Convert Figma logo to code with AI

ogham logoexa

A modern replacement for ‘ls’.

23,530
660
23,530
256

Top Related Projects

13,142

The next gen ls command

4,874

A Ruby gem that beautifies the terminal's ls command, with color and font-awesome icons. :tada:

10,947

A modern alternative to ls

1,524

An opinionated Lua code formatter

Quick Overview

Exa is a modern replacement for the traditional Unix ls command. It provides a more colorful, detailed, and user-friendly output for listing directory contents, with additional features like Git integration and extended file attributes.

Pros

  • Colorful and visually appealing output, making it easier to distinguish file types and permissions
  • Git integration, showing file statuses in repositories
  • Extended file information, including file sizes with units and timestamps
  • Customizable output with various view options and sorting capabilities

Cons

  • Slower than the traditional ls command for very large directories
  • Requires installation and may not be available on all systems by default
  • Some users may find the default output too verbose or cluttered
  • Learning curve for users accustomed to traditional ls options and flags

Getting Started

To install exa on macOS using Homebrew:

brew install exa

For Ubuntu or Debian-based systems:

sudo apt update
sudo apt install exa

After installation, you can start using exa by replacing ls commands with exa. For example:

exa                     # List files in the current directory
exa -l                  # List files in long format
exa -la                 # List all files (including hidden) in long format
exa --tree              # Display files in a tree structure
exa -l --git            # Show Git status for files in a Git repository

For more advanced usage and customization options, refer to the exa documentation or run exa --help for a list of available flags and options.

Competitor Comparisons

13,142

The next gen ls command

Pros of lsd

  • More active development and maintenance
  • Supports more icon themes and customization options
  • Better performance for large directories

Cons of lsd

  • Fewer command-line options and flags
  • Less extensive documentation
  • Slightly larger binary size

Code Comparison

Both projects are written in Rust and share similar structures. Here's a brief comparison of their main entry points:

exa

fn main() {
    let args = Args::parse();
    let options = Options::from(&args);
    let output = Output::create(&options);
    let filter = Filter::from(&args);
    let dir_options = DirOptions::from(&args);
    // ...
}

lsd

fn main() {
    let matches = cli::build_app().get_matches();
    let config = Config::from_matches(&matches);
    let mut stdout = StandardStream::stdout(config.color_mode);
    let mut stderr = StandardStream::stderr(config.color_mode);
    // ...
}

Both projects use command-line argument parsing and configuration structures, but lsd's approach appears more streamlined.

4,874

A Ruby gem that beautifies the terminal's ls command, with color and font-awesome icons. :tada:

Pros of colorls

  • Written in Ruby, making it easier for Ruby developers to contribute
  • Offers more customization options for icons and color schemes
  • Includes additional features like file/directory tagging and git status integration

Cons of colorls

  • Generally slower performance compared to exa, especially for large directories
  • Less actively maintained, with fewer recent updates
  • May require additional setup for non-Ruby users

Code Comparison

colorls:

def show_files(files, show_almost_all, sort)
  files.sort_by! { |f| f.downcase } if sort
  files.each do |f|
    @count += 1
    next if f.start_with?('.') && !show_almost_all
    print_file_info(f)
  end
end

exa:

fn print_dir_entry(entry: &DirEntry, options: &Options) -> io::Result<()> {
    let mut out = String::new();
    if options.long {
        write_long_view(entry, &mut out, options)?;
    } else {
        write_short_view(entry, &mut out, options)?;
    }
    print!("{}", out);
    Ok(())
}

Both projects aim to enhance the ls command with color and icons, but they take different approaches. exa, written in Rust, focuses on performance and UNIX-like behavior, while colorls, written in Ruby, emphasizes customization and additional features. The choice between them may depend on your specific needs and development environment preferences.

10,947

A modern alternative to ls

Pros of eza

  • Active development and maintenance, with regular updates and bug fixes
  • Expanded feature set, including additional file information and sorting options
  • Improved performance for large directories

Cons of eza

  • Potential compatibility issues with existing exa scripts or aliases
  • Learning curve for users familiar with exa's specific options and flags
  • Slightly larger binary size due to additional features

Code Comparison

exa:

pub fn print_dir(dir: &Dir, options: &Options) -> io::Result<()> {
    let mut files = Vec::new();
    for entry in dir.files() {
        files.push(entry?);
    }
    // ... (sorting and filtering logic)
}

eza:

pub fn print_dir(dir: &Dir, options: &Options) -> io::Result<()> {
    let mut files = Vec::new();
    for entry in dir.files() {
        files.push(entry?);
    }
    // ... (enhanced sorting and filtering logic)
    // ... (additional file information processing)
}

Both projects share similar core functionality, but eza includes enhancements and optimizations in its codebase. The main differences lie in the implementation details and additional features rather than fundamental structural changes.

