Pros of Electron Forge

• More comprehensive toolset for Electron app development, including packaging and distribution
• Better integration with native Electron APIs and features
• Actively maintained by the Electron team, ensuring compatibility with the latest Electron versions

Cons of Electron Forge

• Steeper learning curve for developers new to Electron
• Less opinionated about frontend framework choice, which may require more setup for Angular projects

Code Comparison

Angular Electron:

import { app, BrowserWindow } from 'electron';
import * as path from 'path';
import * as url from 'url';

let win: BrowserWindow = null;
const args = process.argv.slice(1),
  serve = args.some(val => val === '--serve');

Electron Forge:

const { app, BrowserWindow } = require('electron');
const path = require('path');

const createWindow = () => {
  const mainWindow = new BrowserWindow({
    width: 800,
    height: 600,
    webPreferences: {
      preload: path.join(__dirname, 'preload.js')
    }
  });

Both repositories provide boilerplate code for creating Electron applications, but Angular Electron is specifically tailored for Angular projects, while Electron Forge offers a more flexible approach that can be adapted to various frontend frameworks.

Pros of electron-quick-start

• Simpler and more lightweight, ideal for beginners or small projects
• Focuses solely on Electron, making it easier to understand core concepts
• Faster setup and quicker to get a basic app running

Cons of electron-quick-start

• Lacks built-in Angular integration, requiring more setup for Angular projects
• Doesn't include advanced features or optimizations out of the box
• Limited scaffolding and project structure guidance

Code Comparison

electron-quick-start:

const { app, BrowserWindow } = require('electron')

function createWindow () {
  const win = new BrowserWindow({ width: 800, height: 600 })
  win.loadFile('index.html')
}

app.whenReady().then(createWindow)

angular-electron:

import { app, BrowserWindow, screen } from 'electron';
import * as path from 'path';
import * as fs from 'fs';

let win: BrowserWindow | null = null;
const args = process.argv.slice(1),
  serve = args.some(val => val === '--serve');

function createWindow(): BrowserWindow {
  const size = screen.getPrimaryDisplay().workAreaSize;

The electron-quick-start repository provides a minimal Electron setup, while angular-electron offers a more comprehensive boilerplate with Angular integration and additional features for larger-scale applications.

Pros of electron-vue

• Uses Vue.js, which is known for its simplicity and ease of learning
• Includes Vuex for state management out of the box
• Offers a more opinionated structure, which can lead to faster development

Cons of electron-vue

• Less active maintenance compared to angular-electron
• Smaller community and ecosystem than Angular
• May require more manual configuration for advanced features

Code Comparison

electron-vue:

import Vue from 'vue'
import App from './App.vue'

new Vue({
  render: h => h(App)
}).$mount('#app')

angular-electron:

import { platformBrowserDynamic } from '@angular/platform-browser-dynamic';
import { AppModule } from './app/app.module';

platformBrowserDynamic().bootstrapModule(AppModule)
  .catch(err => console.error(err));

Both repositories provide boilerplate code for creating Electron applications with popular front-end frameworks. angular-electron uses Angular, which has a steeper learning curve but offers more built-in features and a larger ecosystem. electron-vue, on the other hand, leverages Vue.js, which is known for its simplicity and flexibility.

angular-electron tends to have more frequent updates and a larger community, which can be beneficial for long-term support and troubleshooting. However, electron-vue's simpler structure may be preferable for smaller projects or developers who prefer Vue.js.

The code comparison shows the entry point for both projects, highlighting the different syntax and setup required for each framework. Angular's approach is more verbose but provides stronger typing and dependency injection out of the box.

Pros of vue-cli-plugin-electron-builder

• Seamless integration with Vue CLI, allowing easy setup and configuration
• Supports both Electron Builder and Electron Packager out of the box
• Provides hot reloading for both main and renderer processes

Cons of vue-cli-plugin-electron-builder

• Limited to Vue.js projects, whereas angular-electron supports Angular
• May require additional configuration for complex Electron setups
• Less comprehensive documentation compared to angular-electron

Code Comparison

vue-cli-plugin-electron-builder:

module.exports = {
  pluginOptions: {
    electronBuilder: {
      builderOptions: {
        // Configure electron-builder options here
      }
    }
  }
}

angular-electron:

@NgModule({
  declarations: [AppComponent],
  imports: [BrowserModule, AppRoutingModule],
  providers: [],
  bootstrap: [AppComponent]
})
export class AppModule { }

The code snippets demonstrate the configuration approach for each project. vue-cli-plugin-electron-builder uses a Vue CLI plugin configuration file, while angular-electron follows the standard Angular module structure.

Both projects aim to simplify Electron development with their respective frameworks. vue-cli-plugin-electron-builder excels in Vue.js integration and ease of use, while angular-electron provides a more comprehensive boilerplate for Angular-based Electron applications. The choice between them largely depends on the preferred framework and specific project requirements.

Pros of electron-react-boilerplate

• More active community with frequent updates and contributions
• Comprehensive testing setup with Jest and React Testing Library
• Includes hot reloading for faster development

Cons of electron-react-boilerplate

• Larger bundle size due to additional features and dependencies
• Steeper learning curve for developers new to React or Electron

Code Comparison

electron-react-boilerplate:

import { MemoryRouter as Router, Routes, Route } from 'react-router-dom';
import './App.css';

export default function App() {
  return (
    <Router>
      <Routes>
        <Route path="/" element={<Hello />} />
      </Routes>
    </Router>
  );
}

angular-electron:

import { Component } from '@angular/core';

@Component({
  selector: 'app-root',
  templateUrl: './app.component.html',
  styleUrls: ['./app.component.scss']
})
export class AppComponent {
  title = 'Angular Electron';
}

The code comparison shows the different approaches to routing and component structure between React and Angular in these Electron boilerplates. electron-react-boilerplate uses React Router for navigation, while angular-electron relies on Angular's built-in routing system (not shown in this snippet).

Both boilerplates provide a solid foundation for building Electron applications with their respective frameworks. The choice between them largely depends on your preference for React or Angular, as well as the specific requirements of your project.

Pros of electron-boilerplate

• Simpler setup and structure, making it easier for beginners to get started
• More lightweight and flexible, allowing for easier customization
• Uses vanilla JavaScript, which may be preferred by some developers

Cons of electron-boilerplate

• Lacks built-in Angular integration, requiring more setup for Angular projects
• Fewer out-of-the-box features compared to angular-electron
• May require more manual configuration for complex applications

Code Comparison

electron-boilerplate:

import { app, BrowserWindow } from "electron";
import * as path from "path";

const createWindow = () => {
  const win = new BrowserWindow({
    width: 800,
    height: 600,
  });
  win.loadFile("index.html");
};

angular-electron:

import { app, BrowserWindow, screen } from 'electron';
import * as path from 'path';
import * as fs from 'fs';

let win: BrowserWindow | null = null;
const args = process.argv.slice(1),
  serve = args.some(val => val === '--serve');

function createWindow(): BrowserWindow {
  const size = screen.getPrimaryDisplay().workAreaSize;

Both repositories provide boilerplate code for Electron applications, but angular-electron is specifically tailored for Angular integration, while electron-boilerplate offers a more general-purpose setup. The choice between the two depends on the project requirements and the developer's preference for Angular or vanilla JavaScript.