Top Related Projects
The easiest HTTP networking library for Kotlin/Android
Asynchronous Http and WebSocket Client library for Java
An asynchronous, callback-based Http client for Android built on top of Apache's HttpClient libraries.
Framework for quickly creating connected applications in Kotlin with minimal effort
Quick Overview
Retrofit is a type-safe HTTP client for Android and Java, developed by Square. It simplifies the process of making network requests and handling the responses, providing a clean and efficient API for developers to work with.
Pros
- Type-Safe API: Retrofit uses Java interfaces to define the API endpoints, allowing for type-safe method calls and automatic serialization/deserialization of request and response data.
- Extensibility: Retrofit is highly extensible, allowing developers to customize the behavior of the HTTP client, serialization, and other aspects of the library.
- Asynchronous Support: Retrofit supports asynchronous network requests, making it easy to handle responses on a separate thread without blocking the main UI thread.
- Testability: The interface-based design of Retrofit makes it easy to write unit tests for the API calls, improving the overall testability of the application.
Cons
- Learning Curve: While Retrofit is powerful, it can have a steeper learning curve for developers who are new to the library or to the concept of type-safe HTTP clients.
- Dependency on Other Libraries: Retrofit often requires the use of additional libraries, such as OkHttp and Gson, which can add complexity to the project setup.
- Limited Support for Reactive Programming: While Retrofit does support RxJava, the integration can be complex, and the library may not be as well-suited for reactive programming as some dedicated reactive HTTP clients.
- Potential Performance Overhead: The abstraction and flexibility provided by Retrofit may introduce some performance overhead compared to a more low-level HTTP client implementation.
Code Examples
Here are a few examples of how to use Retrofit:
Defining the API Interface
public interface GitHubService {
@GET("users/{user}/repos")
Call<List<Repository>> listRepositories(@Path("user") String user);
}
Creating the Retrofit Instance
Retrofit retrofit = new Retrofit.Builder()
.baseUrl("https://api.github.com/")
.addConverterFactory(GsonConverterFactory.create())
.build();
GitHubService service = retrofit.create(GitHubService.class);
Executing a Request
Call<List<Repository>> call = service.listRepositories("square");
List<Repository> repositories = call.execute().body();
Handling Asynchronous Requests
Call<List<Repository>> call = service.listRepositories("square");
call.enqueue(new Callback<List<Repository>>() {
@Override
public void onResponse(Call<List<Repository>> call, Response<List<Repository>> response) {
List<Repository> repositories = response.body();
// Handle the response
}
@Override
public void onFailure(Call<List<Repository>> call, Throwable t) {
// Handle the error
}
});
Getting Started
To get started with Retrofit, follow these steps:
- Add the Retrofit and Gson converter dependencies to your project's
build.gradle
file:
dependencies {
implementation 'com.squareup.retrofit2:retrofit:2.9.0'
implementation 'com.squareup.retrofit2:converter-gson:2.9.0'
}
- Define your API interface using the Retrofit annotations:
public interface GitHubService {
@GET("users/{user}/repos")
Call<List<Repository>> listRepositories(@Path("user") String user);
}
- Create a Retrofit instance and the API service:
Retrofit retrofit = new Retrofit.Builder()
.baseUrl("https://api.github.com/")
.addConverterFactory(GsonConverterFactory.create())
.build();
GitHubService service = retrofit.create(GitHubService.class);
- Execute the API call:
Call<List<Repository>> call = service.listRepositories("square");
call.enqueue(new Callback<List<Repository>>() {
@Override
public void onResponse(Call<List<Repository>> call, Response<List<Repository>> response) {
List<Repository>
Competitor Comparisons
The easiest HTTP networking library for Kotlin/Android
Pros of Fuel
- Simplicity: Fuel provides a more concise and straightforward API compared to Retrofit, making it easier to use for simple HTTP requests.
- Coroutine Support: Fuel has built-in support for Kotlin coroutines, allowing for a more asynchronous and reactive programming style.
- Multipart Requests: Fuel has better support for multipart requests, which can be useful for file uploads.
Cons of Fuel
- Limited Ecosystem: Retrofit has a larger and more mature ecosystem, with a wider range of extensions and integrations available.