1,524

An opinionated Lua code formatter

Pros of StyLua

  • Specialized for Lua formatting, offering more tailored options for Lua syntax
  • Actively maintained with regular updates and improvements
  • Supports configuration through .stylua.toml file for project-specific settings

Cons of StyLua

  • Limited to Lua language, while exa is a more versatile file listing tool
  • Smaller community and ecosystem compared to exa
  • Lacks some advanced features found in exa, such as file metadata display

Code Comparison

StyLua (Lua formatting):

local function example(a, b)
    return a + b
end

exa (File listing output):

drwxr-xr-x  10 user  group   320B Jun 15 10:00 Documents
.rw-r--r--   1 user  group   14KB Jun 14 09:30 README.md

Summary

StyLua is a specialized Lua formatter, while exa is a modern replacement for the ls command. They serve different purposes, with StyLua focusing on code formatting for Lua and exa providing enhanced file listing capabilities. StyLua offers more Lua-specific features, but exa has a broader application and a larger user base. The choice between them depends on the specific needs of the user - code formatting for Lua projects or improved file system navigation.

Convert Figma logo designs to code with AI

Visual Copilot

Introducing Visual Copilot: A new AI model to turn Figma designs to high quality code using your components.

Try Visual Copilot

README

exa is unmaintained, use the fork eza instead.

(This repository isn’t archived because the only person with the rights to do so is unreachable).


exa

exa is a modern replacement for ls.

README Sections: Options — Installation — Development

Unit tests Say thanks!

Screenshots of exa


exa is a modern replacement for the venerable file-listing command-line program ls that ships with Unix and Linux operating systems, giving it more features and better defaults. It uses colours to distinguish file types and metadata. It knows about symlinks, extended attributes, and Git. And it’s small, fast, and just one single binary.

By deliberately making some decisions differently, exa attempts to be a more featureful, more user-friendly version of ls. For more information, see exa’s website.


Command-line options

exa’s options are almost, but not quite, entirely unlike ls’s.

Display options

  • -1, --oneline: display one entry per line
  • -G, --grid: display entries as a grid (default)
  • -l, --long: display extended details and attributes
  • -R, --recurse: recurse into directories
  • -T, --tree: recurse into directories as a tree
  • -x, --across: sort the grid across, rather than downwards
  • -F, --classify: display type indicator by file names
  • --colo[u]r: when to use terminal colours
  • --colo[u]r-scale: highlight levels of file sizes distinctly
  • --icons: display icons
  • --no-icons: don't display icons (always overrides --icons)

Filtering options

  • -a, --all: show hidden and 'dot' files
  • -d, --list-dirs: list directories like regular files
  • -L, --level=(depth): limit the depth of recursion
  • -r, --reverse: reverse the sort order
  • -s, --sort=(field): which field to sort by
  • --group-directories-first: list directories before other files
  • -D, --only-dirs: list only directories
  • --git-ignore: ignore files mentioned in .gitignore
  • -I, --ignore-glob=(globs): glob patterns (pipe-separated) of files to ignore

Pass the --all option twice to also show the . and .. directories.

Long view options

These options are available when running with --long (-l):

  • -b, --binary: list file sizes with binary prefixes
  • -B, --bytes: list file sizes in bytes, without any prefixes
  • -g, --group: list each file’s group
  • -h, --header: add a header row to each column
  • -H, --links: list each file’s number of hard links
  • -i, --inode: list each file’s inode number
  • -m, --modified: use the modified timestamp field
  • -S, --blocks: list each file’s number of file system blocks
  • -t, --time=(field): which timestamp field to use
  • -u, --accessed: use the accessed timestamp field
  • -U, --created: use the created timestamp field
  • -@, --extended: list each file’s extended attributes and sizes
  • --changed: use the changed timestamp field
  • --git: list each file’s Git status, if tracked or ignored
  • --time-style: how to format timestamps
  • --no-permissions: suppress the permissions field
  • --octal-permissions: list each file's permission in octal format
  • --no-filesize: suppress the filesize field
  • --no-user: suppress the user field
  • --no-time: suppress the time field

Some of the options accept parameters:

  • Valid --color options are always, automatic, and never.
  • Valid sort fields are accessed, changed, created, extension, Extension, inode, modified, name, Name, size, type, and none. Fields starting with a capital letter sort uppercase before lowercase. The modified field has the aliases date, time, and newest, while its reverse has the aliases age and oldest.
  • Valid time fields are modified, changed, accessed, and created.
  • Valid time styles are default, iso, long-iso, and full-iso.

