approach. egg uses a more traditional class-based structure with less syntactic sugar.

egg is generally more flexible and customizable, while cool-admin-midway provides a more opinionated and streamlined development experience. The choice between the two depends on project requirements, team preferences, and the desired level of control over the application structure.

Pros of TypeORM

• More mature and widely adopted ORM with extensive documentation
• Supports multiple database systems, offering greater flexibility
• Active community and frequent updates

Cons of TypeORM

• Steeper learning curve for beginners
• Can be overkill for smaller projects or simple database operations
• Performance may be slower compared to raw SQL queries in some cases

Code Comparison

TypeORM:

import { Entity, PrimaryGeneratedColumn, Column } from "typeorm"

@Entity()
export class User {
    @PrimaryGeneratedColumn()
    id: number

    @Column()
    firstName: string
}

Cool Admin Midway:

import { EntityModel } from '@midwayjs/orm';
import { PrimaryGeneratedColumn, Column } from 'typeorm';

@EntityModel()
export class User {
  @PrimaryGeneratedColumn()
  id: number;

  @Column()
  firstName: string;
}

Both repositories use TypeORM as the underlying ORM, but Cool Admin Midway is built on top of the Midway framework, providing additional features and abstractions. TypeORM offers more flexibility and direct control over database operations, while Cool Admin Midway provides a more opinionated structure and additional built-in functionalities for rapid development of admin systems.

Pros of Prisma

• More mature and widely adopted ORM with extensive documentation
• Supports multiple databases (PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQLite, etc.)
• Type-safe database access with auto-generated TypeScript types

Cons of Prisma

• Steeper learning curve for developers new to ORM concepts
• Less flexibility in complex database operations compared to raw SQL
• Requires additional setup and configuration for each project

Code Comparison

Prisma schema definition:

model User {
  id    Int     @id @default(autoincrement())
  email String  @unique
  name  String?
  posts Post[]
}

Cool Admin Midway entity definition:

@EntityModel('user')
export class User extends BaseEntity {
  @PrimaryGeneratedColumn()
  id: number;

  @Column({ unique: true })
  email: string;

  @Column({ nullable: true })
  name: string;
}

Both projects aim to simplify database operations, but Prisma offers a more comprehensive ORM solution with broader database support. Cool Admin Midway, on the other hand, provides a full-stack admin panel solution built on Midway.js, which may be more suitable for rapid development of admin interfaces. The choice between the two depends on the specific project requirements and the developer's familiarity with the respective ecosystems.

Pros of Feathers

• More mature and widely adopted framework with a larger community
• Supports real-time functionality out of the box
• Flexible and modular architecture allowing for easy customization

Cons of Feathers

• Steeper learning curve for developers new to its concepts
• Less opinionated, which may require more setup and configuration
• Limited built-in admin interface compared to Cool Admin Midway

Code Comparison

Feathers service creation:

const feathers = require('@feathersjs/feathers');
const app = feathers();

app.use('messages', {
  async find() {
    return [{ id: 1, text: 'Hello' }];
  }
});

Cool Admin Midway controller:

import { Provide, Controller, Get } from '@midwayjs/decorator';

@Provide()
@Controller('/api/user')
export class UserController {
  @Get('/')
  async getUser() {
    return { id: 1, name: 'John' };
  }
}

Both frameworks offer different approaches to creating services or controllers. Feathers focuses on a service-based architecture, while Cool Admin Midway uses a more traditional controller-based approach with decorators.