Pros of hamburgers

• Offers a wide variety of hamburger animations (26 types)
• Provides CSS and Sass versions for flexibility
• Includes customization options for colors, sizes, and animations

Cons of hamburgers

• Requires more setup and configuration
• Larger file size due to multiple animation options
• May require additional CSS knowledge for customization

Code Comparison

hamburgers (CSS):

.hamburger {
  padding: 15px;
  display: inline-block;
  cursor: pointer;
  transition-property: opacity, filter;
  transition-duration: 0.15s;
  transition-timing-function: linear;
  font: inherit;
  color: inherit;
  text-transform: none;
  background-color: transparent;
  border: 0;
  margin: 0;
  overflow: visible;
}

hamburger-react (JSX):

import Hamburger from 'hamburger-react'

function App() {
  const [isOpen, setOpen] = useState(false)
  return <Hamburger toggled={isOpen} toggle={setOpen} />
}

hamburgers provides more customization options and animation varieties but requires more setup. hamburger-react offers a simpler, React-specific implementation with fewer options but easier integration. The code comparison shows the CSS-based approach of hamburgers versus the component-based approach of hamburger-react.

Pros of react-burger-menu

• More customizable with various menu styles and animations
• Includes built-in accessibility features
• Offers more comprehensive documentation and examples

Cons of react-burger-menu

• Larger bundle size due to additional features
• Steeper learning curve for basic implementation
• Less frequently updated compared to hamburger-react

Code Comparison

react-burger-menu:

import { slide as Menu } from 'react-burger-menu'

<Menu>
  <a id="home" className="menu-item" href="/">Home</a>
  <a id="about" className="menu-item" href="/about">About</a>
  <a id="contact" className="menu-item" href="/contact">Contact</a>
</Menu>

hamburger-react:

import Hamburger from 'hamburger-react'

const [isOpen, setOpen] = useState(false)

<Hamburger toggled={isOpen} toggle={setOpen} />

Summary

react-burger-menu offers more features and customization options, making it suitable for complex menu requirements. However, it comes with a larger bundle size and steeper learning curve. hamburger-react, on the other hand, provides a simpler and more lightweight solution for basic hamburger menu functionality, with a focus on easy implementation and smaller bundle size. The choice between the two depends on the specific needs of the project, balancing between feature richness and simplicity.

Pros of react-boilerplate

• Comprehensive and feature-rich, offering a complete setup for large-scale React applications
• Includes built-in state management, routing, and internationalization
• Provides a scalable project structure with best practices for React development

Cons of react-boilerplate

• Steeper learning curve due to its complexity and numerous features
• May be overkill for smaller projects or simple applications
• Requires more setup time and configuration compared to lightweight alternatives

Code Comparison

react-boilerplate:

import React from 'react';
import { Helmet } from 'react-helmet';
import styled from 'styled-components';
import { Switch, Route } from 'react-router-dom';

import HomePage from 'containers/HomePage/Loadable';

hamburger-react:

import React from 'react'
import Hamburger from 'hamburger-react'

const App = () => {
  const [isOpen, setOpen] = useState(false)
  return <Hamburger toggled={isOpen} toggle={setOpen} />
}

react-boilerplate is a comprehensive solution for building large-scale React applications, offering a robust set of features and best practices. However, it may be excessive for simpler projects. hamburger-react, on the other hand, is a lightweight and focused library specifically for creating hamburger menu icons, making it easier to implement but with a narrower scope.

Pros of react-bootstrap

• Comprehensive UI component library with a wide range of pre-built components
• Extensive documentation and community support
• Seamless integration with Bootstrap's CSS framework

Cons of react-bootstrap

• Larger bundle size due to its extensive component library
• Steeper learning curve for developers unfamiliar with Bootstrap
• Less flexibility for custom styling compared to more lightweight alternatives

Code Comparison

hamburger-react:

import Hamburger from 'hamburger-react'

const Menu = () => {
  const [isOpen, setOpen] = useState(false)
  return <Hamburger toggled={isOpen} toggle={setOpen} />
}

react-bootstrap:

import { Navbar, Nav } from 'react-bootstrap'

const Menu = () => (
  <Navbar expand="lg">
    <Navbar.Toggle aria-controls="basic-navbar-nav" />
    <Navbar.Collapse id="basic-navbar-nav">
      <Nav className="mr-auto">
        <Nav.Link href="#home">Home</Nav.Link>
        <Nav.Link href="#about">About</Nav.Link>
      </Nav>
    </Navbar.Collapse>
  </Navbar>
)

Summary

hamburger-react is a lightweight, focused library for creating hamburger menu icons, while react-bootstrap is a comprehensive UI component library. hamburger-react offers simplicity and ease of use for specific menu functionality, whereas react-bootstrap provides a full suite of components but with added complexity and larger bundle size.

Pros of react-modal

• More comprehensive and feature-rich, offering a complete modal solution
• Highly customizable with various options for styling and behavior
• Well-established project with a large community and extensive documentation

Cons of react-modal

• Larger bundle size due to its comprehensive nature
• Steeper learning curve for basic implementations
• May require more setup and configuration for simple use cases

Code Comparison

react-modal:

import Modal from 'react-modal';

<Modal
  isOpen={modalIsOpen}
  onRequestClose={closeModal}
  contentLabel="Example Modal"
>
  <h2>Modal Content</h2>
  <button onClick={closeModal}>Close</button>
</Modal>

hamburger-react:

import Hamburger from 'hamburger-react'

<Hamburger toggled={isOpen} toggle={setOpen} />

Summary

react-modal is a more comprehensive solution for creating modals in React applications, offering extensive customization options and a robust feature set. However, it comes with a larger bundle size and potentially more complex setup for basic use cases.

hamburger-react, on the other hand, is a lightweight and focused component specifically for creating hamburger menu icons. It's simpler to implement but lacks the broader functionality of a full modal system.

The choice between these libraries depends on the specific needs of your project. If you require a full-featured modal system, react-modal is the better choice. For a simple hamburger menu icon, hamburger-react offers a more streamlined solution.