Installation

exa is available for macOS and Linux. More information on how to install exa is available on the Installation page.

Alpine Linux

On Alpine Linux, enable community repository and install the exa package.

apk add exa

Arch Linux

On Arch, install the exa package.

pacman -S exa

Android / Termux

On Android / Termux, install the exa package.

pkg install exa

Debian

On Debian, install the exa package.

apt install exa

Fedora

On Fedora, install the exa package.

dnf install exa

Gentoo

On Gentoo, install the sys-apps/exa package.

emerge sys-apps/exa

Homebrew

If you’re using Homebrew on macOS, install the exa formula.

brew install exa

MacPorts

If you're using MacPorts on macOS, install the exa port.

port install exa

Nix

On nixOS, install the exa package.

nix-env -i exa

openSUSE

On openSUSE, install the exa package.

zypper install exa

Ubuntu

On Ubuntu 20.10 (Groovy Gorilla) and later, install the exa package.

sudo apt install exa

Void Linux

On Void Linux, install the exa package.

xbps-install -S exa

Manual installation from GitHub

Compiled binary versions of exa are uploaded to GitHub when a release is made. You can install exa manually by downloading a release, extracting it, and copying the binary to a directory in your $PATH, such as /usr/local/bin.

For more information, see the Manual Installation page.

Cargo

If you already have a Rust environment set up, you can use the cargo install command:

cargo install exa

Cargo will build the exa binary and place it in $HOME/.cargo.

To build without Git support, run cargo install --no-default-features exa is also available, if the requisite dependencies are not installed.


Development Rust 1.66.1+ MIT Licence

exa is written in Rust. You will need rustc version 1.66.1 or higher. The recommended way to install Rust for development is from the official download page, using rustup.

Once Rust is installed, you can compile exa with Cargo:

cargo build
cargo test
  • The just command runner can be used to run some helpful development commands, in a manner similar to make. Run just --list to get an overview of what’s available.

  • If you are compiling a copy for yourself, be sure to run cargo build --release or just build-release to benefit from release-mode optimisations. Copy the resulting binary, which will be in the target/release directory, into a folder in your $PATH. /usr/local/bin is usually a good choice.

  • To compile and install the manual pages, you will need pandoc. The just man command will compile the Markdown into manual pages, which it will place in the target/man directory. To use them, copy them into a directory that man will read. /usr/local/share/man is usually a good choice.

  • exa depends on libgit2 for certain features. If you’re unable to compile libgit2, you can opt out of Git support by running cargo build --no-default-features.

  • If you intend to compile for musl, you will need to use the flag vendored-openssl if you want to get the Git feature working. The full command is cargo build --release --target=x86_64-unknown-linux-musl --features vendored-openssl,git.

For more information, see the Building from Source page.

Testing with Vagrant

exa uses Vagrant to configure virtual machines for testing.

Programs such as exa that are basically interfaces to the system are notoriously difficult to test. Although the internal components have unit tests, it’s impossible to do a complete end-to-end test without mandating the current user’s name, the time zone, the locale, and directory structure to test. (And yes, these tests are worth doing. I have missed an edge case on many an occasion.)

The initial attempt to solve the problem was just to create a directory of “awkward” test cases, run exa on it, and make sure it produced the correct output. But even this output would change if, say, the user’s locale formats dates in a different way. These can be mocked inside the code, but at the cost of making that code more complicated to read and understand.

An alternative solution is to fake everything: create a virtual machine with a known state and run the tests on that. This is what Vagrant does. Although it takes a while to download and set up, it gives everyone the same development environment to test for any obvious regressions.

First, initialise the VM:

host$ vagrant up

The first command downloads the virtual machine image, and then runs our provisioning script, which installs Rust and exa’s build-time dependencies, configures the environment, and generates some awkward files and folders to use as test cases. Once this is done, you can SSH in, and build and test:

host$ vagrant ssh
vm$ cd /vagrant
vm$ cargo build
vm$ ./xtests/run
All the tests passed!

Of course, the drawback of having a standard development environment is that you stop noticing bugs that occur outside of it. For this reason, Vagrant isn’t a necessary development step — it’s there if you’d like to use it, but exa still gets used and tested on other platforms. It can still be built and compiled on any target triple that it supports, VM or no VM, with cargo build and cargo test.