Convert Figma logo to code with AI

request logorequest-promise

The simplified HTTP request client 'request' with Promise support. Powered by Bluebird.

4,745
294
4,745
64

Top Related Projects

106,558

Promise based HTTP client for the browser and node.js

A light-weight module that brings the Fetch API to Node.js

14,549

🌐 Human-friendly and powerful HTTP request library for Node.js

Ajax for Node.js and browsers (JS HTTP client). Maintained for @forwardemail, @ladjs, @spamscanner, @breejs, @cabinjs, and @lassjs.

14,537

🌳 Tiny & elegant JavaScript HTTP client based on the Fetch API

Quick Overview

Request-promise is a popular HTTP client library for Node.js, built on top of the request library. It provides a simplified, Promise-based API for making HTTP requests, making it easier to work with asynchronous operations in modern JavaScript applications.

Pros

  • Simplifies HTTP requests with a Promise-based interface
  • Supports both Node.js and browser environments
  • Offers a wide range of configuration options and plugins
  • Provides easy-to-use methods for common HTTP operations (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE, etc.)

Cons

  • Deprecated and no longer maintained (as of 2020)
  • May have security vulnerabilities due to lack of updates
  • Relies on the also deprecated 'request' library
  • Alternatives like Axios or node-fetch are recommended for new projects

Code Examples

  1. Making a simple GET request:
const rp = require('request-promise');

rp('https://api.example.com/data')
  .then(response => console.log(response))
  .catch(error => console.error(error));
  1. Sending a POST request with JSON data:
const rp = require('request-promise');

const options = {
  method: 'POST',
  uri: 'https://api.example.com/users',
  body: {
    name: 'John Doe',
    email: 'john@example.com'
  },
  json: true
};

rp(options)
  .then(response => console.log(response))
  .catch(error => console.error(error));
  1. Using async/await syntax:
const rp = require('request-promise');

async function fetchData() {
  try {
    const response = await rp('https://api.example.com/data');
    console.log(response);
  } catch (error) {
    console.error(error);
  }
}

fetchData();

Getting Started

To use request-promise in your Node.js project, follow these steps:

  1. Install the package:

    npm install request request-promise
    
  2. Import and use the library in your code:

    const rp = require('request-promise');
    
    rp('https://api.example.com/data')
      .then(response => console.log(response))
      .catch(error => console.error(error));
    

Note: As request-promise is deprecated, consider using alternatives like Axios or node-fetch for new projects.

Competitor Comparisons

106,558

Promise based HTTP client for the browser and node.js

Pros of axios

  • Built-in promise support without additional dependencies
  • Automatic request and response transformations (e.g., JSON parsing)
  • Interceptors for request and response handling

Cons of axios

  • Larger bundle size compared to request
  • Less flexible configuration options for advanced use cases

Code comparison

request-promise:

const rp = require('request-promise');

rp('https://api.example.com/data')
  .then(response => console.log(response))
  .catch(error => console.error(error));

axios:

const axios = require('axios');

axios.get('https://api.example.com/data')
  .then(response => console.log(response.data))
  .catch(error => console.error(error));

Key differences

  • request-promise requires an additional package for promise support, while axios has it built-in
  • axios automatically parses JSON responses, whereas request-promise requires manual parsing
  • request-promise offers more granular control over request options, while axios provides a simpler API for common use cases

Use cases

  • request-promise: Legacy projects, complex HTTP client requirements
  • axios: Modern web applications, simplified API interactions, browser compatibility

Both libraries are popular choices for making HTTP requests in Node.js and browser environments, with axios gaining more traction in recent years due to its ease of use and built-in features.