- Dependency Management: Fuel may require more manual dependency management compared to Retrofit, which is more tightly integrated with the Android ecosystem.
- Performance: Retrofit is generally considered to have better performance characteristics, especially for large-scale applications.
Code Comparison
Retrofit:
val retrofit = Retrofit.Builder()
.baseUrl("https://api.example.com/")
.addConverterFactory(GsonConverterFactory.create())
.build()
val service = retrofit.create(ApiService::class.java)
val call = service.getUsers()
call.enqueue(object : Callback<List<User>> {
override fun onResponse(call: Call<List<User>>, response: Response<List<User>>) {
// Handle response
}
override fun onFailure(call: Call<List<User>>, t: Throwable) {
// Handle error
}
})
Fuel:
Fuel.get("https://api.example.com/users")
.responseObject<List<User>> { _, _, result ->
when (result) {
is Result.Success -> {
// Handle response
}
is Result.Failure -> {
// Handle error
}
}
}
Pros of Volley
- Volley provides a simple and efficient way to manage network requests, making it a good choice for small to medium-sized projects.
- Volley's built-in support for caching and request prioritization can help improve the performance of your app.
- Volley's integration with the Android framework makes it easy to use and integrate with other Android components.
Cons of Volley
- Volley's limited functionality and lack of advanced features may make it less suitable for large, complex projects that require more customization.
- Volley's dependency on the Android framework can make it more difficult to use in cross-platform or non-Android projects.
Code Comparison
Retrofit:
Retrofit retrofit = new Retrofit.Builder()
.baseUrl("https://api.example.com/")
.addConverterFactory(GsonConverterFactory.create())
.build();
MyApiService service = retrofit.create(MyApiService.class);
Call<MyResponse> call = service.getData();
call.enqueue(new Callback<MyResponse>() {
@Override
public void onResponse(Call<MyResponse> call, Response<MyResponse> response) {
// Handle the response
}
@Override
public void onFailure(Call<MyResponse> call, Throwable t) {
// Handle the error
}
});
Volley:
RequestQueue queue = Volley.newRequestQueue(this);
String url = "https://api.example.com/data";
JsonObjectRequest request = new JsonObjectRequest(Request.Method.GET, url, null,
new Response.Listener<JSONObject>() {
@Override
public void onResponse(JSONObject response) {
// Handle the response
}
},
new Response.ErrorListener() {
@Override
public void onErrorResponse(VolleyError error) {
// Handle the error
}
});
queue.add(request);
Asynchronous Http and WebSocket Client library for Java
Pros of AsyncHttpClient/async-http-client
- Asynchronous and non-blocking, allowing for efficient handling of multiple requests
- Supports a wide range of HTTP features, including cookies, compression, and authentication
- Provides a simple and intuitive API for making HTTP requests
Cons of AsyncHttpClient/async-http-client
- Requires more manual handling of request and response objects compared to Retrofit
- May have a steeper learning curve for developers unfamiliar with asynchronous programming
- Lacks some of the advanced features and tooling provided by Retrofit, such as automatic serialization and deserialization
Code Comparison
Retrofit:
Retrofit retrofit = new Retrofit.Builder()
.baseUrl("https://api.example.com/")
.build();
MyService service = retrofit.create(MyService.class);
Call<ResponseBody> call = service.getData();
call.enqueue(new Callback<ResponseBody>() {
@Override
public void onResponse(Call<ResponseBody> call, Response<ResponseBody> response) {
// Handle the response
}
@Override
public void onFailure(Call<ResponseBody> call, Throwable t) {
// Handle the error
}
});
AsyncHttpClient:
AsyncHttpClient client = new AsyncHttpClient();
client.get("https://api.example.com/data", new AsyncHttpResponseHandler() {
@Override
public void onSuccess(int statusCode, Header[] headers, byte[] responseBody) {
// Handle the successful response
}
@Override
public void onFailure(int statusCode, Header[] headers, byte[] responseBody, Throwable error) {
// Handle the error
}
});
An asynchronous, callback-based Http client for Android built on top of Apache's HttpClient libraries.
Pros of android-async-http/android-async-http
- Simplicity: android-async-http provides a straightforward and easy-to-use API for making asynchronous HTTP requests on Android, with a focus on simplicity.
