marp

Pros of Reveal.js

• More customizable with extensive theming options and plugins
• Supports interactive elements like fragments and transitions
• Larger community and ecosystem with numerous third-party extensions

Cons of Reveal.js

• Steeper learning curve, especially for non-developers
• Requires more manual setup and configuration
• Less focused on Markdown-centric workflow

Code Comparison

Marp (Markdown):

---
marp: true
theme: default
---

# Slide 1
Content for slide 1

---

# Slide 2
Content for slide 2

Reveal.js (HTML):

<div class="reveal">
  <div class="slides">
    <section>
      <h1>Slide 1</h1>
      <p>Content for slide 1</p>
    </section>
    <section>
      <h1>Slide 2</h1>
      <p>Content for slide 2</p>
    </section>
  </div>
</div>

Summary

Marp focuses on simplicity and Markdown-based presentations, while Reveal.js offers more advanced features and customization options. Marp is easier to use for those familiar with Markdown, while Reveal.js provides greater flexibility for complex presentations and interactive elements. The choice between the two depends on the user's needs, technical expertise, and desired level of customization.

Pros of Remark

• More flexible and customizable, allowing for greater control over slide design
• Supports a wider range of Markdown syntax and features
• Has a larger ecosystem of plugins and extensions

Cons of Remark

• Steeper learning curve, especially for users new to Markdown-based presentations
• Requires more setup and configuration to achieve desired results
• Less intuitive for users accustomed to traditional presentation software

Code Comparison

Marp:

---
marp: true
theme: default
---

# Slide 1
Content for slide 1

---

# Slide 2
Content for slide 2

Remark:

class: center, middle

# Slide 1
Content for slide 1

---

# Slide 2
Content for slide 2

Summary

Marp focuses on simplicity and ease of use, making it ideal for quick presentations with minimal setup. It uses a straightforward Markdown syntax and provides built-in themes.

Remark offers more power and flexibility, allowing for advanced customization and complex layouts. It supports a broader range of Markdown features and has a rich ecosystem of plugins, but requires more time to master.

Choose Marp for quick, simple presentations or if you're new to Markdown-based slides. Opt for Remark if you need more control over design and functionality, and are comfortable with a steeper learning curve.

Pros of reveal-md

• More customizable themes and plugins
• Built-in live reload server for development
• Supports speaker notes and PDF export

Cons of reveal-md

• Steeper learning curve for advanced features
• Less focus on Markdown-centric authoring
• Requires more configuration for complex presentations

Code Comparison

reveal-md:

---
title: My Presentation
theme: black
---

# Slide 1

- Point 1
- Point 2

---

# Slide 2

Some content

Marp:

---
marp: true
theme: default
---

# Slide 1

- Point 1
- Point 2

---

# Slide 2

Some content

Key Differences

• Marp focuses on simplicity and Markdown-first authoring
• reveal-md offers more advanced features and customization options
• Marp has better integration with VS Code and other development environments
• reveal-md provides a more traditional presentation framework with additional bells and whistles

Use Cases

• Choose Marp for quick, simple presentations with minimal setup
• Opt for reveal-md when you need more advanced features and customization options

Community and Support

• Both projects have active communities and regular updates
• Marp has a larger user base and more comprehensive documentation
• reveal-md offers more third-party themes and plugins due to its reveal.js foundation

Pros of mdx-deck

• Allows for more customization and flexibility in slide design
• Supports React components for interactive presentations
• Offers a wider range of themes and styling options

Cons of mdx-deck

• Steeper learning curve, especially for those unfamiliar with React
• Requires more setup and configuration compared to Marp
• May have slower rendering times for complex presentations

Code Comparison

mdx-deck:

import { Head, Notes } from 'mdx-deck'

<Head>
  <title>My Presentation</title>
</Head>

# Welcome to my deck

<Notes>Speaker notes go here</Notes>

Marp:

---
marp: true
title: My Presentation
---

# Welcome to my deck

<!-- Speaker notes go here -->

Both tools allow for creating presentations using Markdown, but mdx-deck offers more advanced features through React integration, while Marp focuses on simplicity and ease of use. mdx-deck is better suited for developers comfortable with React and those seeking highly customizable presentations. Marp is ideal for users who prefer a straightforward, Markdown-centric approach with minimal configuration.

Pros of impress.js

• Highly customizable and interactive presentations with 3D transformations
• Supports a wide range of CSS3 transitions and animations
• Large community and extensive plugin ecosystem

Cons of impress.js

• Steeper learning curve, especially for non-developers
• Requires more manual coding and setup compared to Marp
• May not be suitable for quick, content-focused presentations

Code Comparison

impress.js:

<div id="impress">
    <div class="step" data-x="0" data-y="0">Slide 1</div>
    <div class="step" data-x="1000" data-y="500" data-scale="2">Slide 2</div>
</div>

Marp:

---
marp: true
---

# Slide 1

---

# Slide 2

Key Differences

• impress.js focuses on creating visually stunning, interactive presentations with complex layouts and transitions
• Marp emphasizes simplicity and ease of use, using Markdown for content creation
• impress.js requires HTML and CSS knowledge, while Marp uses a more accessible Markdown syntax
• impress.js offers more granular control over slide positioning and transitions, whereas Marp provides a more streamlined, content-first approach

Both tools have their strengths, with impress.js excelling in creating unique, visually impressive presentations, and Marp offering a simpler, faster way to create clean, professional slides.