Pros of styled-components

• More mature ecosystem with extensive documentation and community support
• Better TypeScript integration out of the box
• Native mobile support through React Native

Cons of styled-components

• Slightly larger bundle size
• Slower runtime performance in some scenarios
• Less flexible API for advanced use cases

Code Comparison

styled-components:

const Button = styled.button`
  background-color: ${props => props.primary ? 'blue' : 'white'};
  color: ${props => props.primary ? 'white' : 'blue'};
  padding: 10px 20px;
`;

emotion:

const Button = styled.button`
  background-color: ${props => props.primary ? 'blue' : 'white'};
  color: ${props => props.primary ? 'white' : 'blue'};
  padding: 10px 20px;
`;

Both libraries offer similar syntax for creating styled components, with minor differences in advanced features and performance optimizations. emotion provides more flexibility in configuration and usage patterns, while styled-components offers a more opinionated approach with stronger ecosystem support. The choice between the two often comes down to specific project requirements and personal preference.

Pros of CSS Modules

• Simpler learning curve for developers familiar with traditional CSS
• Better separation of concerns between styles and JavaScript
• Works well with existing CSS tooling and preprocessors

Cons of CSS Modules

• Requires additional build configuration and tooling
• Limited runtime manipulation of styles
• Less flexibility for dynamic styling based on props or state

Code Comparison

CSS Modules:

/* styles.module.css */
.button {
  background-color: blue;
  color: white;
}

import styles from './styles.module.css';

const Button = () => <button className={styles.button}>Click me</button>;

Emotion:

import { css } from '@emotion/react';

const buttonStyle = css`
  background-color: blue;
  color: white;
`;

const Button = () => <button css={buttonStyle}>Click me</button>;

Both CSS Modules and Emotion offer solutions for scoped CSS in React applications. CSS Modules provides a more traditional CSS approach with automatic scoping, while Emotion offers a more flexible, JavaScript-centric styling solution with runtime capabilities. The choice between them often depends on project requirements, team preferences, and the need for dynamic styling.

Pros of JSS

• More flexible and customizable, allowing for dynamic styles and plugins
• Better performance for large-scale applications due to its optimized runtime
• Supports server-side rendering out of the box

Cons of JSS

• Steeper learning curve, especially for developers new to CSS-in-JS
• Requires more setup and configuration compared to Emotion
• Less intuitive syntax for simple styling tasks

Code Comparison

Emotion:

import { css } from '@emotion/react'

const style = css`
  color: hotpink;
  font-size: 24px;
`

const Component = () => <div css={style}>Hello, World!</div>

JSS:

import { createUseStyles } from 'react-jss'

const useStyles = createUseStyles({
  myStyle: {
    color: 'hotpink',
    fontSize: 24
  }
})

const Component = () => {
  const classes = useStyles()
  return <div className={classes.myStyle}>Hello, World!</div>
}

Both Emotion and JSS are popular CSS-in-JS libraries, each with its own strengths. Emotion offers a more straightforward API and is easier to adopt, while JSS provides more advanced features and better performance for complex applications. The choice between them often depends on project requirements and team preferences.

Pros of Linaria

• Zero runtime, CSS is extracted at build time
• Works with server-side rendering out of the box
• Supports CSS preprocessing with PostCSS

Cons of Linaria

• Requires additional build configuration
• Limited dynamic styling capabilities compared to Emotion
• Smaller ecosystem and community support

Code Comparison

Emotion:

import { css } from '@emotion/react'

const style = css`
  color: hotpink;
`

const SomeComponent = ({ children }) => (
  <div css={style}>{children}</div>
)

Linaria:

import { styled } from '@linaria/react'

const StyledDiv = styled.div`
  color: hotpink;
`

const SomeComponent = ({ children }) => (
  <StyledDiv>{children}</StyledDiv>
)

Both Emotion and Linaria are CSS-in-JS libraries, but they have different approaches. Emotion focuses on runtime styling with a larger ecosystem, while Linaria emphasizes zero-runtime CSS extraction. Emotion offers more flexibility for dynamic styling, whereas Linaria provides better performance due to its build-time CSS generation. The choice between the two depends on project requirements, with Emotion being more suitable for highly dynamic styles and Linaria excelling in static styling scenarios with a focus on performance.