automl

Google Brain AutoML

6,203

1,443

6,203

157

View on GitHub

Top Related Projects

nni

13,973

An open source AutoML toolkit for automate machine learning lifecycle, including feature engineering, neural architecture search, model compression and hyper-parameter tuning.

optuna

10,484

A hyperparameter optimization framework

auto-sklearn

7,536

Automated Machine Learning with scikit-learn

tpot

9,653

A Python Automated Machine Learning tool that optimizes machine learning pipelines using genetic programming.

mljar-supervised

2,999

Python package for AutoML on Tabular Data with Feature Engineering, Hyper-Parameters Tuning, Explanations and Automatic Documentation

Quick Overview

Google AutoML is a suite of machine learning tools and libraries designed to automate and simplify the process of creating high-quality machine learning models. It aims to make machine learning accessible to developers and researchers with varying levels of ML expertise, offering solutions for tasks such as image classification, object detection, and natural language processing.

Pros

Simplifies the machine learning model development process
Provides state-of-the-art performance on various ML tasks
Offers a range of pre-built models and customization options
Integrates well with other Google Cloud services

Cons

Limited flexibility compared to building custom models from scratch
Requires Google Cloud Platform account and associated costs
May have a steeper learning curve for those unfamiliar with Google Cloud
Some advanced features may require significant computational resources

Code Examples

Image classification using AutoML Vision:

from google.cloud import automl_v1beta1 as automl

client = automl.AutoMlClient()
project_id = "your-project-id"
model_id = "your-model-id"

# Load an image for prediction
with open("path/to/image.jpg", "rb") as content_file:
    content = content_file.read()

image = automl.Image(image_bytes=content)
payload = automl.ExamplePayload(image=image)

# Get predictions
response = client.predict(name=model_id, payload=payload)

for result in response.payload:
    print(f"Predicted class: {result.display_name}")
    print(f"Confidence score: {result.classification.score}")

Text classification using AutoML Natural Language:

from google.cloud import automl_v1beta1 as automl

client = automl.AutoMlClient()
project_id = "your-project-id"
model_id = "your-model-id"

# Prepare text content for prediction
content = "Your text content here"
text_snippet = automl.TextSnippet(content=content, mime_type="text/plain")
payload = automl.ExamplePayload(text_snippet=text_snippet)

# Get predictions
response = client.predict(name=model_id, payload=payload)

for result in response.payload:
    print(f"Predicted class: {result.display_name}")
    print(f"Confidence score: {result.classification.score}")

Object detection using AutoML Vision:

from google.cloud import automl_v1beta1 as automl

client = automl.AutoMlClient()
project_id = "your-project-id"
model_id = "your-model-id"

# Load an image for object detection
with open("path/to/image.jpg", "rb") as content_file:
    content = content_file.read()

image = automl.Image(image_bytes=content)
payload = automl.ExamplePayload(image=image)

# Get predictions
response = client.predict(name=model_id, payload=payload)

for result in response.payload:
    print(f"Object: {result.display_name}")
    print(f"Confidence score: {result.image_object_detection.score}")
    print(f"Bounding box: {result.image_object_detection.bounding_box}")

Getting Started

To get started with Google AutoML:

Set up a Google Cloud Platform account and create a new project.
Enable the AutoML API for your project.
Install the Google Cloud SDK and authenticate your account.
Install the required Python libraries:

pip install google-cloud-automl

Set up your credentials:

export GOOGLE_APPLICATION_CREDENTIALS="path/to/your/service-account-key.json"

Use the code examples provided above as a starting point for your specific use case.

Competitor Comparisons

nni

13,973

An open source AutoML toolkit for automate machine learning lifecycle, including feature engineering, neural architecture search, model compression and hyper-parameter tuning.

Pros of NNI

More comprehensive and flexible, supporting a wider range of ML tasks and frameworks
Offers a user-friendly web UI for experiment management and visualization
Provides more advanced hyperparameter tuning algorithms and techniques

Cons of NNI

Steeper learning curve due to its extensive features and options
May require more setup and configuration compared to AutoML's simpler approach
Less integrated with Google Cloud services for large-scale distributed training

Code Comparison

NNI:

import nni

@nni.trace
def run_trial(params):
    # Your model training code here
    return accuracy

if __name__ == '__main__':
    nni.run(run_trial)

AutoML:

from google.cloud import automl_v1beta1 as automl

client = automl.AutoMlClient()
dataset = client.create_dataset(project_location, my_dataset)
model = client.create_model(project_location, my_model)

NNI offers more flexibility in defining custom search spaces and integrating with existing code, while AutoML provides a more streamlined, cloud-based approach for specific tasks like image classification or natural language processing. NNI's code allows for fine-grained control over the optimization process, whereas AutoML abstracts away much of the complexity, making it easier to use for beginners but potentially less customizable.

optuna

10,484

A hyperparameter optimization framework

Pros of Optuna

More flexible and customizable for various optimization tasks
Supports a wider range of hyperparameter types and distributions
Active community and frequent updates

Cons of Optuna

Requires more manual configuration compared to AutoML's automated approach
May have a steeper learning curve for beginners
Less integrated with other Google Cloud services

Code Comparison

Optuna:

import optuna

def objective(trial):
    x = trial.suggest_float('x', -10, 10)
    return (x - 2) ** 2

study = optuna.create_study()
study.optimize(objective, n_trials=100)

