Pros of TanStack Table

• More flexible and framework-agnostic, supporting React, Vue, Solid, and Svelte
• Offers advanced features like virtualization and infinite scrolling out-of-the-box
• Highly customizable with a modular plugin system

Cons of TanStack Table

• Steeper learning curve due to its more complex API
• Requires more setup and configuration for basic use cases
• Less opinionated styling, which may require more work for consistent design

Code Comparison

Material Table:

import MaterialTable from 'material-table'

<MaterialTable
  columns={[
    { title: 'Name', field: 'name' },
    { title: 'Age', field: 'age', type: 'numeric' }
  ]}
  data={[
    { name: 'John', age: 30 },
    { name: 'Jane', age: 25 }
  ]}
/>

TanStack Table:

import { useTable } from '@tanstack/react-table'

const { getTableProps, getTableBodyProps, headerGroups, rows, prepareRow } = useTable({
  columns: [{ Header: 'Name', accessor: 'name' }, { Header: 'Age', accessor: 'age' }],
  data: [{ name: 'John', age: 30 }, { name: 'Jane', age: 25 }]
})

Pros of ag-grid

• More feature-rich with advanced functionality like pivoting, grouping, and filtering
• Better performance for large datasets, handling millions of rows efficiently
• Extensive documentation and enterprise-level support options

Cons of ag-grid

• Steeper learning curve due to its complexity and extensive API
• Licensing costs for enterprise features, while material-table is fully open-source
• Heavier bundle size, which may impact initial load times

Code Comparison

material-table:

<MaterialTable
  columns={[
    { title: 'Name', field: 'name' },
    { title: 'Age', field: 'age', type: 'numeric' }
  ]}
  data={[
    { name: 'John', age: 30 },
    { name: 'Jane', age: 25 }
  ]}
/>

ag-grid:

<AgGridReact
  columnDefs={[
    { headerName: 'Name', field: 'name' },
    { headerName: 'Age', field: 'age', type: 'numericColumn' }
  ]}
  rowData={[
    { name: 'John', age: 30 },
    { name: 'Jane', age: 25 }
  ]}
/>

Both libraries offer React components for creating data grids, but ag-grid provides more customization options and advanced features at the cost of increased complexity.

Pros of Material-UI

• Comprehensive UI component library with a wide range of components beyond tables
• Highly customizable with theming and styling options
• Large and active community with frequent updates and improvements

Cons of Material-UI

• Steeper learning curve due to its extensive API and features
• Larger bundle size, which may impact performance in smaller projects
• Not specifically optimized for table functionality like Material-Table

Code Comparison

Material-UI Table:

import { Table, TableBody, TableCell, TableContainer, TableHead, TableRow, Paper } from '@mui/material';

<TableContainer component={Paper}>
  <Table>
    <TableHead>
      <TableRow>
        <TableCell>Name</TableCell>
        <TableCell>Age</TableCell>
      </TableRow>
    </TableHead>
    <TableBody>
      {rows.map((row) => (
        <TableRow key={row.name}>
          <TableCell>{row.name}</TableCell>
          <TableCell>{row.age}</TableCell>
        </TableRow>
      ))}
    </TableBody>
  </Table>
</TableContainer>

Material-Table:

import MaterialTable from 'material-table';

<MaterialTable
  columns={[
    { title: 'Name', field: 'name' },
    { title: 'Age', field: 'age', type: 'numeric' }
  ]}
  data={[
    { name: 'John', age: 30 },
    { name: 'Jane', age: 25 }
  ]}
  title="User Data"
/>

Pros of Handsontable

• More feature-rich with advanced spreadsheet-like functionality
• Supports multiple frameworks (React, Angular, Vue) and vanilla JavaScript
• Extensive documentation and examples

Cons of Handsontable

• Steeper learning curve due to its complexity
• Commercial license required for some features
• Larger bundle size

Code Comparison

Handsontable:

const hot = new Handsontable(container, {
  data: data,
  rowHeaders: true,
  colHeaders: true,
  filters: true,
  dropdownMenu: true
});

Material-table:

<MaterialTable
  columns={[
    { title: 'Name', field: 'name' },
    { title: 'Age', field: 'age', type: 'numeric' }
  ]}
  data={data}
  options={{
    filtering: true,
    sorting: true
  }}
/>

Summary

Handsontable offers more advanced spreadsheet-like features and supports multiple frameworks, making it suitable for complex data manipulation tasks. However, it comes with a steeper learning curve and potential licensing costs. Material-table, on the other hand, is more straightforward to use and integrate, especially for React projects, but may lack some of the advanced features found in Handsontable.

Pros of react-virtualized

• Highly performant for rendering large lists and tabular data
• Flexible and customizable, with support for various layouts (grid, list, table)
• Offers windowing techniques to efficiently render only visible items

Cons of react-virtualized

• Steeper learning curve due to its more complex API
• Requires more manual setup and configuration compared to material-table
• Less out-of-the-box styling and theming options

Code Comparison

material-table:

<MaterialTable
  columns={[
    { title: 'Name', field: 'name' },
    { title: 'Age', field: 'age', type: 'numeric' }
  ]}
  data={[
    { name: 'John', age: 30 },
    { name: 'Jane', age: 25 }
  ]}
/>

react-virtualized:

<List
  width={300}
  height={300}
  rowCount={1000}
  rowHeight={20}
  rowRenderer={({ key, index, style }) => (
    <div key={key} style={style}>
      Row {index}
    </div>
  )}
/>

Pros of react-bootstrap-table2

• Lightweight and focused on bootstrap styling
• Extensive documentation and examples
• Easy integration with existing Bootstrap projects

Cons of react-bootstrap-table2

• Less feature-rich compared to material-table
• Limited built-in styling options
• Requires separate installation of Bootstrap

Code Comparison

react-bootstrap-table2:

import BootstrapTable from 'react-bootstrap-table-next';

const columns = [{
  dataField: 'id',
  text: 'Product ID'
}, {
  dataField: 'name',
  text: 'Product Name'
}];

<BootstrapTable keyField='id' data={ products } columns={ columns } />

material-table:

import MaterialTable from 'material-table';

<MaterialTable
  columns={[
    { title: 'Name', field: 'name' },
    { title: 'Surname', field: 'surname' }
  ]}
  data={[{ name: 'Mehmet', surname: 'Baran' }]}
  title="Demo Title"
/>

Both libraries offer easy-to-use table components, but material-table provides more built-in features and styling options out of the box. react-bootstrap-table2 is more lightweight and integrates well with existing Bootstrap projects, while material-table offers a more comprehensive solution with Material-UI styling.