Pros of Material Design Icons

• Larger icon set with over 2,000 icons in various styles
• Comprehensive documentation and guidelines for usage
• Widely adopted and recognized design system

Cons of Material Design Icons

• Less frequent updates compared to Fluent UI System Icons
• Heavier file sizes due to the extensive collection
• May not align perfectly with non-Google design languages

Code Comparison

Material Design Icons:

<link href="https://fonts.googleapis.com/icon?family=Material+Icons" rel="stylesheet">
<i class="material-icons">favorite</i>

Fluent UI System Icons:

<link href="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/@fluentui/svg-icons/fonts.css" rel="stylesheet">
<i class="ms-Icon ms-Icon--Heart" aria-hidden="true"></i>

Both repositories offer easy integration into web projects, but Material Design Icons uses a more straightforward class naming convention. Fluent UI System Icons requires an additional CSS class (ms-Icon) and uses a different naming pattern for icons.

Overall, Material Design Icons provides a more extensive collection with established design principles, while Fluent UI System Icons offers a fresh, modern look with more frequent updates. The choice between the two depends on the specific project requirements and design preferences.

Pros of Feather

• Simpler, minimalist design aesthetic
• Larger community and wider adoption
• More flexible licensing (MIT)

Cons of Feather

• Fewer icons available (287 vs. 2000+ in Fluent UI)
• Less consistency with Microsoft's design language
• Limited customization options compared to Fluent UI

Code Comparison

Feather:

<i data-feather="circle"></i>
<script>
  feather.replace()
</script>

Fluent UI System Icons:

<img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/microsoft/fluentui-system-icons/master/assets/Circle/SVG/ic_fluent_circle_24_regular.svg" alt="Circle Icon">

Both icon sets are easy to implement, but Feather offers a more streamlined approach with its JavaScript library. Fluent UI System Icons requires direct use of SVG files, which can be more flexible but may require additional steps for implementation.

Feather is ideal for projects seeking a clean, minimalist look and broad compatibility. Fluent UI System Icons is better suited for applications aiming to align with Microsoft's design language or requiring a vast array of icons. The choice between the two depends on the specific needs of the project, design preferences, and integration requirements.

Pros of Ionicons

• Larger icon set with over 1,200 icons compared to Fluent UI's ~1,000
• Supports multiple file formats (SVG, WebFont, PNG, PDF)
• Includes a custom icon creation tool (Ionicons App)

Cons of Ionicons

• Less frequent updates compared to Fluent UI's regular releases
• Fewer style variations for each icon (e.g., filled, outlined, sharp)
• Limited integration with specific design systems or frameworks

Code Comparison

Ionicons usage:

<ion-icon name="heart"></ion-icon>

Fluent UI System Icons usage:

import { Heart24Regular } from '@fluentui/react-icons';

<Heart24Regular />

Both libraries offer simple implementation, but Fluent UI's approach provides more specific size and style options directly in the import statement.

Summary

Ionicons offers a larger, more diverse icon set with multiple file format support and a custom icon creation tool. However, Fluent UI System Icons provides more frequent updates, consistent style variations, and tighter integration with Microsoft's design system. The choice between the two depends on specific project requirements, design preferences, and framework compatibility.

Pros of Font-Awesome

• Larger icon set with over 2,000 icons, offering more variety
• Well-established and widely recognized in the web development community
• Supports both web fonts and SVG icons, providing flexibility in implementation

Cons of Font-Awesome

• Larger file size, which may impact page load times
• Some advanced features and icons require a paid subscription
• Less focused on a specific design system, potentially leading to inconsistency

Code Comparison

Font-Awesome (using web fonts):

<link rel="stylesheet" href="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/font-awesome/5.15.3/css/all.min.css">
<i class="fas fa-user"></i>

Fluent UI System Icons:

<img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/microsoft/fluentui-system-icons/master/assets/Person/SVG/ic_fluent_person_24_regular.svg" alt="Person icon">

Font-Awesome offers a simpler implementation using CSS classes, while Fluent UI System Icons requires direct use of SVG files. Font-Awesome's approach may be more convenient for some developers, but Fluent UI's method provides more control over the icon's appearance and size.

Pros of Icons

• Larger icon set with over 1,800 icons compared to Fluent UI's ~1,000
• More widely adopted and recognized in the web development community
• Includes additional tools like icon font generation and SVG sprite creation

Cons of Icons

• Less consistent visual style across icons compared to Fluent UI's cohesive design language
• Fewer size variations and less granular customization options
• Limited to web-focused icons, while Fluent UI covers a broader range of platforms

Code Comparison

Fluent UI System Icons usage:

import { IconName } from '@fluentui/react-icons';

<IconName />

Icons usage:

<svg class="bi" width="32" height="32" fill="currentColor">
  <use xlink:href="bootstrap-icons.svg#icon-name"/>
</svg>

Both libraries offer simple implementation, but Fluent UI provides a more React-friendly approach with direct component imports, while Icons relies on SVG syntax and external sprite files.

Pros of Tabler Icons

• Larger icon set with over 3,400 icons compared to Fluent UI's 2,000+
• More frequent updates and active community contributions
• Supports multiple file formats including SVG, React components, and web font

Cons of Tabler Icons

• Less consistent design language across icons compared to Fluent UI's cohesive style
• Fewer customization options for icon styles and colors
• Limited official documentation and usage guidelines

Code Comparison

Tabler Icons (React):

import { IconHome } from '@tabler/icons-react';

function App() {
  return <IconHome size={24} color="blue" />;
}

Fluent UI System Icons (React):

import { Home24Regular } from '@fluentui/react-icons';

function App() {
  return <Home24Regular primaryFill="blue" />;
}

Both libraries offer easy-to-use React components, but Fluent UI provides more specific naming conventions for icon sizes and styles. Tabler Icons uses a more generic approach with customizable size props.