AutoML:

from google.cloud import automl_v1beta1 as automl

client = automl.AutoMlClient()
dataset = client.create_dataset(project_path, dataset_config)
model = client.create_model(project_path, model_config)

The code snippets demonstrate the different approaches: Optuna focuses on defining an objective function and optimization process, while AutoML abstracts much of the process behind API calls for dataset and model creation.

autokeras

9,110

AutoML library for deep learning

Pros of AutoKeras

Open-source and free to use, allowing for greater community involvement and customization
Built on top of Keras, providing a familiar API for many deep learning practitioners
Supports a wide range of tasks including image classification, text classification, and structured data

Cons of AutoKeras

Less extensive documentation and support compared to AutoML
May have fewer advanced features and optimizations than Google's offering
Potentially slower search process for optimal models

Code Comparison

AutoKeras:

import autokeras as ak

clf = ak.ImageClassifier()
clf.fit(x_train, y_train)
results = clf.predict(x_test)

AutoML:

from google.cloud import automl_v1beta1 as automl

client = automl.AutoMlClient()
model = client.create_model(parent, model)
response = client.deploy_model(model.name)

The code snippets demonstrate the simplicity of AutoKeras for image classification tasks, while AutoML requires more setup and integration with Google Cloud services. AutoKeras provides a more straightforward API for quick experimentation, whereas AutoML offers a more comprehensive cloud-based solution for production-ready models.

auto-sklearn

7,536

Automated Machine Learning with scikit-learn

Pros of auto-sklearn

Open-source and free to use
Extensive documentation and community support
Integrates well with scikit-learn ecosystem

Cons of auto-sklearn

Limited to scikit-learn algorithms and preprocessing methods
May require more manual configuration for complex tasks
Performance can be slower for large datasets

Code Comparison

AutoML:

from google.cloud import automl_v1beta1 as automl

client = automl.AutoMlClient()
project_id = "your-project-id"
dataset_id = "your-dataset-id"
model = client.create_model(project_id, dataset_id)

auto-sklearn:

import autosklearn.classification
import sklearn.model_selection
import sklearn.datasets
import sklearn.metrics

X, y = sklearn.datasets.load_digits(return_X_y=True)
X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = sklearn.model_selection.train_test_split(X, y, random_state=1)

automl = autosklearn.classification.AutoSklearnClassifier()
automl.fit(X_train, y_train)
y_pred = automl.predict(X_test)
print("Accuracy score:", sklearn.metrics.accuracy_score(y_test, y_pred))

The code examples demonstrate the basic usage of both libraries. AutoML requires cloud setup and focuses on creating a model, while auto-sklearn provides a more traditional scikit-learn-like interface for local machine learning tasks.

tpot

9,653

A Python Automated Machine Learning tool that optimizes machine learning pipelines using genetic programming.

Pros of TPOT

Open-source and free to use, allowing for greater customization and community contributions
Supports a wider range of machine learning algorithms and preprocessing methods
Provides more detailed explanations of the generated pipelines, aiding in interpretability

Cons of TPOT

Generally slower in execution compared to AutoML, especially for large datasets
Requires more manual configuration and parameter tuning
Less seamless integration with cloud services and production environments

Code Comparison

TPOT:

from tpot import TPOTClassifier
tpot = TPOTClassifier(generations=5, population_size=20, verbosity=2)
tpot.fit(X_train, y_train)
print(tpot.score(X_test, y_test))
tpot.export('tpot_pipeline.py')

AutoML:

from google.cloud import automl_v1beta1 as automl
client = automl.AutoMlClient()
project_id = 'your-project-id'
model = client.create_model(project_id, model_spec)
response = client.deploy_model(model.name)

Note: The code snippets are simplified examples and may not represent the full functionality of each library. AutoML's usage typically involves interacting with Google Cloud services, while TPOT operates locally by default.

mljar-supervised

2,999

Python package for AutoML on Tabular Data with Feature Engineering, Hyper-Parameters Tuning, Explanations and Automatic Documentation

Pros of mljar-supervised

Open-source and free to use, allowing for greater flexibility and customization
Supports a wide range of machine learning algorithms and techniques
Provides detailed explanations and interpretability for model decisions

Cons of mljar-supervised

Less extensive documentation and community support compared to AutoML
May require more manual configuration and expertise to achieve optimal results
Limited integration with cloud services and enterprise-level features

Code Comparison

mljar-supervised:

from supervised import AutoML

automl = AutoML(results_path="automl_results")
automl.fit(X, y)
predictions = automl.predict(X_test)

AutoML:

from google.cloud import automl_v1beta1 as automl

client = automl.AutoMlClient()
model = client.create_model(parent, model)
response = client.deploy_model(model.name)

The mljar-supervised code is more straightforward and can be run locally, while AutoML requires cloud integration and authentication. AutoML's code is more focused on model deployment and management, whereas mljar-supervised emphasizes the training and prediction process.

Convert designs to code with AI

Introducing Visual Copilot: A new AI model to turn Figma designs to high quality code using your components.

Try Visual Copilot

README

Brain AutoML

This repository contains a list of AutoML related models and libraries.

Top Related Projects

Convert designs to code with AI

Introducing Visual Copilot: A new AI model to turn Figma designs to high quality code using your components.

Try Visual Copilot