A light-weight module that brings the Fetch API to Node.js

Pros of node-fetch

  • Lightweight and minimal API, closely matching the browser's Fetch API
  • Promise-based by default, no need for additional promise wrappers
  • Better performance due to its streamlined design

Cons of node-fetch

  • Less feature-rich compared to request-promise
  • Requires more manual work for advanced use cases (e.g., handling redirects, setting defaults)
  • No built-in cookie jar support

Code Comparison

node-fetch:

const fetch = require('node-fetch');

fetch('https://api.example.com/data')
  .then(response => response.json())
  .then(data => console.log(data))
  .catch(error => console.error('Error:', error));

request-promise:

const rp = require('request-promise');

rp({
  uri: 'https://api.example.com/data',
  json: true
})
  .then(data => console.log(data))
  .catch(error => console.error('Error:', error));

Summary

node-fetch offers a more modern, lightweight approach that closely aligns with browser APIs, making it ideal for projects prioritizing simplicity and performance. However, request-promise provides a more feature-rich experience out of the box, which can be beneficial for complex use cases. The choice between the two depends on the specific requirements of your project and your familiarity with the respective APIs.

14,549

🌐 Human-friendly and powerful HTTP request library for Node.js

Pros of Got

  • Lightweight and faster performance
  • Better TypeScript support and type definitions
  • More active development and maintenance

Cons of Got

  • Steeper learning curve for developers familiar with Request
  • Some features require additional plugins or configurations

Code Comparison

Request:

const request = require('request-promise');

request('https://api.example.com/data')
  .then(response => console.log(response))
  .catch(error => console.error(error));

Got:

const got = require('got');

(async () => {
  try {
    const response = await got('https://api.example.com/data');
    console.log(response.body);
  } catch (error) {
    console.error(error);
  }
})();

Key Differences

  • Got uses Promises by default and supports async/await syntax
  • Request-promise is a wrapper around Request, while Got is built from the ground up
  • Got has a more modern API design and better error handling
  • Request has been deprecated, while Got is actively maintained

Use Cases

  • Request/Request-promise: Legacy projects or those requiring specific plugins
  • Got: New projects, performance-critical applications, and TypeScript-based codebases

Community and Ecosystem

  • Request has a larger ecosystem of plugins and middleware
  • Got has a growing community and is gaining popularity in modern Node.js projects

Ajax for Node.js and browsers (JS HTTP client). Maintained for @forwardemail, @ladjs, @spamscanner, @breejs, @cabinjs, and @lassjs.

Pros of Superagent

  • More modern and actively maintained
  • Supports both Node.js and browser environments
  • Chainable API for improved readability

Cons of Superagent

  • Larger bundle size
  • Steeper learning curve for developers familiar with Request

Code Comparison

Request-Promise:

const rp = require('request-promise');

rp('https://api.example.com/data')
  .then(response => console.log(response))
  .catch(error => console.error(error));

Superagent:

const superagent = require('superagent');

superagent
  .get('https://api.example.com/data')
  .then(response => console.log(response.body))
  .catch(error => console.error(error));

Key Differences

  • Superagent offers a more intuitive API with method chaining
  • Request-Promise uses a simpler, more traditional Promise-based approach
  • Superagent provides built-in parsing for various response types
  • Request-Promise requires additional configuration for advanced features

Use Cases

  • Superagent: Modern web applications, isomorphic JavaScript projects
  • Request-Promise: Legacy Node.js applications, simpler HTTP requests

Community and Ecosystem

  • Superagent has a growing community and active development
  • Request-Promise has a larger existing ecosystem but is no longer maintained

Performance

  • Superagent generally offers better performance for complex requests
  • Request-Promise may have a slight edge in simple, straightforward scenarios
14,537

🌳 Tiny & elegant JavaScript HTTP client based on the Fetch API

Pros of ky

  • Smaller bundle size and lighter weight
  • Built on modern web standards (Fetch API)
  • Simpler API with a more intuitive interface

Cons of ky

  • Less extensive feature set compared to request-promise
  • Limited browser support (no IE11)
  • Fewer middleware options and plugins available

Code Comparison

ky:

import ky from 'ky';

const json = await ky.post('https://example.com', { json: { foo: true } }).json();

request-promise:

const rp = require('request-promise');

const options = {
    uri: 'https://example.com',
    method: 'POST',
    body: { foo: true },
    json: true
};

const json = await rp(options);

ky offers a more concise and modern syntax, leveraging the Fetch API and Promises. It provides a cleaner interface for common HTTP operations. request-promise, while more verbose, offers greater flexibility and a wider range of options out of the box.

ky is better suited for modern web applications and environments where browser compatibility is not a major concern. request-promise, on the other hand, provides broader support and a more extensive feature set, making it suitable for complex scenarios and legacy environments.

