Pros of android-mvvm-architecture

• Implements a clean MVVM architecture pattern
• Includes comprehensive unit and integration tests
• Provides a solid foundation for building scalable Android apps

Cons of android-mvvm-architecture

• May have a steeper learning curve for beginners
• Could be considered over-engineered for simple projects
• Requires more initial setup time compared to simpler architectures

Code Comparison

android-mvvm-architecture:

class MainViewModel @Inject constructor(
    private val userRepository: UserRepository,
    private val networkHelper: NetworkHelper
) : ViewModel() {
    private val _users = MutableLiveData<Resource<List<User>>>()
    val users: LiveData<Resource<List<User>>> = _users
}

Both repositories appear to be the same project, so there isn't a meaningful code comparison to be made between them. The repository showcases a well-structured MVVM architecture implementation for Android, including dependency injection, repository pattern, and the use of LiveData for reactive programming.

The project demonstrates best practices for building maintainable and testable Android applications, making it a valuable resource for developers looking to implement MVVM architecture in their projects.

Pros of Android-CleanArchitecture

• Implements a more comprehensive Clean Architecture approach, promoting better separation of concerns
• Provides a more scalable and maintainable codebase structure for large projects
• Includes detailed unit tests and integration tests, demonstrating better test coverage

Cons of Android-CleanArchitecture

• Steeper learning curve due to its more complex architecture
• May be overkill for smaller projects or simpler applications
• Less focus on specific Android components and libraries compared to android-mvvm-architecture

Code Comparison

Android-CleanArchitecture:

class GetUserList @Inject constructor(
    private val userRepository: UserRepository
) : UseCase<List<User>, Void?>() {
    override suspend fun run(params: Void?) = userRepository.users()
}

android-mvvm-architecture:

class UserRepository @Inject constructor(
    private val apiHelper: ApiHelper,
    private val dbHelper: DatabaseHelper
) {
    suspend fun getUsers(): Resource<List<User>> {
        return ResponseHandler.handleSuccess(apiHelper.getUsers())
    }
}

The Android-CleanArchitecture example showcases a use case implementation, emphasizing the separation of business logic from data sources. The android-mvvm-architecture example demonstrates a more direct approach to data retrieval within the repository layer.

Pros of architecture-samples

• Official Google sample, ensuring best practices and up-to-date implementations
• Covers multiple architectural approaches (MVC, MVP, MVVM)
• Extensive documentation and explanations for each architectural pattern

Cons of architecture-samples

• May be overwhelming for beginners due to multiple architectural examples
• Less focused on a single, opinionated implementation
• Lacks some real-world scenarios and complex use cases

Code Comparison

architecture-samples (MVVM):

class TasksViewModel(
    private val tasksRepository: TasksRepository
) : ViewModel() {
    private val _items = MutableLiveData<List<Task>>().apply { value = emptyList() }
    val items: LiveData<List<Task>> = _items
}

android-mvvm-architecture:

class MainViewModel(
    private val appDataManager: AppDataManager,
    private val schedulerProvider: SchedulerProvider
) : BaseViewModel<MainNavigator>(appDataManager, schedulerProvider) {
    private val blogListLiveData: MutableLiveData<List<BlogResponse.Blog>> = MutableLiveData()
    fun getBlogListLiveData(): LiveData<List<BlogResponse.Blog>> = blogListLiveData
}

Both repositories demonstrate MVVM architecture, but android-mvvm-architecture includes additional components like AppDataManager and SchedulerProvider, offering a more opinionated and structured approach. architecture-samples focuses on simplicity and clarity in its examples.

Pros of architecture-samples

• Official Google sample, ensuring best practices and up-to-date implementations
• Covers multiple architectural approaches (MVC, MVP, MVVM)
• Extensive documentation and explanations for each architectural pattern

Cons of architecture-samples

• May be overwhelming for beginners due to multiple architectural examples
• Less focused on a single, opinionated implementation
• Lacks some real-world scenarios and complex use cases

Code Comparison

architecture-samples (MVVM):

class TasksViewModel(
    private val tasksRepository: TasksRepository
) : ViewModel() {
    private val _items = MutableLiveData<List<Task>>().apply { value = emptyList() }
    val items: LiveData<List<Task>> = _items
}

android-mvvm-architecture:

class MainViewModel(
    private val appDataManager: AppDataManager,
    private val schedulerProvider: SchedulerProvider
) : BaseViewModel<MainNavigator>(appDataManager, schedulerProvider) {
    private val blogListLiveData: MutableLiveData<List<BlogResponse.Blog>> = MutableLiveData()
    fun getBlogListLiveData(): LiveData<List<BlogResponse.Blog>> = blogListLiveData
}

Both repositories demonstrate MVVM architecture, but android-mvvm-architecture includes additional components like AppDataManager and SchedulerProvider, offering a more opinionated and structured approach. architecture-samples focuses on simplicity and clarity in its examples.

Pros of android-clean-architecture-boilerplate

• Implements a more comprehensive Clean Architecture approach
• Utilizes Kotlin coroutines for asynchronous programming
• Includes a robust testing setup with example unit and integration tests

Cons of android-clean-architecture-boilerplate

• More complex project structure, which may be overwhelming for beginners
• Requires a deeper understanding of Clean Architecture principles
• Less focus on MVVM specifically, as it encompasses a broader architectural approach

Code Comparison

android-clean-architecture-boilerplate:

class GetBufferoos @Inject constructor(
    private val bufferooRepository: BufferooRepository,
    private val postExecutionThread: PostExecutionThread
) : UseCase<List<Bufferoo>, Void?>(postExecutionThread) {

    public override fun buildUseCaseObservable(params: Void?): Observable<List<Bufferoo>> {
        return bufferooRepository.getBufferoos()
    }
}

android-mvvm-architecture:

public class LoginViewModel extends ViewModel {
    private final LoginUseCase loginUseCase;
    private final MutableLiveData<LoginResponse> loginLiveData = new MutableLiveData<>();

    @Inject
    public LoginViewModel(LoginUseCase loginUseCase) {
        this.loginUseCase = loginUseCase;
    }
}

The android-clean-architecture-boilerplate example showcases a use case implementation using Kotlin and RxJava, while the android-mvvm-architecture example demonstrates a ViewModel class in Java with LiveData. The former focuses on Clean Architecture principles, while the latter emphasizes MVVM patterns.