Pros of TanStack Table

• Framework-agnostic, supporting React, Vue, Solid, and Svelte
• More extensive feature set, including virtualization and advanced sorting
• Larger community and ecosystem, with more plugins and extensions

Cons of TanStack Table

• Steeper learning curve due to its flexibility and complexity
• Requires more setup and configuration for basic use cases
• Less opinionated styling, potentially requiring more custom CSS

Code Comparison

Mantine Datatable:

import { DataTable } from 'mantine-datatable';

<DataTable
  columns={[{ accessor: 'name' }, { accessor: 'age' }]}
  records={[{ name: 'John', age: 30 }, { name: 'Jane', age: 25 }]}
/>

TanStack Table:

import { useReactTable, getCoreRowModel, flexRender } from '@tanstack/react-table';

const table = useReactTable({
  data: [{ name: 'John', age: 30 }, { name: 'Jane', age: 25 }],
  columns: [{ accessorKey: 'name' }, { accessorKey: 'age' }],
  getCoreRowModel: getCoreRowModel(),
});

Summary

Mantine Datatable offers a simpler, more opinionated approach with built-in Mantine styling, while TanStack Table provides greater flexibility and features at the cost of increased complexity. Choose based on your project's specific needs and your team's familiarity with each library.

Pros of Material-UI

• Extensive component library with a wide range of UI elements
• Large community and ecosystem, providing extensive documentation and third-party extensions
• Highly customizable theming system with built-in support for dark mode

Cons of Material-UI

• Steeper learning curve due to its comprehensive nature
• Larger bundle size, which may impact initial load times
• More opinionated design system, which may require more effort to deviate from the Material Design guidelines

Code Comparison

Material-UI:

import { DataGrid } from '@mui/x-data-grid';

const columns = [
  { field: 'id', headerName: 'ID', width: 70 },
  { field: 'firstName', headerName: 'First name', width: 130 },
];

<DataGrid rows={rows} columns={columns} pageSize={5} checkboxSelection />

Mantine-datatable:

import { DataTable } from 'mantine-datatable';

const columns = [
  { accessor: 'id', title: 'ID', width: 70 },
  { accessor: 'firstName', title: 'First name', width: 130 },
];

<DataTable records={records} columns={columns} />

Both libraries offer data table components, but Material-UI's DataGrid provides more built-in features like pagination and row selection out of the box, while Mantine-datatable focuses on simplicity and ease of use.

Pros of ag-grid

• More feature-rich with advanced functionalities like pivoting, grouping, and aggregation
• Supports multiple frameworks (React, Angular, Vue) and vanilla JavaScript
• Extensive documentation and community support

Cons of ag-grid

• Steeper learning curve due to its complexity
• Larger bundle size, which may impact performance for smaller projects
• Commercial license required for some advanced features

Code Comparison

mantine-datatable:

<DataTable
  columns={[
    { accessor: 'name', width: 200 },
    { accessor: 'age', width: 80 },
  ]}
  records={data}
/>

ag-grid:

<AgGridReact
  columnDefs={[
    { field: 'name', width: 200 },
    { field: 'age', width: 80 },
  ]}
  rowData={data}
/>

Summary

ag-grid offers a more comprehensive set of features and wider framework support, making it suitable for complex enterprise applications. However, it comes with a steeper learning curve and potential licensing costs. mantine-datatable, while less feature-rich, provides a simpler API and is more lightweight, making it ideal for smaller projects or those already using the Mantine UI library. The code comparison shows that both libraries have similar basic usage, but ag-grid's API can become more complex as advanced features are utilized.

Pros of react-bootstrap-table2

• More mature and established project with a larger community
• Extensive documentation and examples available
• Built-in support for Bootstrap styling

Cons of react-bootstrap-table2

• Less frequent updates and maintenance
• Heavier bundle size due to Bootstrap dependency
• More complex API for advanced features

Code Comparison

mantine-datatable:

<DataTable
  columns={[
    { accessor: 'name', width: 200 },
    { accessor: 'age', width: 80 },
  ]}
  records={data}
/>

react-bootstrap-table2:

<BootstrapTable
  keyField='id'
  data={data}
  columns={[
    { dataField: 'name', text: 'Name' },
    { dataField: 'age', text: 'Age' },
  ]}
/>

Both libraries offer similar basic functionality, but mantine-datatable has a more concise API. react-bootstrap-table2 requires specifying a keyField and uses dataField instead of accessor. The text property in react-bootstrap-table2 is used for column headers, while mantine-datatable infers it from the accessor.

mantine-datatable provides a more modern and lightweight approach, focusing on essential features and customization. react-bootstrap-table2 offers a wider range of built-in functionalities but comes with a steeper learning curve and larger bundle size.

Pros of react-data-grid

• More mature and battle-tested, with a larger community and longer development history
• Offers more advanced features out-of-the-box, such as cell editing and custom cell renderers
• Better performance for handling large datasets with virtualization

Cons of react-data-grid

• Steeper learning curve due to its extensive API and configuration options
• Less modern styling and theming capabilities compared to mantine-datatable
• Requires more boilerplate code to set up basic functionality

Code Comparison

react-data-grid:

import ReactDataGrid from 'react-data-grid';

const columns = [
  { key: 'id', name: 'ID' },
  { key: 'name', name: 'Name' }
];

const rows = [
  { id: 1, name: 'John' },
  { id: 2, name: 'Jane' }
];

<ReactDataGrid columns={columns} rows={rows} />

mantine-datatable:

import { DataTable } from 'mantine-datatable';

const records = [
  { id: 1, name: 'John' },
  { id: 2, name: 'Jane' }
];

<DataTable
  columns={[
    { accessor: 'id', title: 'ID' },
    { accessor: 'name', title: 'Name' }
  ]}
  records={records}
/>

Both libraries offer powerful data grid components, but react-data-grid is more feature-rich and performant for complex use cases, while mantine-datatable provides a more modern and user-friendly approach with easier integration into Mantine-based projects.

Pros of mui-datatables

• More mature and widely adopted, with a larger community and ecosystem
• Offers a wider range of built-in features and customization options
• Better documentation and examples available

Cons of mui-datatables

• Heavier bundle size due to more features and dependencies
• Steeper learning curve for complex customizations
• Less flexible for custom styling and layout modifications

Code Comparison

mantine-datatable:

<DataTable
  columns={[
    { accessor: 'name', width: 200 },
    { accessor: 'age', textAlignment: 'right' },
    { accessor: 'email' },
  ]}
  records={data}
/>

mui-datatables:

<MUIDataTable
  title={"Employee List"}
  data={data}
  columns={[
    { name: "name", label: "Name" },
    { name: "age", label: "Age" },
    { name: "email", label: "Email" },
  ]}
  options={options}
/>

Both libraries offer similar basic functionality for creating data tables, but mui-datatables provides more built-in options and customization out of the box. mantine-datatable has a simpler API and is more lightweight, making it easier to get started with for basic use cases. The choice between the two depends on the specific project requirements, desired features, and the developer's familiarity with the respective UI libraries (Mantine vs Material-UI).