Convert Figma logo designs to code with AI

Visual Copilot

Introducing Visual Copilot: A new AI model to turn Figma designs to high quality code using your components.

Try Visual Copilot

README

Promises/A+ logo

Request-Promise

Gitter Build Status Coverage Status Dependency Status Known Vulnerabilities

Deprecated!

As of Feb 11th 2020, request is fully deprecated. No new changes are expected to land. In fact, none have landed for some time. This package is also deprecated because it depends on request.

Fyi, here is the reasoning of request's deprecation and a list of alternative libraries.


The simplified HTTP request client 'request' with Promise support. Powered by Bluebird.

Request and Bluebird are pretty awesome, but I found myself using the same design pattern. Request-Promise adds a Bluebird-powered .then(...) method to Request call objects. By default, http response codes other than 2xx will cause the promise to be rejected. This can be overwritten by setting options.simple = false.

Also check out the new libraries that are very similar to request-promise v4:


Migration from v3 to v4

  1. request became a peer dependency. Thus make sure that request is installed into your project as a direct dependency. (npm install --save request)
  2. Continuation Local Storage is no longer supported. However, you can get back the support by using request-promise-any.
  3. When you migrated your transform function to v3 and had to add if (!(/^2/.test('' + response.statusCode))) { return resolveWithFullResponse ? response : body; } you may now set the option transform2xxOnly = true instead.

Migration from v2 to v3

  1. The handling of the transform function got overhauled. This has two effects:

    • StatusCodeError.response is the transformed instead of the original response now. This error is thrown for non-2xx responses when options.simple is true (default). Please update your transform functions to also cover the transformation of non-2xx responses. To get the old behavior you may add if (!(/^2/.test('' + response.statusCode))) { return resolveWithFullResponse ? response : body; } to the first line of your transform functions that are used for requests with options.simple === true. However, you may prefer updating your transform functions to being able to transform 2xx as well as non-2xx responses because this decouples their implementation from the use of the simple option when doing requests.
    • If a transform operation throws an error, the request will be rejected with a TransformError. Its cause attribute contains the error thrown by the transform operation. Previously, the request was rejected directly with the error thrown by the transform operation. Wrapping it into a TransformError makes the error handling easier.
  2. Bluebird got updated from v2 to v3. This won't make a difference for most use cases. However, if you use advanced Promise chains starting with the Promise returned by Request-Promise, please check Bluebird's new features and changes.


Installation

This module is installed via npm:

npm install --save request
npm install --save request-promise

request is defined as a peer-dependency and thus has to be installed separately.

Cheat Sheet

var rp = require('request-promise');

Since request-promise wraps around request everything that works with request also works with request-promise. Also check out the request docs for more examples.

Crawl a webpage

rp('http://www.google.com')
    .then(function (htmlString) {
        // Process html...
    })
    .catch(function (err) {
        // Crawling failed...
    });

Crawl a webpage better

var cheerio = require('cheerio'); // Basically jQuery for node.js

var options = {
    uri: 'http://www.google.com',
    transform: function (body) {
        return cheerio.load(body);
    }
};

rp(options)
    .then(function ($) {
        // Process html like you would with jQuery...
    })
    .catch(function (err) {
        // Crawling failed or Cheerio choked...
    });

GET something from a JSON REST API

var options = {
    uri: 'https://api.github.com/user/repos',
    qs: {
        access_token: 'xxxxx xxxxx' // -> uri + '?access_token=xxxxx%20xxxxx'
    },
    headers: {
        'User-Agent': 'Request-Promise'
    },
    json: true // Automatically parses the JSON string in the response
};

rp(options)
    .then(function (repos) {
        console.log('User has %d repos', repos.length);
    })
    .catch(function (err) {
        // API call failed...
    });

POST data to a JSON REST API

Set option.body to your data and json: true to encode the body as JSON. See below for HTML forms.

