Pros of loaders.css

• More comprehensive collection of loaders (42 different animations)
• Pure CSS implementation, no JavaScript required
• Customizable through SASS variables

Cons of loaders.css

• Larger file size due to more animations
• Less focused on specific use cases
• May require more customization for integration

Code Comparison

Loading:

public class AVLoadingIndicatorView extends View {
    // Implementation of a single loading indicator
}

loaders.css:

.loader-inner.ball-pulse > div {
  background-color: #fff;
  width: 15px;
  height: 15px;
  border-radius: 100%;
  margin: 2px;
  animation-fill-mode: both;
}

Summary

Loading is a Java-based Android library focusing on specific loading indicators, while loaders.css is a pure CSS solution offering a wider variety of animations. Loading may be more suitable for Android-specific projects, whereas loaders.css provides greater flexibility for web applications. The choice between the two depends on the target platform and the desired level of customization.

Pros of SpinKit

• More comprehensive collection of loading animations (12 different styles)
• Better browser compatibility, including support for older versions
• Minimal and clean CSS-only implementation, reducing dependencies

Cons of SpinKit

• Less customization options for individual animations
• Larger file size due to the variety of animations included
• No built-in JavaScript API for dynamic control of animations

Code Comparison

SpinKit (CSS):

.spinner {
  width: 40px;
  height: 40px;
  background-color: #333;
  margin: 100px auto;
  -webkit-animation: sk-rotateplane 1.2s infinite ease-in-out;
  animation: sk-rotateplane 1.2s infinite ease-in-out;
}

Loading (XML):

<com.victor.loading.rotate.RotateLoading
    android:id="@+id/rotateloading"
    android:layout_width="80dp"
    android:layout_height="80dp"
    app:loading_width="5dp"
    app:loading_color="#ffffff"/>

SpinKit focuses on CSS-based animations for web applications, offering a wide range of pre-built loading indicators. It's easy to implement and works across various browsers. Loading, on the other hand, is specifically designed for Android applications, providing more customization options and a Java API for programmatic control. While SpinKit excels in simplicity and browser support, Loading offers better integration with Android development workflows and more fine-grained control over individual animations.

Pros of css-loaders

• Pure CSS implementation, no JavaScript required
• Lightweight and easy to integrate into existing projects
• Wide variety of loader styles (8 different options)

Cons of css-loaders

• Limited customization options for each loader style
• No built-in functionality for showing/hiding loaders dynamically

Code Comparison

css-loaders:

.loader {
  border: 16px solid #f3f3f3;
  border-top: 16px solid #3498db;
  border-radius: 50%;
  width: 120px;
  height: 120px;
  animation: spin 2s linear infinite;
}

Loading:

public class LoadingView extends View {
    private int mCircleColor;
    private float mCircleRadius;
    private float mCircleX;
    private float mCircleY;
}

css-loaders uses CSS animations to create loading effects, while Loading uses Java to draw and animate custom views. css-loaders is more lightweight and easier to implement, but Loading offers more flexibility and customization options.

css-loaders is ideal for quick integration of simple loading animations, whereas Loading is better suited for projects requiring complex, customizable loading indicators with programmatic control.

Pros of loading

• Simpler and more lightweight implementation
• Focuses on a single, customizable loading animation
• Easy to integrate into React projects

Cons of loading

• Limited variety of loading animations
• Less customization options for appearance
• Lacks support for non-React projects

Code Comparison

loading:

import React from 'react'
import Loading from 'loading'

const MyComponent = () => (
  <Loading size={32} />
)

Loading:

LoadingView loadingView = new LoadingView(this);
loadingView.setLoadingText("Loading...");
loadingView.show();

Summary

Loading offers a wider range of loading animations and supports multiple platforms, including Android and iOS. It provides more customization options for appearance and behavior. On the other hand, loading is a simpler, React-focused solution that offers a single, customizable loading animation. Loading is more suitable for projects requiring diverse loading indicators across different platforms, while loading is ideal for React applications seeking a lightweight, easy-to-implement loading component.

Pros of three-dots

• Lightweight and focused solely on CSS-based loading animations
• Offers a wider variety of animation styles (30+) compared to Loading
• Easier to customize and integrate into existing projects due to its simplicity

Cons of three-dots

• Limited to dot-based animations, while Loading offers more diverse loading indicators
• Lacks JavaScript functionality for dynamic control of animations
• No built-in support for changing colors or sizes of animations

Code Comparison

three-dots:

.dot-elastic {
  position: relative;
  width: 10px;
  height: 10px;
  border-radius: 5px;
  background-color: #9880ff;
  animation: dot-elastic 1s infinite linear;
}

Loading:

public class AVLoadingIndicatorView extends View {
    private Indicator mIndicator;
    private int mIndicatorColor;
    private boolean mShouldStartAnimationDrawable;
    
    @Override
    protected void onDraw(Canvas canvas) {
        super.onDraw(canvas);
        drawIndicator(canvas);
    }
}

The code comparison shows that three-dots uses pure CSS for animations, while Loading relies on Java for more complex, customizable indicators. three-dots is simpler to implement but less flexible, whereas Loading offers more control at the cost of increased complexity.