slidev

Pros of Reveal.js

• Mature and widely adopted, with a large community and extensive documentation
• Supports a wide range of browsers and devices
• Offers a plugin system for extending functionality

Cons of Reveal.js

• Requires more manual HTML and CSS coding for complex layouts
• Less integrated development experience compared to modern frameworks

Code Comparison

Reveal.js:

<div class="reveal">
  <div class="slides">
    <section>
      <h1>Slide Title</h1>
      <p>Slide content</p>
    </section>
  </div>
</div>

Slidev:

# Slide Title

Slide content

Key Differences

• Slidev uses Markdown for content creation, while Reveal.js primarily uses HTML
• Slidev offers built-in themes and layouts, whereas Reveal.js requires more manual styling
• Slidev provides a more integrated development experience with hot reloading and Vue.js components
• Reveal.js has a longer track record and broader browser support

Use Cases

• Choose Reveal.js for maximum flexibility and broad compatibility
• Opt for Slidev if you prefer a modern, developer-friendly workflow with Markdown and Vue.js integration

Pros of impress.js

• More flexible and creative presentation layouts with 3D transformations
• Lightweight and dependency-free, easy to integrate into existing projects
• Longer history and larger community support

Cons of impress.js

• Steeper learning curve, especially for non-developers
• Less built-in features and themes compared to modern alternatives
• Manual setup required for responsive designs and mobile support

Code Comparison

impress.js:

<div id="impress">
    <div class="step" data-x="0" data-y="0">Slide 1</div>
    <div class="step" data-x="1000" data-y="500" data-scale="2">Slide 2</div>
</div>
<script src="impress.js"></script>
<script>impress().init();</script>

Slidev:

# Slide 1

Content for slide 1

---

# Slide 2

Content for slide 2

Key Differences

• impress.js uses HTML and JavaScript for slide creation, while Slidev uses Markdown
• impress.js offers more control over slide positioning and transitions, but requires more manual setup
• Slidev provides a more streamlined development experience with built-in themes and features

Pros of Remark

• Lightweight and simple to use
• Supports Markdown syntax for creating slides
• Can be easily integrated into existing web projects

Cons of Remark

• Limited built-in themes and customization options
• Lacks advanced features like presenter mode or PDF export
• Requires more manual setup for complex presentations

Code Comparison

Remark:

class: center, middle

# My Presentation

---

## Slide 1

- Point 1
- Point 2
- Point 3

Slidev:

---
theme: seriph
background: https://source.unsplash.com/collection/94734566/1920x1080
class: text-center
highlighter: shiki
lineNumbers: false
---

# My Presentation

---

# Slide 1

- Point 1
- Point 2
- Point 3

Key Differences

• Slidev offers more built-in features and customization options
• Remark uses pure Markdown, while Slidev combines Markdown with YAML frontmatter
• Slidev provides a more opinionated structure and theming system
• Remark is more flexible for integration into existing projects
• Slidev offers better developer experience with hot-reloading and Vue.js integration

Pros of reveal-md

• Simpler setup and usage, ideal for quick Markdown-based presentations
• Built on the popular Reveal.js framework, offering a familiar experience
• Supports static HTML export for easy sharing and hosting

Cons of reveal-md

• Limited customization options compared to Slidev's Vue-based approach
• Fewer built-in features and integrations for developer-focused presentations
• Less active development and smaller community

Code Comparison

reveal-md:

# Title Slide

---

## Second Slide

- Bullet point 1
- Bullet point 2

Slidev:

# Title Slide

---

# Second Slide

- Bullet point 1
- Bullet point 2

<style>
h1 {
  color: #4a5568;
}
</style>

Key Differences

• Slidev offers more advanced features for developers, including code highlighting, diagrams, and Vue component integration
• reveal-md focuses on simplicity and ease of use, making it suitable for quick Markdown-based presentations
• Slidev provides a more modern and customizable presentation experience, while reveal-md leverages the established Reveal.js framework
• Both tools support Markdown syntax, but Slidev extends it with additional functionality and styling options

Pros of Decktape

• Supports a wide range of existing HTML presentation frameworks
• Can export presentations to PDF format
• Works with static HTML files, no need for a development server

Cons of Decktape

• Requires separate tools for creating presentations
• Limited customization options for the export process
• May have compatibility issues with some complex presentations

Code Comparison

Slidev (Vue.js-based slide creation):

<template>
  <div class="slidev-layout default">
    <h1>Hello World</h1>
    <p>This is a Slidev slide</p>
  </div>
</template>

Decktape (CLI command for exporting):

decktape reveal https://example.com/presentation.html presentation.pdf

Slidev focuses on creating presentations using Vue.js components and Markdown, offering a modern development experience with hot-reloading and custom themes. It generates HTML presentations that can be exported to PDF using its built-in export feature.

Decktape, on the other hand, is primarily a tool for exporting existing HTML presentations to PDF. It doesn't provide presentation creation capabilities but offers broad compatibility with various HTML presentation frameworks.

While Slidev provides an all-in-one solution for creating and exporting presentations, Decktape excels at converting existing HTML presentations to PDF, making it useful for archiving or sharing presentations created with other tools.

Pros of Marp

• Simpler learning curve with Markdown-centric approach
• Supports multiple output formats (HTML, PDF, PPTX)
• Lightweight and faster rendering for large presentations

Cons of Marp

• Less interactive and dynamic slide features
• Limited customization options compared to Slidev
• Fewer built-in themes and layouts

Code Comparison

Marp:

---
marp: true
theme: default
---

# Slide 1
Content for slide 1

---

# Slide 2
Content for slide 2

Slidev:

---
theme: default
---

# Slide 1
Content for slide 1

---

# Slide 2
Content for slide 2

Key Differences

• Syntax: Marp uses frontmatter for global settings, while Slidev uses it for both global and per-slide settings
• Customization: Slidev offers more advanced customization options through Vue components and CSS
• Interactivity: Slidev provides built-in support for animations, transitions, and interactive elements
• Development experience: Slidev offers hot module reloading and a dev server for real-time preview

Both tools are excellent choices for creating slide decks using Markdown, but they cater to different user needs. Marp is ideal for quick, simple presentations, while Slidev is better suited for more complex, interactive slide decks with advanced customization requirements.