Pros of nvd3

• More versatile and can be used with various frameworks, not limited to Angular
• Larger community and more frequent updates
• Offers a wider range of chart types and customization options

Cons of nvd3

• Steeper learning curve for beginners
• Requires more setup and configuration compared to angular-nvd3
• Less seamless integration with Angular-specific features

Code Comparison

nvd3:

nv.addGraph(function() {
  var chart = nv.models.lineChart();
  d3.select('#chart svg')
    .datum(data)
    .call(chart);
  return chart;
});

angular-nvd3:

$scope.options = {
  chart: { type: 'lineChart' }
};
$scope.data = [/* ... */];

Summary

nvd3 is a more flexible and powerful charting library that can be used across different frameworks, while angular-nvd3 provides a simpler, Angular-specific implementation. nvd3 offers more customization options but requires more setup, whereas angular-nvd3 integrates more seamlessly with Angular projects at the cost of some versatility.

Pros of Chart.js

• Lightweight and fast, with a smaller file size
• Extensive documentation and active community support
• Built-in responsiveness and mobile-friendly design

Cons of Chart.js

• Limited to canvas-based rendering, which may affect customization options
• Fewer advanced chart types compared to NVD3

Code Comparison

Chart.js:

var ctx = document.getElementById('myChart').getContext('2d');
var chart = new Chart(ctx, {
    type: 'bar',
    data: {
        labels: ['Red', 'Blue', 'Yellow', 'Green', 'Purple', 'Orange'],
        datasets: [{
            label: '# of Votes',
            data: [12, 19, 3, 5, 2, 3]
        }]
    }
});

angular-nvd3:

$scope.options = {
    chart: {
        type: 'discreteBarChart',
        height: 450,
        x: function(d){ return d.label; },
        y: function(d){ return d.value; }
    }
};
$scope.data = [
    {key: "Cumulative Return", values: [
        { "label" : "A" , "value" : -29.765957771107 },
        { "label" : "B" , "value" : 0 }
    ]}
];

Both libraries offer easy-to-use APIs for creating charts, but Chart.js has a more straightforward setup process. angular-nvd3 requires more configuration but provides greater flexibility for complex visualizations.

Pros of d3

• More flexible and powerful, allowing for complex custom visualizations
• Larger community and ecosystem with extensive documentation and examples
• Can be used with any framework or vanilla JavaScript

Cons of d3

• Steeper learning curve and more complex API
• Requires more code to create basic charts and graphs
• Less integration with Angular-specific features and lifecycle

Code Comparison

d3:

const svg = d3.select("body").append("svg")
    .attr("width", 960)
    .attr("height", 500);

svg.selectAll("circle")
    .data(data)
    .enter().append("circle")
    .attr("cx", d => d.x)
    .attr("cy", d => d.y)
    .attr("r", 5);

angular-nvd3:

$scope.options = {
    chart: {
        type: 'discreteBarChart',
        height: 450
    }
};
$scope.data = [{
    key: "Cumulative Return",
    values: [
        { "label": "A", "value": -29.765957771107 },
        { "label": "B", "value": 0 }
    ]
}];

The d3 code demonstrates direct manipulation of SVG elements, while angular-nvd3 uses a declarative approach with configuration objects. d3 offers more control but requires more code, while angular-nvd3 simplifies chart creation at the cost of flexibility.

Pros of nivo

• Built with React, offering better integration with modern React applications
• Provides a wider variety of chart types and customization options
• Offers server-side rendering capabilities for improved performance

Cons of nivo

• Steeper learning curve due to more complex API and configuration options
• Larger bundle size, which may impact initial load times for web applications

Code Comparison

nivo example:

import { ResponsivePie } from '@nivo/pie'

const MyPieChart = ({ data }) => (
  <ResponsivePie
    data={data}
    margin={{ top: 40, right: 80, bottom: 80, left: 80 }}
    innerRadius={0.5}
    padAngle={0.7}
    cornerRadius={3}
  />
)

angular-nvd3 example:

<nvd3 options="options" data="data"></nvd3>

$scope.options = {
  chart: {
    type: 'pieChart',
    height: 500,
    x: function(d) { return d.key; },
    y: function(d) { return d.y; }
  }
};

Both libraries offer powerful charting capabilities, but nivo is more modern and React-focused, while angular-nvd3 is tailored for AngularJS applications. nivo provides more flexibility and chart types, but may require more setup and configuration. angular-nvd3 is simpler to use but has fewer customization options and is tied to older AngularJS versions.

Pros of recharts

• Built specifically for React, offering seamless integration and better performance
• More active development and larger community support
• Extensive documentation and examples

Cons of recharts

• Limited to React applications, less versatile than angular-nvd3
• Steeper learning curve for developers not familiar with React

Code Comparison

angular-nvd3:

angular.module('myApp', ['nvd3'])
  .controller('myCtrl', function($scope){
    $scope.options = { /* chart options */ };
    $scope.data = [{ /* chart data */ }];
  });

recharts:

import { LineChart, Line } from 'recharts';

const MyChart = () => (
  <LineChart data={data}>
    <Line type="monotone" dataKey="value" stroke="#8884d8" />
  </LineChart>
);

Key Differences

• angular-nvd3 is designed for AngularJS, while recharts is built for React
• recharts uses a more declarative approach, typical of React components
• angular-nvd3 relies on D3.js, while recharts is a pure React implementation

Use Cases

• Choose angular-nvd3 for AngularJS projects or when working with existing D3.js charts
• Opt for recharts in React applications or when seeking a more modern, performant charting library

Community and Support

recharts has a larger and more active community, with more frequent updates and contributions. angular-nvd3, while still maintained, has less frequent updates and a smaller user base.