var options = {
    method: 'POST',
    uri: 'http://api.posttestserver.com/post',
    body: {
        some: 'payload'
    },
    json: true // Automatically stringifies the body to JSON
};

rp(options)
    .then(function (parsedBody) {
        // POST succeeded...
    })
    .catch(function (err) {
        // POST failed...
    });

POST like HTML forms do

Pass your data to options.form to encode the body the same way as HTML forms do:

var options = {
    method: 'POST',
    uri: 'http://posttestserver.com/post.php',
    form: {
        // Like <input type="text" name="name">
        name: 'Josh'
    },
    headers: {
        /* 'content-type': 'application/x-www-form-urlencoded' */ // Is set automatically
    }
};

rp(options)
    .then(function (body) {
        // POST succeeded...
    })
    .catch(function (err) {
        // POST failed...
    });

If you want to include a file upload then use options.formData:

var options = {
    method: 'POST',
    uri: 'http://posttestserver.com/post.php',
    formData: {
        // Like <input type="text" name="name">
        name: 'Jenn',
        // Like <input type="file" name="file">
        file: {
            value: fs.createReadStream('test/test.jpg'),
            options: {
                filename: 'test.jpg',
                contentType: 'image/jpg'
            }
        }
    },
    headers: {
        /* 'content-type': 'multipart/form-data' */ // Is set automatically
    }
};

rp(options)
    .then(function (body) {
        // POST succeeded...
    })
    .catch(function (err) {
        // POST failed...
    });

Include a cookie

var tough = require('tough-cookie');

// Easy creation of the cookie - see tough-cookie docs for details
let cookie = new tough.Cookie({
    key: "some_key",
    value: "some_value",
    domain: 'api.mydomain.com',
    httpOnly: true,
    maxAge: 31536000
});

// Put cookie in an jar which can be used across multiple requests
var cookiejar = rp.jar();
cookiejar.setCookie(cookie, 'https://api.mydomain.com');
// ...all requests to https://api.mydomain.com will include the cookie

var options = {
    uri: 'https://api.mydomain.com/...',
    jar: cookiejar // Tells rp to include cookies in jar that match uri
};

rp(options)
    .then(function (body) {
        // Request succeeded...
    })
    .catch(function (err) {
        // Request failed...
    });

Get the full response instead of just the body

var options = {
    method: 'DELETE',
    uri: 'http://my-server/path/to/resource/1234',
    resolveWithFullResponse: true    //  <---  <---  <---  <---
};

rp(options)
    .then(function (response) {
        console.log("DELETE succeeded with status %d", response.statusCode);
    })
    .catch(function (err) {
        // Delete failed...
    });

Get a rejection only if the request failed for technical reasons

var options = {
    uri: 'http://www.google.com/this-page-does-not-exist.html',
    simple: false    //  <---  <---  <---  <---
};

rp(options)
    .then(function (body) {
        // Request succeeded but might as well be a 404
        // Usually combined with resolveWithFullResponse = true to check response.statusCode
    })
    .catch(function (err) {
        // Request failed due to technical reasons...
    });

For more options checkout the Request docs.


API in Detail

Consider Request-Promise being:

  • A Request object
    • With an identical API: require('request-promise') == require('request') so to say
    • However, STREAMING THE RESPONSE (e.g. .pipe(...)) is DISCOURAGED because Request-Promise would grow the memory footprint for large requests unnecessarily high. Use the original Request library for that. You can use both libraries in the same project.
  • Plus some methods on a request call object:
    • rp(...).then(...) or e.g. rp.post(...).then(...) which turn rp(...) and rp.post(...) into promises
    • rp(...).catch(...) or e.g. rp.del(...).catch(...) which is the same method as provided by Bluebird promises
      • Errors that the request library would pass to the callback are wrapped by request-promise and then passed to the catch handler. See code example below.
    • rp(...).finally(...) or e.g. rp.put(...).finally(...) which is the same method as provided by Bluebird promises
    • rp(...).cancel() or e.g. rp.get(...).cancel() which cancels the request
    • rp(...).promise() or e.g. rp.head(...).promise() which returns the underlying promise so you can access the full Bluebird API
  • Plus some additional options:
    • simple = true which is a boolean to set whether status codes other than 2xx should also reject the promise
    • resolveWithFullResponse = false which is a boolean to set whether the promise should be resolved with the full response or just the response body
    • transform which takes a function to transform the response into a custom value with which the promise is resolved
    • transform2xxOnly = false which is a boolean to set whether the transform function is applied to all responses or only to those with a 2xx status code

The objects returned by request calls like rp(...) or e.g. rp.post(...) are regular Promises/A+ compliant promises and can be assimilated by any compatible promise library.