- Flexibility: The library allows for a high degree of customization, enabling developers to tailor the behavior of the HTTP requests to their specific needs.
- Compatibility: android-async-http is compatible with a wide range of Android versions, making it a suitable choice for projects targeting older Android devices.
Cons of android-async-http/android-async-http
- Maintenance: The android-async-http project is no longer actively maintained, which may be a concern for developers looking for long-term support and updates.
- Dependency Management: The library can be more challenging to integrate into projects that use other dependency management tools, such as Gradle, compared to more modern libraries like Retrofit.
- Performance: Retrofit is generally considered to have better performance characteristics than android-async-http, particularly in areas like connection pooling and efficient data parsing.
Code Comparison
Retrofit:
Retrofit retrofit = new Retrofit.Builder()
.baseUrl("https://api.example.com/")
.addConverterFactory(GsonConverterFactory.create())
.build();
MyApiService service = retrofit.create(MyApiService.class);
Call<ResponseBody> call = service.getData();
call.enqueue(new Callback<ResponseBody>() {
@Override
public void onResponse(Call<ResponseBody> call, Response<ResponseBody> response) {
// Handle the response
}
@Override
public void onFailure(Call<ResponseBody> call, Throwable t) {
// Handle the error
}
});
android-async-http:
AsyncHttpClient client = new AsyncHttpClient();
client.get("https://api.example.com/data", new AsyncHttpResponseHandler() {
@Override
public void onSuccess(int statusCode, Header[] headers, byte[] responseBody) {
// Handle the successful response
}
@Override
public void onFailure(int statusCode, Header[] headers, byte[] responseBody, Throwable error) {
// Handle the error
}
});
Framework for quickly creating connected applications in Kotlin with minimal effort
Pros of Ktor
- Ktor is a modern, asynchronous, and coroutine-based framework for building web applications and services, which can provide better performance and scalability compared to Retrofit.
- Ktor has a modular design, allowing developers to pick and choose the features they need, resulting in a more lightweight and customizable solution.
- Ktor provides a rich set of features, including support for HTTP/1.1, HTTP/2, WebSockets, and more, making it a versatile choice for building a wide range of web applications.
Cons of Ktor
- Ktor has a steeper learning curve compared to Retrofit, as it requires a deeper understanding of coroutines and asynchronous programming.
- The Ktor ecosystem is smaller than the Retrofit ecosystem, which means there may be fewer third-party libraries and resources available.
- Ktor is primarily focused on server-side development, while Retrofit is primarily focused on client-side development, so the use cases may not always align.
Code Comparison
Retrofit:
interface GitHubService {
@GET("users/{user}/repos")
suspend fun listRepos(@Path("user") user: String): List<Repo>
}
Ktor:
routing {
get("/users/{user}/repos") {
val user = call.parameters["user"]
val repos = listRepos(user)
call.respond(repos)
}
}
suspend fun listRepos(user: String?): List<Repo> {
// implementation
}
Convert designs to code with AI
Introducing Visual Copilot: A new AI model to turn Figma designs to high quality code using your components.
Try Visual CopilotREADME
Retrofit
A type-safe HTTP client for Android and Java.
For more information please see the website.
Download
Download the latest JAR or grab from Maven central at the coordinates com.squareup.retrofit2:retrofit:2.11.0
.
Snapshots of the development version are available in Sonatype's snapshots
repository.
Retrofit requires at minimum Java 8+ or Android API 21+.
R8 / ProGuard
If you are using R8 the shrinking and obfuscation rules are included automatically.
ProGuard users must manually add the options from retrofit2.pro. You might also need rules for OkHttp which is a dependency of this library.
License
Copyright 2013 Square, Inc.
Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
You may obtain a copy of the License at
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
limitations under the License.
Top Related Projects
The easiest HTTP networking library for Kotlin/Android
Asynchronous Http and WebSocket Client library for Java
An asynchronous, callback-based Http client for Android built on top of Apache's HttpClient libraries.
Framework for quickly creating connected applications in Kotlin with minimal effort
Convert designs to code with AI
Introducing Visual Copilot: A new AI model to turn Figma designs to high quality code using your components.
Try Visual Copilot