helloworld

Pros of lede

• Actively maintained with frequent updates and bug fixes
• Supports a wide range of hardware, including older devices
• Provides a comprehensive set of features and customization options

Cons of lede

• Larger codebase and more complex to set up compared to HelloWorld
• May have a steeper learning curve for new users
• Potential compatibility issues with some hardware configurations

Code Comparison

HelloWorld:

console.log('Hello, World!');

lede:

#include <stdio.h>

int main() {
    printf("Hello, World!\n");
    return 0;
}

Pros of immortalwrt

• Actively maintained and updated with the latest features and security patches
• Supports a wide range of hardware and devices, including older and less powerful models
• Provides a comprehensive set of packages and utilities for customizing and extending the firmware

Cons of immortalwrt

• May have a steeper learning curve for users unfamiliar with OpenWrt/LEDE
• Some features or packages may not be as up-to-date as the latest upstream versions
• Customization and configuration options can be more complex than simpler firmware alternatives

Code Comparison

Here's a brief comparison of the code structure between the two repositories:

immortalwrt:

├── feeds.conf.default
├── include
├── package
├── scripts
├── target
└── tools

fw876/helloworld:

├── LICENSE
├── README.md
├── helloworld.c
└── Makefile

The immortalwrt repository has a more complex structure, reflecting its comprehensive firmware distribution, while the fw876/helloworld repository is a simple "Hello, World!" program.

Pros of Lienol/openwrt

• Lienol/openwrt provides a more comprehensive and feature-rich OpenWRT distribution, with support for a wider range of hardware and additional packages.
• The project has a larger and more active community, with more frequent updates and bug fixes.
• Lienol/openwrt offers better support for newer hardware and technologies, such as 5G networking.

Cons of Lienol/openwrt

• The Lienol/openwrt codebase is more complex and may be more challenging for beginners to navigate and contribute to.
• The project's focus on supporting a wider range of hardware and features may result in a larger attack surface and potential security vulnerabilities.
• Lienol/openwrt may have a higher resource footprint compared to the more lightweight fw876/helloworld.

Code Comparison

Here's a brief code comparison between the two projects:

fw876/helloworld:

const http = require('http');

http.createServer((req, res) => {
  res.writeHead(200, { 'Content-Type': 'text/plain' });
  res.end('Hello, World!\n');
}).listen(8080, () => {
  console.log('Server running at http://localhost:8080/');
});

Lienol/openwrt (from the package/kernel/linux/modules/netsupport.mk file):

define KernelPackage/nf-conntrack-netlink
  TITLE:=Netfilter netlink interface
  KCONFIG:=CONFIG_NF_CT_NETLINK
  FILES:=$(LINUX_DIR)/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.ko
  AUTOLOAD:=$(call AutoLoad,40,nf_conntrack_netlink)
  DEPENDS:=+kmod-nf-conntrack
  $(call AddDepends/nf-conntrack)
endef

$(eval $(call KernelPackage,nf-conntrack-netlink))

Pros of kenzok8/openwrt-packages

• Extensive collection of packages for OpenWRT, covering a wide range of applications and utilities.
• Active community involvement and regular updates to the package repository.
• Provides a convenient way to extend the functionality of OpenWRT-based devices.

Cons of kenzok8/openwrt-packages

• May require more technical expertise to integrate and configure the packages compared to a simpler "hello world" project.
• Potential compatibility issues with specific OpenWRT versions or hardware configurations.
• Larger codebase and dependencies, which can make it more challenging to understand and maintain.

Code Comparison

HelloWorld (fw876/helloworld):

console.log('Hello, World!');

OpenWRT Packages (kenzok8/openwrt-packages):

include $(TOPDIR)/rules.mk

PKG_NAME:=luci-app-ssr-plus
PKG_VERSION:=1.101
PKG_RELEASE:=1

LUCI_TITLE:=LuCI support for SSR Plus
LUCI_PKGARCH:=all
LUCI_DEPENDS:=+shadowsocksr-libev-ssr-redir +shadowsocksr-libev-ssr-server +ipset +ip-full +iptables-mod-tproxy +dnsmasq-full +coreutils +coreutils-base64 +bash +pdnsd-alt +wget