The methods .then(...), .catch(...), and .finally(...) - which you can call on the request call objects - return a full-fledged Bluebird promise. That means you have the full Bluebird API available for further chaining. E.g.: rp(...).then(...).spread(...) If, however, you need a method other than .then(...), .catch(...), or .finally(...) to be FIRST in the chain, use .promise(): rp(...).promise().bind(...).then(...)

.then(onFulfilled, onRejected)

// As a Request user you would write:
var request = require('request');

request('http://google.com', function (err, response, body) {
    if (err) {
        handleError({ error: err, response: response, ... });
    } else if (!(/^2/.test('' + response.statusCode))) { // Status Codes other than 2xx
        handleError({ error: body, response: response, ... });
    } else {
        process(body);
    }
});

// As a Request-Promise user you can now write the equivalent code:
var rp = require('request-promise');

rp('http://google.com')
    .then(process, handleError);
// The same is available for all http method shortcuts:
request.post('http://example.com/api', function (err, response, body) { ... });
rp.post('http://example.com/api').then(...);

.catch(onRejected)

rp('http://google.com')
    .catch(handleError);

// ... is syntactical sugar for:

rp('http://google.com')
    .then(null, handleError);


// However, this:
rp('http://google.com')
    .then(process)
    .catch(handleError);

// ... is safer than:
rp('http://google.com')
    .then(process, handleError);

For more info on .then(process).catch(handleError) versus .then(process, handleError), see Bluebird docs on promise anti-patterns.

.finally(onFinished)

rp('http://google.com')
    .finally(function () {
	    // This is called after the request finishes either successful or not successful.
	});

.cancel()

This method cancels the request using Bluebird's cancellation feature.

When .cancel() is called:

  • the promise will neither be resolved nor rejected and
  • the request is aborted.

.promise() - For advanced use cases

In order to not pollute the Request call objects with the methods of the underlying Bluebird promise, only .then(...), .catch(...), and .finally(...) were exposed to cover most use cases. The effect is that any methods of a Bluebird promise other than .then(...), .catch(...), or .finally(...) cannot be used as the FIRST method in the promise chain:

// This works:
rp('http://google.com').then(function () { ... });
rp('http://google.com').catch(function () { ... });

// This works as well since additional methods are only used AFTER the FIRST call in the chain:
rp('http://google.com').then(function () { ... }).spread(function () { ... });
rp('http://google.com').catch(function () { ... }).error(function () { ... });

// Using additional methods as the FIRST call in the chain does not work:
// rp('http://google.com').bind(this).then(function () { ... });

// Use .promise() in these cases:
rp('http://google.com').promise().bind(this).then(function () { ... });

Fulfilled promises and the resolveWithFullResponse option

// Per default the body is passed to the fulfillment handler:
rp('http://google.com')
    .then(function (body) {
        // Process the html of the Google web page...
    });

// The resolveWithFullResponse options allows to pass the full response:
rp({ uri: 'http://google.com', resolveWithFullResponse: true })
    .then(function (response) {
        // Access response.statusCode, response.body etc.
    });

Rejected promises and the simple option

// The rejection handler is called with a reason object...
rp('http://google.com')
    .catch(function (reason) {
        // Handle failed request...
	});

// ... and would be equivalent to this Request-only implementation:
var options = { uri: 'http://google.com' };

request(options, function (err, response, body) {
    var reason;
    if (err) {
        reason = {
            cause: err,
            error: err,
            options: options,
            response: response
        };
	} else if (!(/^2/.test('' + response.statusCode))) { // Status Codes other than 2xx
        reason = {
            statusCode: response.statusCode,
            error: body,
            options: options,
            response: response
        };
    }

    if (reason) {
        // Handle failed request...
    }
});


// If you pass the simple option as false...
rp({ uri: 'http://google.com', simple: false })
    .catch(function (reason) {
        // Handle failed request...
	});

// ... the equivalent Request-only code would be:
request(options, function (err, response, body) {
    if (err) {
        var reason = {
            cause: err,
            error: err,
            options: options,
            response: response
        };
        // Handle failed request...
	}
});
// E.g. a 404 would now fulfill the promise.
// Combine it with resolveWithFullResponse = true to check the status code in the fulfillment handler.

