Pros of Hammer.js

• Framework-agnostic, can be used with any JavaScript project
• More comprehensive touch gesture support, including multi-touch and custom gestures
• Larger community and more frequent updates

Cons of Hammer.js

• Requires more setup and configuration for use with Vue.js projects
• Larger file size, which may impact performance for smaller applications

Code Comparison

Vue-touch:

Vue.use(VueTouch, {name: 'v-touch'})

<v-touch v-on:swipeleft="onSwipeLeft">Swipe me!</v-touch>

Hammer.js:

var hammer = new Hammer(element);
hammer.on('swipeleft', function(ev) {
  console.log('Swiped left!');
});

Summary

Hammer.js is a more versatile and powerful touch gesture library, offering broader support for various gestures and compatibility with different frameworks. However, Vue-touch provides a more seamless integration with Vue.js projects, requiring less setup and configuration. The choice between the two depends on the specific needs of your project, with Hammer.js being better suited for complex touch interactions across multiple platforms, while Vue-touch excels in simplicity for Vue.js applications.

Pros of Split

• Framework-agnostic, can be used with any JavaScript project
• Lightweight and focused on split functionality
• Supports both horizontal and vertical splitting

Cons of Split

• Limited to splitting functionality, not a comprehensive touch events library
• Requires more setup for complex touch interactions
• May need additional libraries for advanced touch gestures

Code Comparison

Split:

Split(['#left', '#right'], {
  sizes: [25, 75],
  minSize: 100,
  expandToMin: true,
  gutterSize: 10,
});

Vue-Touch:

Vue.use(VueTouch, { name: 'v-touch' })

<v-touch v-on:swipeleft="onSwipeLeft">
  <div>Swipe me!</div>
</v-touch>

Key Differences

• Split focuses on creating resizable split views, while Vue-Touch provides a wide range of touch gestures
• Vue-Touch is specifically designed for Vue.js applications, whereas Split can be used in any JavaScript environment
• Split offers more customization options for split functionality, while Vue-Touch provides easier implementation of various touch events

Use Cases

• Choose Split for projects requiring resizable split views, regardless of the framework
• Opt for Vue-Touch in Vue.js applications needing comprehensive touch event handling

Community and Maintenance

• Split: Active development, regular updates
• Vue-Touch: Less frequent updates, primarily maintained by the Vue.js community

Pros of Sal

• Lightweight and dependency-free, making it easier to integrate into projects
• Supports a wider range of scroll animations and effects
• More actively maintained with recent updates

Cons of Sal

• Less Vue-specific functionality compared to Vue Touch
• May require more manual configuration for complex animations
• Smaller community and fewer Vue-specific resources available

Code Comparison

Vue Touch (event handling):

<template>
  <div v-touch:swipe="onSwipe">Swipe me</div>
</template>

<script>
export default {
  methods: {
    onSwipe(direction) {
      console.log('Swiped:', direction)
    }
  }
}
</script>

Sal (scroll animation):

<div data-sal="slide-up" data-sal-duration="300" data-sal-easing="ease-out-bounce">
  Animate on scroll
</div>

<script>
import sal from 'sal.js'

sal()
</script>

While Vue Touch focuses on touch events and gestures, Sal is primarily used for scroll-based animations. Vue Touch integrates more seamlessly with Vue.js components, whereas Sal can be used in any JavaScript project, including Vue applications. The code examples demonstrate the different approaches: Vue Touch uses Vue directives for event handling, while Sal relies on data attributes for animation configuration.

Pros of Parallax

• More versatile, not limited to Vue.js applications
• Offers a wider range of parallax effects and animations
• Lightweight and easy to implement without a framework dependency

Cons of Parallax

• Less integrated with Vue.js ecosystem
• May require more manual setup and configuration
• Not specifically optimized for touch events like Vue-touch

Code Comparison

Vue-touch example:

import Vue from 'vue'
import VueTouch from 'vue-touch'

Vue.use(VueTouch, {name: 'v-touch'})

Parallax example:

import Parallax from 'parallax-js'

var scene = document.getElementById('scene');
var parallaxInstance = new Parallax(scene);

Summary

Parallax is a more general-purpose library for creating parallax effects, while Vue-touch is specifically designed for handling touch events in Vue.js applications. Parallax offers more flexibility and can be used in various contexts, but it may require more setup. Vue-touch integrates seamlessly with Vue.js and provides optimized touch event handling, but it's limited to Vue.js projects. The choice between the two depends on the specific requirements of your project and whether you're working within the Vue.js ecosystem.

Pros of iScroll

• More comprehensive scrolling solution with support for various scroll types (vertical, horizontal, infinite, etc.)
• Better performance optimization for mobile devices
• Wider browser compatibility, including older versions

Cons of iScroll

• Larger file size and potentially more complex implementation
• Not specifically designed for Vue.js integration
• May require more manual configuration for advanced features

Code Comparison

vue-touch example:

Vue.use(VueTouch, {name: 'v-touch'})

<v-touch v-on:swipeleft="onSwipeLeft">Swipe me!</v-touch>

iScroll example:

var myScroll = new IScroll('#wrapper', {
    scrollX: true,
    scrollY: true,
    mouseWheel: true
});

<div id="wrapper">
    <div id="scroller">
        <!-- Content here -->
    </div>
</div>

Summary

While vue-touch is specifically designed for Vue.js and focuses on touch events, iScroll provides a more comprehensive scrolling solution with broader compatibility. vue-touch offers easier integration with Vue.js projects, but iScroll may be more suitable for complex scrolling requirements and performance-critical mobile applications. The choice between the two depends on the specific needs of your project and the level of scrolling functionality required.

Pros of Dragula

• Framework-agnostic, can be used with any JavaScript project
• Supports nested draggable elements
• Lightweight and has minimal dependencies

Cons of Dragula

• Lacks built-in touch support, requiring additional configuration for mobile
• Not specifically designed for Vue.js integration

Code Comparison

Vue-touch (for Vue 2.x):

import Vue from 'vue'
import VueTouch from 'vue-touch'

Vue.use(VueTouch, {name: 'v-touch'})

Dragula:

import dragula from 'dragula'

dragula([document.querySelector('#left'), document.querySelector('#right')])

Key Differences

Vue-touch is specifically designed for Vue.js applications, providing touch gesture support. It's ideal for adding swipe, tap, and other touch interactions to Vue components.

Dragula, on the other hand, is a versatile drag-and-drop library that works across different frameworks. It excels in creating drag-and-drop interfaces but doesn't inherently support touch gestures beyond dragging.

While Vue-touch integrates seamlessly with Vue.js, Dragula requires additional setup for Vue integration but offers more flexibility for use in various project types.