Top Related Projects
Quick Overview
The web-platform-tests (WPT) project is a comprehensive test suite for the Web Platform. It contains tests for various web technologies and standards, including HTML, CSS, JavaScript APIs, and more. The project aims to improve interoperability between web browsers by providing a shared set of tests that can be run across different implementations.
Pros
- Extensive coverage of web standards and APIs
- Collaborative effort supported by major browser vendors and web developers
- Helps ensure consistent implementation across different browsers
- Regularly updated to keep pace with evolving web technologies
Cons
- Large test suite can be overwhelming for newcomers
- Running the full test suite can be time-consuming
- Some tests may be complex or difficult to understand without deep knowledge of web standards
- Occasional false positives or negatives due to the complexity of web technologies
Getting Started
To get started with web-platform-tests:
-
Clone the repository:
git clone https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt.git
-
Install the necessary dependencies:
cd wpt ./wpt install
-
Run the tests:
./wpt run chrome path/to/test.html
Replace chrome
with the browser you want to test (e.g., firefox
, safari
, etc.) and path/to/test.html
with the specific test or directory you want to run.
For more detailed instructions and options, refer to the project's documentation at https://web-platform-tests.org/running-tests/.
Competitor Comparisons
Test suites for Web platform specs — including WHATWG, W3C, and others
Pros of wpt
- Larger community and more active development
- More comprehensive test suite covering a wider range of web platform features
- Better integration with major browser vendors' testing infrastructure
Cons of wpt
- Potentially more complex setup and maintenance due to its larger scope
- May include tests for experimental or less widely supported features
Code comparison
wpt:
test(function() {
assert_true("IntersectionObserver" in window, "IntersectionObserver is supported");
}, "IntersectionObserver is supported");
wpt>:
test(function() {
assert_true("IntersectionObserver" in window, "IntersectionObserver should be supported");
}, "IntersectionObserver support");
The code comparison shows minor differences in test naming and assertion messages, but the overall structure and purpose remain similar. Both repositories focus on web platform testing, with wpt being the primary and more comprehensive project. The wpt> repository appears to be a fork or alternative version, potentially with some specific modifications or focus areas. However, without more context, it's challenging to determine the exact relationship or differences between the two repositories beyond these surface-level observations.
HTML Standard
Pros of html
- Focused specifically on HTML specification, providing a centralized resource for HTML standards
- Includes detailed explanations and rationales for HTML features and behaviors
- Allows direct contributions to the HTML specification, influencing web standards
Cons of html
- Limited scope, focusing only on HTML rather than broader web platform testing
- Smaller community and fewer contributors compared to the larger wpt project
- Less frequent updates and slower integration of new web features
Code Comparison
html (HTML specification):
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
<title>HTML Specification Example</title>
</head>
wpt (Web Platform Tests):
<!DOCTYPE html>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<title>Example Test</title>
<script src="/resources/testharness.js"></script>
<script src="/resources/testharnessreport.js"></script>
The html repository focuses on defining the HTML specification, while wpt provides a comprehensive testing framework for various web platform features. The html codebase primarily consists of the specification document, whereas wpt contains numerous test files covering a wide range of web technologies. wpt's tests are designed to be run across different browsers and platforms to ensure consistent implementation of web standards.
Convert designs to code with AI
Introducing Visual Copilot: A new AI model to turn Figma designs to high quality code using your components.
Try Visual CopilotREADME
The web-platform-tests Project
The web-platform-tests Project is a cross-browser test suite for the Web-platform stack. Writing tests in a way that allows them to be run in all browsers gives browser projects confidence that they are shipping software that is compatible with other implementations, and that later implementations will be compatible with their implementations. This in turn gives Web authors/developers confidence that they can actually rely on the Web platform to deliver on the promise of working across browsers and devices without needing extra layers of abstraction to paper over the gaps left by specification editors and implementors.
The most important sources of information and activity are:
- github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt: the canonical location of the project's source code revision history and the discussion forum for changes to the code
- web-platform-tests.org: the documentation website; details how to set up the project, how to write tests, how to give and receive peer review, how to serve as an administrator, and more
- wpt.live: a public deployment of the test suite, allowing anyone to run the tests by visiting from an Internet-enabled browser of their choice
- wpt.fyi: an archive of test results collected from an array of web browsers on a regular basis
- Real-time chat room: the
wpt:matrix.org
matrix channel; includes participants located around the world, but busiest during the European working day. - Mailing list: a public and low-traffic discussion list
- RFCs: a repo for requesting comments on substantial changes that would impact other stakeholders or users; people who work on WPT infra are encouraged to watch the repo.
If you'd like clarification about anything, don't hesitate to ask in the chat room or on the mailing list.
Setting Up the Repo
Clone or otherwise get https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt.
Note: because of the frequent creation and deletion of branches in this
repo, it is recommended to "prune" stale branches when fetching updates,
i.e. use git pull --prune
(or git fetch -p && git merge
).
Running the Tests
See the documentation website and in particular the system setup for running tests locally.
Command Line Tools
The wpt
command provides a frontend to a variety of tools for
working with and running web-platform-tests. Some of the most useful
commands are:
wpt serve
- For starting the wpt http serverwpt run
- For running tests in a browserwpt lint
- For running the lint against all testswpt manifest
- For updating or generating aMANIFEST.json
test manifestwpt install
- For installing the latest release of a browser or webdriver server on the local machine.wpt serve-wave
- For starting the wpt http server and the WAVE test runner. For more details on how to use the WAVE test runner see the documentation.
Windows Notes
On Windows wpt
commands must be prefixed with python
or the path
to the python binary (if python
is not in your %PATH%
).
python wpt [command]
Alternatively, you may also use
Bash on Ubuntu on Windows
in the Windows 10 Anniversary Update build, then access your windows
partition from there to launch wpt
commands.
Please make sure git and your text editor do not automatically convert
line endings, as it will cause lint errors. For git, please set
git config core.autocrlf false
in your working tree.
Publication
The master branch is automatically synced to wpt.live and w3c-test.org.
Contributing
Save the Web, Write Some Tests!
Absolutely everyone is welcome to contribute to test development. No test is too small or too simple, especially if it corresponds to something for which you've noted an interoperability bug in a browser.
The way to contribute is just as usual:
- Fork this repository (and make sure you're still relatively in sync with it if you forked a while ago).
- Create a branch for your changes:
git checkout -b topic
. - Make your changes.
- Run
./wpt lint
as described above. - Commit locally and push that to your repo.
- Create a pull request based on the above.
Issues with web-platform-tests
If you spot an issue with a test and are not comfortable providing a pull request per above to fix it, please file a new issue. Thank you!
Top Related Projects
Convert designs to code with AI
Introducing Visual Copilot: A new AI model to turn Figma designs to high quality code using your components.
Try Visual Copilot