With version 0.4 the reason objects became Error objects with identical properties to ensure backwards compatibility. These new Error types allow targeted catch blocks:

var errors = require('request-promise/errors');

rp('http://google.com')
	.catch(errors.StatusCodeError, function (reason) {
        // The server responded with a status codes other than 2xx.
        // Check reason.statusCode
	})
    .catch(errors.RequestError, function (reason) {
        // The request failed due to technical reasons.
        // reason.cause is the Error object Request would pass into a callback.
	});

The transform function

You can pass a function to options.transform to generate a custom fulfillment value when the promise gets resolved.

// Just for fun you could reverse the response body:
var options = {
	uri: 'http://google.com',
    transform: function (body, response, resolveWithFullResponse) {
        return body.split('').reverse().join('');
    }
};

rp(options)
    .then(function (reversedBody) {
        // ;D
    });


// However, you could also do something useful:
var $ = require('cheerio'); // Basically jQuery for node.js

function autoParse(body, response, resolveWithFullResponse) {
    // FIXME: The content type string could contain additional values like the charset.
    // Consider using the `content-type` library for a robust comparison.
    if (response.headers['content-type'] === 'application/json') {
        return JSON.parse(body);
    } else if (response.headers['content-type'] === 'text/html') {
        return $.load(body);
    } else {
        return body;
    }
}

options.transform = autoParse;

rp(options)
    .then(function (autoParsedBody) {
        // :)
    });


// You can go one step further and set the transform as the default:
var rpap = rp.defaults({ transform: autoParse });

rpap('http://google.com')
    .then(function (autoParsedBody) {
        // :)
    });

rpap('http://echojs.com')
    .then(function (autoParsedBody) {
        // =)
    });

The third resolveWithFullResponse parameter of the transform function is equivalent to the option passed with the request. This allows to distinguish whether just the transformed body or the whole response shall be returned by the transform function:

function reverseBody(body, response, resolveWithFullResponse) {
    response.body = response.body.split('').reverse().join('');
    return resolveWithFullResponse ? response : response.body;
}

As of Request-Promise v3 the transform function is ALWAYS executed for non-2xx responses. When options.simple is set to true (default) then non-2xx responses are rejected with a StatusCodeError. In this case the error contains the transformed response:

var options = {
	uri: 'http://the-server.com/will-return/404',
	simple: true,
    transform: function (body, response, resolveWithFullResponse) { /* ... */ }
};

rp(options)
    .catch(errors.StatusCodeError, function (reason) {
        // reason.response is the transformed response
    });

You may set options.transform2xxOnly = true to only execute the transform function for responses with a 2xx status code. For other status codes – independent of any other settings, e.g. options.simple – the transform function is not executed.

Error handling

If the transform operation fails (throws an error) the request will be rejected with a TransformError:

var errors = require('request-promise/errors');

var options = {
	uri: 'http://google.com',
    transform: function (body, response, resolveWithFullResponse) {
        throw new Error('Transform failed!');
    }
};

rp(options)
    .catch(errors.TransformError, function (reason) {
        console.log(reason.cause.message); // => Transform failed!
        // reason.response is the original response for which the transform operation failed
    });

Experimental Support for Continuation Local Storage

Continuation Local Storage is no longer supported. However, you can get back the support by using request-promise-any.

Debugging

The ways to debug the operation of Request-Promise are the same as described for Request. These are:

  1. Launch the node process like NODE_DEBUG=request node script.js (lib,request,otherlib works too).
  2. Set require('request-promise').debug = true at any time (this does the same thing as #1).
  3. Use the request-debug module to view request and response headers and bodies. Instrument Request-Promise with require('request-debug')(rp);.

