Pros of tvheadend

• More comprehensive TV management system with recording capabilities
• Supports a wider range of TV tuners and input sources
• Has a built-in Electronic Program Guide (EPG) grabber

Cons of tvheadend

• More complex setup and configuration process
• Heavier resource usage due to its extensive feature set
• Less focused on IPTV streaming compared to xTeVe

Code Comparison

tvheadend (C):

static void http_stream_run(http_connection_t *hc, profile_chain_t *prch,
                            const char *name, const char *info)
{
  streaming_queue_t sq;
  th_subscription_t *s;
  streaming_target_t *st;
  int error;

xTeVe (Go):

func (config *Config) LoadConfig() (err error) {
    var configFile = config.GetConfigPath()
    jsonString, err := ioutil.ReadFile(configFile)
    if err != nil {
        return
    }

tvheadend is written in C and offers lower-level control over TV streaming and management, while xTeVe is written in Go and focuses on providing a simpler IPTV proxy solution. tvheadend's code snippet shows its streaming functionality, whereas xTeVe's code demonstrates configuration loading, highlighting their different primary focuses.

Pros of Jellyfin

• Full-featured media server with a rich user interface
• Supports a wide range of media types and formats
• Active development with frequent updates and improvements

Cons of Jellyfin

• More resource-intensive due to its comprehensive feature set
• Steeper learning curve for setup and configuration
• May be overkill for users only needing IPTV functionality

Code Comparison

xTeVe (Go):

func (config *Config) getIPTVConfig() *IPTVConfig {
    return &config.Files.IPTV
}

Jellyfin (C#):

public class MediaSourceInfo
{
    public string Path { get; set; }
    public string Protocol { get; set; }
    public MediaProtocol MediaProtocol { get; set; }
}

Key Differences

• xTeVe focuses specifically on IPTV and DVR functionality, while Jellyfin is a comprehensive media server solution
• xTeVe is written in Go, whereas Jellyfin is primarily developed in C#
• Jellyfin offers a more polished user interface and broader device support
• xTeVe is more lightweight and easier to set up for basic IPTV needs

Use Cases

• Choose xTeVe for a lightweight, IPTV-focused solution with lower resource requirements
• Opt for Jellyfin when seeking a full-featured media server with extensive format support and a rich user experience

Pros of Gerbera

• More comprehensive media server solution, supporting UPnP/DLNA protocols
• Actively maintained with regular updates and a larger community
• Supports a wider range of media types and transcoding options

Cons of Gerbera

• More complex setup and configuration process
• Higher system resource requirements due to its broader feature set
• Less focused on IPTV and live TV streaming compared to xTeVe

Code Comparison

xTeVe (Go):

func (config *Config) GetMappings() []Mapping {
    return config.Mapping
}

Gerbera (C++):

std::shared_ptr<CdsObject> CdsResourceManager::createObject(const std::string& objectType)
{
    return std::make_shared<CdsObject>(objectType);
}

Summary

Gerbera is a more comprehensive media server solution with broader support for various media types and protocols, while xTeVe focuses primarily on IPTV and live TV streaming. Gerbera offers more features but requires more setup and resources, whereas xTeVe is simpler and more specialized for its specific use case. The code comparison shows the different languages used (Go for xTeVe, C++ for Gerbera) and hints at their architectural differences.