Mocking Request-Promise

Usually you want to mock the whole request function which is returned by require('request-promise'). This is not possible by using a mocking library like sinon.js alone. What you need is a library that ties into the module loader and makes sure that your mock is returned whenever the tested code is calling require('request-promise'). Mockery is one of such libraries.

@florianschmidt1994 kindly shared his solution:

before(function (done) {

    var filename = "fileForResponse";
    mockery.enable({
        warnOnReplace: false,
        warnOnUnregistered: false,
        useCleanCache: true
    });

    mockery.registerMock('request-promise', function () {
        var response = fs.readFileSync(__dirname + '/data/' + filename, 'utf8');
        return Bluebird.resolve(response.trim());
    });

    done();
});

after(function (done) {
    mockery.disable();
    mockery.deregisterAll();
    done();
});

describe('custom test case', function () {
    //  Test some function/module/... which uses request-promise
    //  and it will always receive the predefined "fileForResponse" as data, e.g.:
    var rp = require('request-promise');
    rp(...).then(function(data) {
        // ➞ data is what is in fileForResponse
    });
});

Based on that you may now build a more sophisticated mock. Sinon.js may be of help as well.

Contributing

To set up your development environment:

  1. clone the repo to your desktop,
  2. in the shell cd to the main folder,
  3. hit npm install,
  4. hit npm install gulp -g if you haven't installed gulp globally yet, and
  5. run gulp dev. (Or run node ./node_modules/.bin/gulp dev if you don't want to install gulp globally.)

gulp dev watches all source files and if you save some changes it will lint the code and execute all tests. The test coverage report can be viewed from ./coverage/lcov-report/index.html.

If you want to debug a test you should use gulp test-without-coverage to run all tests without obscuring the code by the test coverage instrumentation.

Change History

  • v4.2.6 (2020-07-21)
    • Security fix: bumped request-promise-core which bumps lodash to ^4.17.19 following this advisory.
  • v4.2.5 (2019-11-03)
    • Security fix: bumped request-promise-core which bumps lodash to ^4.17.15. See vulnerabilty reports. (Thanks to @rishabh-chowdhary for reporting this in pull request #326.)
  • v4.2.4 (2019-02-14)
    • Corrected mistakenly set tough-cookie version, now ^2.3.3 (Thanks to @evocateur for pointing this out.)
    • If you installed request-promise@4.2.3 please make sure after the upgrade that request and request-promise use the same physical copy of tough-cookie.
  • v4.2.3 (2019-02-14)
    • Using stricter tough-cookie@~2.3.3 to avoid installing tough-cookie@3 which introduces breaking changes (Thanks to @aomdoa for pull request #299)
    • Security fix: bumped lodash to ^4.17.11, see vulnerabilty reports
  • v4.2.2 (2017-09-22)
    • Upgraded tough-cookie to a version without regex DoS vulnerability (Thanks to @rouanw for pull request #226)
  • v4.2.1 (2017-05-07)
  • v4.2.0 (2017-03-16)
  • v4.1.1 (2016-08-08)
    • Renamed internally used package @request/promise-core to request-promise-core because there where too many issues with the scoped package name (Thanks to @cabrinoob, @crazy4groovy, @dsandor, @KpjComp, @lorenwest, @Reisyukaku, @tehChromic, @todd for providing helpful information.)
  • v4.1.0 (2016-07-30)
  • v4.0.2 (2016-07-18)
    • Fix for using with module bundlers like Webpack and Browserify
  • v4.0.1 (2016-07-17)
    • Fixed @request/promise-core version for safer versioning
  • v4.0.0 (2016-07-15)
    • Breaking Change: request is declared as a peer dependency which has to be installed separately by the user now
    • Breaking Change: Dropped support for Continuation Local Storage since request-promise-any can be used for that now
    • Introduced the transform2xxOnly option to ease the breaking change regarding the new transform handling in v3.0.0 (Thanks to @stevage for pointing out the effect of the breaking change in issue #131)
    • Resolved issues #65 and #71 by publishing nearly identical libraries to support other Promise implementations: request-promise-native and request-promise-any (Thanks to @benjamingr, @eilgin, @gillesdemey, @hildjj, @iggycoloma, @jonathanong, @knpwrs, @MarkHerhold, @massimocode, @mikeal, @niftylettuce, @raitucarp, @sherdeadlock, @tonylukasavage, and @vgoloviznin for the valuable discussions!)
    • Relicensed this library with the ISC license
  • v3.0.0 (2016-04-16)
    • Breaking Change: Overhauled the handling of the transform function (Thanks to @Limess for explaining the need in issue #86)
    • Breaking Change: Updated bluebird to v3 (Thanks to @BrandonSmith for pull request #103)
    • Improved StatusCodeError.message
    • Updated lodash to v4.6
    • Improved README in regard to .catch(...) best practice (Thanks to @RebootJeff for pull request #98)
  • v2.0.1 (2016-02-17)
  • v2.0.0 (2016-01-12)
    • Breaking Change: Removed explicit cls-bluebird dependency which has to be installed by the user now (Thanks to @hildjj for his pull request #75)
    • npm shrinkwrap now works for npm@3 users who don't use continuation-local-storage (Thanks to @toboid and @rstacruz for reporting the issue in issue #70 and issue #82)
  • v1.0.2 (2015-10-22)
    • Removed continuation-local-storage from peer dependencies as it was unnecessary (Thanks to @mrhyde for working on a better solution discussed in issue #70)
  • v1.0.1 (2015-10-14)
    • Fixed a npm warning by marking continuation-local-storage as a peer dependency
  • v1.0.0 (2015-10-11)
    • Breaking Change: Some errors that were previously thrown synchronously - e.g. for wrong input parameters - are now passed to the rejected promise instead (Thanks to @josnidhin for suggesting that in issue #43)
    • Breaking Change: Request-Promise does not load its own Bluebird prototype anymore. If you use Bluebird in your project and altered the prototype then Request-Promise may use your altered Bluebird prototype internally.
    • For HEAD requests the headers instead of an empty body is returned (unless resolveWithFullResponse = true is used) (Thanks to @zcei for proposing the change in issue #58)
    • Extended transform function by a third resolveWithFullResponse parameter
    • Added experimental support for continuation local storage (Thanks to @silverbp preparing this in issue #64)
    • Added node.js 4 to the Travis CI build
    • Updated the README (Thanks to many people for their feedback in issues #55 and #59)
  • v0.4.3 (2015-07-27)
    • Reduced overhead by just requiring used lodash functions instead of the whole lodash library (Thanks to @luanmuniz for pull request #54)
    • Updated dependencies
  • v0.4.2 (2015-04-12)
    • Updated dependencies
  • v0.4.1 (2015-03-20)
    • Improved Error types to work in browsers without v8 engine (Thanks to @nodiis for pull request #40)
  • v0.4.0 (2015-02-08)
    • Introduced Error types used for the reject reasons (See last part this section) (Thanks to @jakecraige for starting the discussion in issue #38)
    • Minor Breaking Change: The reject reason objects became actual Error objects. However, typeof reason === 'object' still holds true and the error objects have the same properties as the previous reason objects. If the reject handler only accesses the properties on the reason object - which is usually the case - no migration is required.
    • Added io.js and node.js 0.12 to the Travis CI build
  • v0.3.3 (2015-01-19)
    • Fixed handling possibly unhandled rejections to work with the latest version of Bluebird (Thanks to @slang800 for reporting this in issue #36)
  • v0.3.2 (2014-11-17)
    • Exposed .finally(...) to allow using it as the first method in the promise chain (Thanks to @hjpbarcelos for his pull request #28)
  • v0.3.1 (2014-11-11)
    • Added the .promise() method for advanced Bluebird API usage (Thanks to @devo-tox for his feedback in issue #27)
  • v0.3.0 (2014-11-10)
    • Carefully rewritten from scratch to make Request-Promise a drop-in replacement for Request

License (ISC)

In case you never heard about the ISC license it is functionally equivalent to the MIT license.

See the LICENSE file for details.

NPM DownloadsLast 30 Days